Category: EV vehicles

  • Model 3 Performance Aero Kit Boosts Style and Downforce

    Model 3 Performance Aero Kit Boosts Style and Downforce

    The Tesla Model 3 Performance, a car that can go from 0 to 60 MPH in under three seconds, already has a fast and stylish design. However, Unplugged Performance felt it could be improved.

    Upgraded Carbon Fiber Aero Kit

    They have introduced a new Carbon Fiber Full Aero Kit for the 2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance that elevates its sporty look without looking overdone or pointless. The elements made of carbon fiber in the front fascia and the subtle rear spoiler help push the car down, increasing stability at high speeds, achieving 426lbs (1896N) of downforce while only increasing the drag coefficient by a mere 1.93%.

    Customizable Options

    Moreover, the Aero Kit is designed to be modular, allowing owners of the Model 3 Performance to choose the parts they want. However, the complete setup is visually impressive as it is. When asked about their decision to enhance the most performance-oriented Model 3, Unplugged Performance shared their view on Tesla’s somewhat plain vehicle designs.

    Tailored for Enthusiasts

    They mentioned that Tesla focuses on efficient manufacturing and broad usability for their cars. In contrast, they’ve tailored their kit for serious car enthusiasts who are looking for something distinct, akin to a premium AMG variant. It’s clear that the aftermarket kit not only makes the Model 3 Performance more noticeable but also adds “stability and grip when you need it, with only a rounding error’s worth of drag.”

    The Carbon Fiber Full Aero Kit for the 2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance features aerodynamics optimized through CFD and is currently available for preorder. Pricing starts at $395 for front deflectors or rear spats, $2,695 for the rear carbon fiber wing, and $7,430 for the complete M3P Aero Kit.


    Image 1
    Image 1
    Image 1
    Image 1
  • Tesla FSD V13.2 Launches: Full Parking Automation & 3-Point Turns

    Tesla FSD V13.2 Launches: Full Parking Automation & 3-Point Turns

    Tesla has unveiled its newest Full Self-Driving (Supervised) V13 edition, just a few months after the release of V12.5.

    Launch Timing and Features

    Previously, the AI team at Tesla had indicated that FSD 13 would be ready by October, likely coinciding with the Robotaxi demonstration. At the event, Cybercabs were indeed utilizing FSD 13. The public rollout has just occurred, and Tesla shared an extensive list of updates for FSD 13.2, highlighting improvements like a response speed that is twice as fast and enhanced collision avoidance, made possible by a three times larger AI model trained on computers that operate five times quicker.

    User Experience Enhancements

    While the statistics on processing capabilities, such as 5x-6x improvement in miles driven without needing intervention, are noteworthy, there are real benefits for users of FSD 13. For example, drivers can now engage FSD directly from Park with a simple button press. The new profiles for city and highway driving also contribute to a more pleasant driving experience.

    Development Insights

    Yun-Ta Tsai from Tesla mentioned the extraordinary effort to launch FSD 13:

    “We completely restructured the system to greatly simplify the flow—from direct photons to control—while adding much more functionality within the same unified framework. This is likely one of the most significant rewrites in years since we began our journey with ‘photon count’ four years ago.”

    New Functionalities

    Among the most noticeable features in FSD 13 are the capabilities for three-point turns and self-parking. The Tesla can now exit a parking spot, reverse, or park itself in locations like driveways or garages, with these features coming in a future update. FSD 13 also includes enhancements in camera visibility and cleaning, with plans for future updates to improve how the system handles camera view obstructions.

    Navigation Improvements

    FSD 13 can now identify road closures and suggest alternate routes, thanks to its ability to process mapping data more efficiently. Additionally, Tesla has tackled some common grievances of FSD users, such as unnecessary braking and overly cautious driving in parking areas.

    Hardware Limitations

    It’s unfortunate that all the new features in FSD 13.2 are only available for Tesla owners equipped with the latest HW4 or AI4 computer and camera systems. Most Teslas still operate on HW3, but Elon Musk hinted that the company might offer free upgrades to HW4 if it proves challenging to make the next unsupervised FSD update compatible with older hardware.

    With Elon Musk now leading the DOGE government efficiency department, the rollout of unsupervised FSD could happen more quickly, and it will soon be determined whether HW4 retrofits will be necessary.


    Image 1
  • Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD Hits 408 Miles on One Charge

    Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD Hits 408 Miles on One Charge

    Tesla’s Model 3 Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive (LR RWD) has gone well beyond its stated EPA-rated range of 363 miles (584 km), with a real-world test showing it achieved 408 miles (656 km) on just one charge. This impressive feat was highlighted by a user on X/Twitter, David (@dkrasniy), who posted a picture of the car’s dashboard readings, catching the eye of both electric vehicle fans and skeptics.

    Efficient Energy Consumption

    The post’s image shows that the 408-mile journey was accomplished with an energy use of 184 Wh/mile, which is notably higher than usual daily driving efficiency. The dashboard also notes a total energy consumption of 75 kWh for the trip, which is quite close to the Model 3’s battery capacity.

    Competitive Pricing

    Earlier this year, Tesla reintroduced the Model 3 LR RWD, advertising a 363-mile EPA-rated range, making it one of the top options for long-range in the Model 3 series. This vehicle is promoted as a blend of cost-effectiveness and extended range, with a price tag of $42,490 in the United States. It features Tesla’s latest efficiency upgrades and incorporates advanced powertrain software. Though the advertised range has been surpassed in the past, these new figures are indeed remarkable.

    Implications for Buyers

    The 408-mile achievement exceeds the EPA rating by over 12%. Most electric vehicles typically do not surpass their rated range in real-life conditions due to elements like weather, terrain, and driving habits. The dashboard image shared also includes more details from the trip.

    This information should intrigue potential buyers, as the Model 3 makes a compelling argument for long-range electric cars. While not every driver may replicate the same outcomes as demonstrated in the test, this real-life example offers valuable insights into the vehicle’s capabilities. Additionally, Tesla’s new lease buyout policy, which also applies to the Model 3, will make this electric vehicle an even more attractive option.


    Image 1
  • BYD Launches 2.3 MWh Sodium-Ion Battery for Grid Storage

    BYD Launches 2.3 MWh Sodium-Ion Battery for Grid Storage

    The second biggest battery producer in the world, BYD, has successfully created a sodium-ion battery pack that meets all the needs of a grid-level battery energy storage system (BESS). This innovative battery offers a long cycle life and impressive energy density.

    A New Era of Sodium-Ion Technology

    The MC Cube-SIB ESS container, which BYD claims is the “world’s first high-performance” sodium-ion battery for grid energy storage, features the company’s unique Blade packing design, as noted by Kai Wang from BYD. The MC Cube is rated at 1200V with a capacity of 2.3 MWh, and its voltage can range from 800V to 1400V.

    Comparison with Tesla’s Megapack

    In contrast, Tesla’s Megapack has a capacity of 3.9 MWh, but it utilizes LFP batteries similar to those found in the Bluetti Portable Power Station, which is currently available on Amazon at a 50% discount for Black Friday.

    Sodium-ion batteries are generally lower in cost because their raw materials are readily available. They also provide a longer lifespan and higher discharge rates even in cold conditions. Furthermore, sodium-ion batteries are considered safer than lithium batteries, which can face risks like piercing, exposure to high temperatures, or manufacturing flaws that might lead to dangerous thermal runaway.

    Future Prospects for BYD

    Even though lithium prices have significantly dropped in the last year due to a slowing EV market and increased production efficiency, BYD remains committed to its plan of constructing the world’s largest 30 GWh sodium-ion battery factory. This strategic decision will pay off when the factory becomes operational, especially with products like their high-performance Na-ion battery for grid energy storage.

    It is worth mentioning that HiNa Battery already has a functioning grid-level BESS that helps balance a local utility’s renewable energy network. Nonetheless, BYD’s 2.3 MWh MC Cube boasts superior energy density and overall performance, potentially lowering electricity costs below the $0.03/kWh level of HiNa’s sodium-ion grid battery solution, making it an exciting development in energy storage technology.

    Source: Link

  • Tesla Model Y Juniper Launch May Arrive Earlier Than Expected

    Tesla Model Y Juniper Launch May Arrive Earlier Than Expected

    Tesla’s Shanghai Gigafactory is reportedly getting ready to release the refreshed Model Y, nicknamed “Juniper.” The production lines are currently being used for both the existing Model Y and this new version. Currently, the Juniper model takes up a smaller share of the production capacity, indicating a careful increase in preparation for its expected launch in January 2025, which is sooner than the previously thought March 2025 date, according to a tweet from @zhongwen2005.

    Expected Upgrades and Challenges

    The Model Y Juniper is rumored to come with several design and tech improvements. However, Tesla is facing hurdles in California, where Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration is looking to cut Tesla from the state’s electric vehicle (EV) rebate program. This program is aimed at boosting competition in the EV market by helping newer companies. In response, Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, has called this decision “insane,” highlighting that Tesla is the only EV maker in California.

    Financial Implications of Policy Changes

    Being excluded from California’s rebate program could mean that the Model Y Juniper will cost $7,500 more for customers in the state, which could affect sales of EVs. This situation is also influenced by the federal government reducing EV tax credits, making things even trickier for Tesla’s buyers.

    Battery Production Concerns

    On top of these policy issues, there are some doubts about Tesla’s 4680 battery technology for the new Model Y. The chairman of CATL, the largest battery maker globally, has openly questioned whether Tesla can produce these batteries at a competitive price. Nonetheless, Tesla remains hopeful about increasing its 4680 battery output in the U.S. and taking advantage of government incentives to help reach its manufacturing targets.

    As the Austin-based electric vehicle leader navigates these changing regulations and market conditions, the Model Y Juniper is set to become more significant in Tesla’s 2025 strategy than initially anticipated. The upcoming launch will indeed challenge Tesla‘s ability to adapt in a market that is increasingly competitive.

    Source: Link,Link


    Image 1
  • Cybertruck Turning Radius Test: Rear Wheel Steering Performance

    Cybertruck Turning Radius Test: Rear Wheel Steering Performance

    Tesla’s first electric pickup, the Cybertruck, is massive yet can maneuver easily thanks to its four-wheel steering feature.

    Exceptional Maneuverability

    As is common with this kind of technology, the rear wheels can turn slightly opposite to the front wheels, allowing even larger vehicles to make tight turns. The Cybertruck showcases this ability, and there’s a direct visual comparison of its turning radius with the four-wheel steering both engaged and disengaged.

    In a brief video, the Cybertruck without the rear steering is seen making tight turns around another one that has its rear steering active.

    Innovative Engineering

    Tesla’s chief engineer, Lars Moravy, has stated that the four-wheel steer-by-wire system and the rear steering angle are facilitated by the new 48V low-voltage system. In the past, the power required to operate the rear electric steering motors would have been too much for the older 12V system.

    It’s worth noting that Tesla’s steer-by-wire design includes safety measures like having two electric motors at the front, ensuring that the vehicle can still function if one motor fails.

    Off-Road Capabilities

    Along with its impressive turning ability, which is essential for navigating city streets and tight parking spaces, the Cybertruck is also designed for off-roading. It features ample approach and departure angles for overcoming obstacles, along with a highly capable air suspension that can raise the vehicle significantly in lifted mode. Additionally, it has a compressor that seals the battery in Wade Mode, allowing it to cross rivers with ease.

    Source: Link

  • California Cuts Tax Credit for Tesla Model Y, Supports Non-Tesla EVs

    California Cuts Tax Credit for Tesla Model Y, Supports Non-Tesla EVs

    The new Trump administration is looking to eliminate the federal tax credit for new electric vehicles, which could negatively impact Tesla’s sales, especially in California.

    State Rebate Plans

    California’s Governor Newsom has announced that the state will bring back its rebate incentive for new EV purchases that was removed last year. This move is intended to help automakers cope with the potential loss of the federal tax credit.

    The Inflation Reduction Act, which oversees the federal EV tax credits, was initially designed to last until 2032. However, the incoming administration seems to have different budget priorities, focusing more on new technologies like carbon capture rather than the established EV market.

    Price Increase for Tesla Buyers

    For those looking to buy Tesla vehicles in California, particularly the much-anticipated Model Y Juniper facelift, they may face a price increase of $7,500 compared to the existing Model Y. This is not due to Tesla raising prices for its Juniper refresh, but rather the impact of the changing incentives.

    Governor Newsom mentioned that the state rebate will be allocated based on market share to foster competition among electric vehicle manufacturers. “It’s about creating the market conditions for more of these car makers to take root,” he said.

    Impact on Tesla’s Market Share

    This strategy will effectively leave Tesla out of the state funds meant to offset the loss of the federal tax credit, as Tesla holds the largest market share in the state.

    Even though Tesla’s EV market share in California has declined from last year, the company still accounts for more than half of all electric vehicle sales in the state. Therefore, the sudden removal of all tax incentives could hinder its growth opportunities.

    Elon Musk has pointed out that Tesla is the only company producing electric vehicles in California, suggesting that excluding it from future state rebates would not make much sense.

    Source: Link

  • Hyundai and Kia Recall 208,000 EVs for Power Loss Risk

    Hyundai and Kia Recall 208,000 EVs for Power Loss Risk

    Related auto brands Hyundai and Kia are recalling a total of 208,000 electric vehicles (EVs) in North America due to a problem that could heighten the chances of an accident. Correspondence from the National Highway Traffic Safety Agency (NHTSA) to Hyundai Motor America reveals that the issue lies within the Integrated Charging Control Unit (ICCU), which may fail and stop the 12-volt battery from charging. This malfunction can result in a loss of driving power.

    Affected Models

    Most of the recalled cars belong to the Hyundai brand, with 145,235 units possibly impacted. The models included in this action are the Genesis GV60, Genesis GV70 “Electrified,” Genesis G80 “Electrified” (for the years 2023-2024), Ioniq 5 (2022-2024 editions), and Ioniq 6 (2023-2025 editions).

    Inspection and Repairs

    To fix the issue, car owners will need to take their vehicles to a dealer. There, the ICCU and its fuse will be checked and replaced if needed, all at no cost to the owner. Additionally, the dealer will update the software for the ICCU.

    The NHTSA has indicated that this current Hyundai recall takes precedence over an earlier one. The solution will also cover any vehicles that have already undergone repairs.

    Kia Recall Details

    Kia is recalling approximately 63,000 EV6 models from the 2022-2024 lineups for a similar concern. A malfunctioning transistor in the ICCU might hinder the 12-volt battery’s ability to charge, which could lead to a loss of power.

    Owners of the Kia EV6, including those previously recalled for the same issue, must visit a Kia dealer to have their ICCU unit checked and possibly replaced for free. They will also receive a software update.

    Both Hyundai and Kia aim to issue recall notifications, with Hyundai expected to do so in January and Kia in December.

    Source: Link

  • Tesla Responds to High Fatality Crash Rate with Model 3 Safety Data

    Tesla Responds to High Fatality Crash Rate with Model 3 Safety Data

    Tesla’s chief engineer, Lars Moravy, is actively countering claims from a recent report that states Teslas have the highest fatality crash rate among all vehicles. He argues that the report’s conclusions are misleading.

    Report Overview

    The report examined data from the federal U.S. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), which is managed by the NHTSA. It focused on accidents involving cars from the 2018 to 2022 model years that resulted in at least one death, either for drivers or passengers.

    In this analysis, Tesla emerged as the brand with the highest fatality crash rate overall. Although the Hyundai Venue held the worst record for individual models, the Model S had a fatality rate that was twice the average, while the popular Model Y of Tesla had a crash death rate nearly four times higher than average. This placed it among the top 10 most dangerous vehicles in the U.S., according to the study.

    Issues with Comparisons

    However, while it may seem accurate to label Tesla as having the highest fatality rate based on the FARS data, this comparison is flawed. Tesla has significantly fewer models on the market compared to other manufacturers, which often offer a wider range of vehicles.

    In defense of Tesla, Moravy asserted, “the math is incorrect – crash test data is real; Teslas are among the safest cars.” He suggested that the calculations might suffer from a poor denominator, noting that by the end of 2022, U.S. model year miles driven exceeded 7 billion, with the Model 3 alone at around 19 billion. While Tesla’s safety data from crash tests is indeed impressive, it doesn’t necessarily explain the fatality rates in real-world accidents, which could be influenced by many factors.

    Additional Information

    If you’re in the market for charging solutions, you can find the 80A Tesla Gen 2 Wall Connector with a 24-foot cable on Amazon.

    Source: Link,Link


    Image 1
  • Tesla Launches Smart Summon Feature in Europe and Middle East

    Tesla Launches Smart Summon Feature in Europe and Middle East

    Tesla vehicles get better over time thanks to updates that introduce new features and improve existing ones. Yet, some buyers in various regions have to wait longer to access these features. A recent example is the Actually Smart Summon, which took a while to reach customers in Europe and the Middle East. According to a post on X (previously Twitter) from one of Tesla’s official accounts, the feature has finally launched in those regions.

    Feature Launch in the U.S.

    The feature was made available in the United States back in September. It allows Tesla owners to summon their car from its parked spot to their current location using the Tesla app, as long as the vehicle is not too far away. For instance, this could be handy for retrieving your Tesla from a store’s entrance, saving you the hassle of carrying your shopping all the way back to the parking lot.

    Limitations in Europe and the Middle East

    However, there is a notable restriction with the version released in Europe and the Middle East. While the US version functions within a range of approximately 213 ft (65 m), drivers in these regions must stay within 19.7 ft (6 m) of their car, turning the feature into more of a gimmick than a useful tool.

    This limitation arises from the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe’s (UNECE) regulations, which require drivers to be 20 ft (~6 m) or closer to their vehicles when operating them autonomously. The specific regulation is UNECE Regulation No. 79 Revision 5, which pertains to advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and automated driving systems (ADS).

    Future Prospects

    On the bright side, this rollout is seen as a step toward the launch of FSD (Supervised) in Europe, China, and other regions. In the U.S., Tesla debuted Actually Smart Summon alongside an update to FSD (Supervised); this could suggest that the highly awaited ADAS will soon be available outside of North America.

    Drivers in Europe might voice their frustration over receiving a limited version of the feature, but it seems even more challenging for Canadians, who still don’t have access to Actually Smart Summon. Typically, Canada follows closely behind the U.S. in getting new Tesla features, so this delay is unexpected.

    Tesla Europe & Middle East shared this update on X (formerly Twitter).

    Source: Link