Tag: iPhone 17 Pro

  • iPhone Air and 17 Pro Drop Test: Surprising Shatter Results

    iPhone Air and 17 Pro Drop Test: Surprising Shatter Results

    Key Takeaways

    1. Both the iPhone Air and iPhone 17 Pro can crack their screens when dropped face-first from six feet, despite remaining functional after impacts.
    2. The iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone Air bent under 200 and 190 pounds of pressure, respectively, but both still worked afterward.
    3. The new Ceramic Shield 2 front displays are more vulnerable to face-down drops, while the new Ceramic Shield rear panels offer better protection.
    4. The iPhone 17 Pro Max has a higher resistance of 240 pounds, making it slightly more durable than the other two models.
    5. Users are advised to use protective accessories, as repair costs for damages can be very high, reaching up to $749 for the 17 Pro.

    Post a successful bend test by well-known YouTuber JerryRigEverything, Allstate Protection Plans carried out independent breakability tests that showed Apple’s latest iPhone Air and iPhone 17 Pro can still get quite damaged due to gravity. The tests utilized robotic tools such as the “DropBot” and “BendBot” to mimic everyday accidents. Both phones passed controlled bending tests without losing their functionality, yet both screens cracked when dropped face-first from a height of six feet.

    Drop Tests Reveal Weaknesses

    In the drop tests, both the iPhone Air and iPhone 17 Pro remained functional after the impact, but their new Ceramic Shield 2 front displays broke instantly when dropped face-down. When dropped back-side down, the iPhone 17 Pro only suffered minor cosmetic damage, while the Air showed cracks on its back panel but continued to work. According to Allstate, this is due to the new Ceramic Shield rear panels that have taken the place of the older glass backs on earlier iPhone models.

    Bend Test Performance

    During the bend tests conducted by Allstate, the iPhone 17 Pro bent under 200 pounds of pressure, whereas the iPhone Air bent at 190 pounds. However, both devices were still operational afterward. Although these numbers are lower than the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s impressive 240-pound resistance, they still surpass the durability standards set by the industry. The iPhone Air, which is almost 35 percent thinner than the iPhone 17 Pro, came close to matching its strength, likely thanks to its rectangular camera housing and titanium frame, as noted by Allstate.

    As stated by Jason Siciliano, who is the VP of marketing at Allstate Protection Plans, it is recommended that iPhone 17 users utilize protective accessories for their devices, since repair costs can reach as high as $749 for the 17 Pro and $699 for the Air (not including AppleCare).

    Accessory Recommendation

    Consider purchasing the Spigen tempered glass screen protector for the iPhone 17 Pro on Amazon, to help prevent damage to your device.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: ,
  • Hidden Upgrade in Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max You Might Have Missed

    Hidden Upgrade in Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max You Might Have Missed

    Key Takeaways

    1. The iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max showcase significant improvements, including aluminum unibodies and upgraded cameras that outperform the Galaxy S25 Ultra.

    2. A noteworthy enhancement is the “stronger and sharper” LED flash in the iPhone 17 Pro Max compared to its predecessor.

    3. While the flash upgrade may seem minor, it can significantly enhance nighttime photography when night modes are insufficient.

    4. Good flash performance is essential for many users who rely on their smartphones as their primary flashlights.

    5. Apple’s focus on small details, like the flash upgrade, contributes to a better overall user experience in high-end smartphones.

    With the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, Apple has shown its strength in a way that we haven’t seen for a while. Both models come with aluminum unibodies, include vapor chambers to regulate the heat from the powerful A19 Pro chip, and feature upgraded cameras that appear to surpass those found in the Galaxy S25 Ultra. Yet, amidst these significant improvements, Apple has also introduced a subtle enhancement that many users might have missed.

    Noteworthy Flash Enhancement

    According to a post on r/iPhone, the iPhone 17 Pro Max features a “stronger and sharper” LED flash compared to the iPhone 16 Pro Max. Other users on Reddit have echoed this observation, with one individual expressing amazement at the flashlight’s performance and the sound quality of the speaker.

    The Importance of Small Upgrades

    At first glance, this might not seem like a major update. Today’s smartphones typically don’t need to depend on a powerful rear flash for better nighttime photos, thanks to advancements in low-light photography and specific night modes. However, when those night modes fall short, a superior flash can really make a difference. For many, smartphones serve as their only flashlights, making a good flash an essential feature.

    Apple’s Attention to Detail

    It’s commendable that Apple has focused on these minor aspects alongside the big features that grab attention. This small change may be almost unnoticeable to most. Yet, it’s arguably these little details that enhance the user experience of high-end smartphones compared to mid-range ones.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: ,
  • Anker Unveils Compact USB-C Charger with Digital Display

    Anker Unveils Compact USB-C Charger with Digital Display

    Key Takeaways

    1. Anker is set to launch a new USB-C charger with a smart display designed for the Apple iPhone 17 Pro.
    2. The charger, model number A121D, will have a maximum output of 45W and is expected to support fast charging.
    3. It will feature folding pins and a digital display to show charging details, similar to Anker’s other products.
    4. The official launch date for the charger is September 27th in China, with pricing and global availability still unknown.
    5. The new charger may resemble another model, A2693, which is also a 45W USB-C charger with a digital display, but details on differences are unclear.

    Anker has hinted at a new USB-C charger featuring a smart display on social media in China. In a recent Weibo post, the company revealed that this accessory, designed specifically for the newly launched Apple iPhone 17 Pro, is set to be available in this market later in September.

    Model and Specifications

    Although the post and accompanying images do not specify the exact name of the new Anker USB-C charger, it is identified by the model number A121D. This charger is anticipated to deliver a maximum output of 45W. An image showing the bottom of the device indicates that it will provide ‘X5W’ power. Apple has mentioned that the iPhone 17 Pro can achieve a 50% charge in just 20 minutes when using a minimum 40W adapter, which supports the idea of this being a 45W charger.

    Design Features

    Anker also mentions that this compact charger will feature folding pins. Additionally, it will include a digital display, similar to the brand’s new Charger (140W, 4-Port, PD 3.1) priced at $99.99 on Amazon, to show charging details. Based on the description, this teased accessory appears to resemble the rumored model A2693, which is also a 45W USB-C charger equipped with a digital display. At this point, it’s still unclear how these two products will be different from one another.

    Launch Date

    The official unveiling of the new Anker USB-C charger with a smart display is scheduled for September 27th in China. It is yet to be determined how much this product will cost in the country, and it’s uncertain when or if it will be available in other countries around the globe.

    Source:
    Link

    Anker Unveils Compact USB-C Charger with Digital Display

     

    Tags: ,
  • iPhone 17 Pro Max Durability Test: Scratchgate Blame on Apple

    iPhone 17 Pro Max Durability Test: Scratchgate Blame on Apple

    Key Takeaways

    1. JerryRigEverything’s latest durability test criticized Apple’s design choices for the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, particularly regarding scratch issues.
    2. The anodisation process creates a protective oxide layer on the aluminum body, but it is ineffective on sharp edges, leading to vulnerability to scratches.
    3. Apple did not round the edges of the camera area for aesthetic reasons, which compromises scratch resistance compared to the rest of the device.
    4. Common items like keys and coins can easily damage the protective layer on the camera edges, unlike the rest of the phone which might only require wiping to remove scratches.
    5. The new Ceramic Shield 2 display glass shows visible scratches at Mohs level 8, indicating an improvement in durability compared to older iPhone models.

    The latest durability assessment on JerryRigEverything’s YouTube channel has been somewhat atypical. The host, Zack Nelson, known as JerryRigEverything, used a crane scale to test the iPhone Air and didn’t hold back in his critique of Apple regarding the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, which were examined in Orange and Blue, respectively. Zack pointed out that the many claims about scratched iPhones are valid and stem from issues that could have been avoided, implying that Apple is solely responsible for the situation dubbed “Scratchgate.”

    Explanation of the Issue

    JerryRigEverything provided a reasonable theory for this problem: During the anodisation process, the aluminium unibody of the phone gets a hard oxide layer, which is meant to shield the metal underneath from damage due to the environment. Even though this layer is rated at 9 on the Mohs hardness scale, it cannot be applied to sharp edges. Following the required DIN standard, Apple should have slightly rounded the edges of the camera area to enhance scratch resistance, akin to the rest of the device. However, it seems the company chose not to do this for aesthetic reasons.

    Consequences of Design Choices

    This choice has significant effects on the look of the large camera module. JRE effectively illustrated this using a microscope, showing that common items like keys and coins can easily scrape away the thin protective layer on the edges. While scratch residues from other objects can be wiped off the rest of the iPhone, the edges of the camera plateau are different; the delicate oxide layer actually comes off if the phone is not safeguarded by a case from the start.

    The durability test provides some confirmation of the many reports about scratched iPhone 17 demo units. Still, it’s worth noting that some scratches on the display glass or flat aluminium surfaces might be removable with a simple wipe, which has been seen in earlier iPhone models. The remaining parts of the durability test did not highlight any other serious issues: The new Ceramic Shield 2 display glass began to show visible scratches at Mohs level 8 (similar to the iPhone Air), indicating a clear improvement compared to older iPhone versions.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • iPhone 17 Pro Max Camera Beats Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra in Reviews

    iPhone 17 Pro Max Camera Beats Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra in Reviews

    Key Takeaways

    1. The iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max feature a 48MP 4x telephoto lens, enhancing camera performance significantly compared to the regular iPhone 17.
    2. Early comparisons between the iPhone 17 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra highlight the iPhone’s superior low-light and nighttime photography capabilities.
    3. The new 18MP Center Stage front camera on the iPhone 17 series offers better versatility and performance, especially for nighttime selfies and video stabilization.
    4. Both iPhones and Galaxy S25 Ultra struggle with macro photography, but the Galaxy performs slightly better in this area, while dedicated telemacro options exist in other brands.
    5. The iPhone 17 Pro outperforms the Galaxy S25 Ultra in DxOMark rankings, but Samsung offers unique features like 8K video and advanced AI capabilities.

    One of the key reasons to choose an iPhone 17 Pro or iPhone 17 Pro Max instead of the regular iPhone 17 is the enhanced camera, which now features a 48MP 4x telephoto lens. It’s not surprising that many early evaluations are concentrating on the camera’s performance, especially since we’ve already witnessed drop tests and initial teardown clips this past weekend after the phone’s official launch.

    YouTube Comparisons

    In their first videos regarding the new Pro iPhone, two prominent YouTubers have drawn comparisons to the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, which is also rather expected. This phone is the most commonly available Android flagship, even though some people argue that it struggles to compete with premium smartphone cameras from Chinese brands, like the Vivo X200 Ultra.

    Camera Innovations

    For both MrWhosetheboss and SuperSaf, the new 18MP Center Stage front-facing camera on the iPhone 17 series is a notable advancement. It not only surpasses Samsung’s equivalent in terms of dynamism but also offers more versatility with its flexible formats. The iPhone 17 excels in taking selfies at night, and its video stabilization shows improvement too. However, SuperSaf does favor selfies taken with a flash in very dark settings on the Galaxy S25 Ultra.

    Nighttime Performance

    When directly compared, the new iPhone outshines its predecessor, particularly in low-light conditions. For instance, there’s a reduction in jitter artifacts in dim videos. Numerous examples shared by these two YouTubers demonstrate that the iPhone 17 Pro Max is superior in illuminating challenging scenes. Even in telephoto comparisons, where Samsung typically excels during the day, Apple takes the lead as lighting conditions worsen. For example, text captured at 20x zoom appears clearer on the iPhones, even with Samsung’s optical advantages.

    Macro Photography

    Neither device handles macro shots flawlessly. While both Apple and Samsung can take macro pictures using their ultrawide cameras, both YouTubers agree that the Galaxy S25 Ultra does slightly better. For those looking to capture macro images with a telephoto lens, options like Vivo, Xiaomi, or Oppo flagships are preferable, as they can shoot telemacro from mere inches away. With the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s 4x telephoto, you need to be about 3 feet from the subject to achieve a clear image, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra performs in between and takes this category.

    Zoom Capabilities

    Regarding zoom, both smartphones showcase their strengths when the optical telephoto focal length is perfectly aligned. Samsung generally excels at 3x and 5x zoom, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max tends to render superior pictures at 4x and 8x. As previously mentioned, the advantage often shifts in Apple’s favor at night; however, Ice Universe has noted artifacts appearing on the Galaxy S25’s telephoto camera during daylight. In the X post linked above, images taken at approximately 9x-10x zoom reveal odd artifacts on the Galaxy S25 Ultra, attributed to Samsung’s zoom algorithms. This issue becomes even more noticeable when closely examining 30x zoom shots from both devices. Those who are willing to take the risk seem to discover more natural details on the iPhone 17 Pro, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra presents overly sharpened and distorted images.

    Overall Rankings

    The iPhone 17 Pro also significantly outperforms the Galaxy S25 Ultra in DxOMark’s assessment of top smartphone cameras. Nonetheless, both devices have their strengths and weaknesses beyond just camera capabilities. For instance, Samsung is the only brand offering 8K video, and its Galaxy AI features often operate more effectively than Apple’s Intelligence counterpart. A Pro mode is also only present on Android flagships, at least with standard software. Conversely, only Apple permits users to customize the photo style using Photographic Styles, which is somewhat achievable on Vivo and Xiaomi devices.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone Air: Scratch Issues with Dark Colors

    iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone Air: Scratch Issues with Dark Colors

    Key Takeaways

    1. Apple launched the iPhone 17 series on September 9, introducing the slim iPhone Air alongside Pro and Pro Max versions.
    2. Display units in multiple countries showed noticeable scratches after a few hours of use, raising concerns about durability.
    3. A scratch test by YouTuber Wylsacom revealed significant vulnerability to scratches, especially on the Deep Blue iPhone 17 Pro.
    4. Scratches were commonly found around the MagSafe charging area of the iPhone Air and on the back of the iPhone 17 Pro models.
    5. Apple claims the iPhone’s front is three times more resistant to scratches and the back is four times less prone to cracking than previous models, though scratch resistance on the back is not emphasized.

    Apple introduced the iPhone 17 series on September 9, bringing forth the slimmest model yet, called the iPhone Air, along with the familiar Pro and Pro Max versions. The iPhone 17 Pro features an aluminum body, while the iPhone Air has a ceramic shield on both the front and back. Nevertheless, display units at Apple Stores in China, France, and London have been observed to have noticeable scratches and marks after just a few hours of use.

    YouTuber’s Scratch Test

    On September 18, Russian YouTuber Wylsacom released a video where he conducted a scratch test on the iPhone 17 Pro. He pointed out that the Deep Blue iPhone 17 Pro showed a significant vulnerability to scratches. This observation was supported by French publication Consomac, which confirmed similar issues during their hands-on experience at the Apple Store in Lyon Confluence. The dark-colored variants, like the iPhone 17 Pro Max and Space Black iPhone Air, also experienced these problems.

    Findings on Scratches

    Scratches were especially common around the MagSafe charging area of the iPhone Air and throughout the back of the iPhone 17 Pro models. Mark Gurman from Bloomberg similarly reported finding scratches on demo units in cities like Shanghai, Hong Kong, and London. The Pro models feature an aluminum unibody, a choice made by Apple to incorporate a vapor chamber for better heat dissipation.

    The iPhone Air, in contrast, features a ceramic shield that is fairly resistant to bending, but struggles with color retention. According to Apple, the front of the phone is three times more resistant to scratches and the back is four times less prone to cracking than earlier iPhone models, though they do not emphasize the back’s scratch resistance. Many enthusiasts are eagerly awaiting the well-known JerryRigEverything to test the durability of the iPhone 17 series, particularly the iPhone Air. Meanwhile, several bend tests available online demonstrate the strength of the iPhone Air.

    Wylsacom’s YouTube channel, along with reports from Consomac and Bloomberg, highlight these concerns regarding the iPhone 17 series.

    Source:
    Link

    iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone Air: Scratch Issues with Dark ColorsiPhone 17 Pro and iPhone Air: Scratch Issues with Dark ColorsiPhone 17 Pro and iPhone Air: Scratch Issues with Dark ColorsiPhone 17 Pro and iPhone Air: Scratch Issues with Dark Colors

     

    Tags: ,
  • iPhone 17 Pro Cost: Global Affordability Index Highlights Divide

    iPhone 17 Pro Cost: Global Affordability Index Highlights Divide

    Key Takeaways

    1. The iPhone Affordability Index shows significant global disparities in the number of workdays required to purchase an iPhone 17 Pro, with the U.S. averaging just four days of labor.

    2. In India, acquiring the iPhone 17 Pro takes about 160 workdays, highlighting extreme cost differences compared to wealthier nations.

    3. Other countries with high workday requirements include the Philippines (101 days), Vietnam (99 days), and Turkey (89 days).

    4. Switzerland and Luxembourg have the lowest affordability, needing only about three days of earnings to buy the iPhone 17 Pro.

    5. The index relies on the official U.S. retail price of $1,099, and calculations may not reflect actual take-home pay, as seen in Germany where it effectively costs nearly two weeks of salary.

    Tenscope has revised its iPhone Affordability Index, using the newly launched iPhone 17 Pro as a reference point. This index provides insights into the differences in wealth and income around the world. For example, in the United States, an average worker only requires four days of labor to buy an iPhone 17 Pro (256 GB).

    Global Disparities in Pricing

    In stark contrast, in India, this new flagship phone costs about 160 workdays, which translates to 32 weeks or 8 months of labor when calculated on a 5-day workweek. The iPhone 17 Pro is also extremely pricey in other nations like the Philippines (101 days), Vietnam (99 days), and Turkey (89 days). On the flip side, individuals in Switzerland and Luxembourg find the iPhone 17 Pro most affordable, as they only need about three days of earnings to acquire the device.

    Pricing Considerations

    It’s important to mention that Tenscope based their analysis on the official US retail price of $1,099, even if the costs may differ across regions. Additionally, the calculations for the index sometimes rely on gross income. For instance, in Germany, while the average gross income is around €4,700 ($5,533), the actual take-home pay is significantly lower at about €2,950 ($3,473). This implies that the iPhone 17 Pro realistically costs nearly two weeks’ worth of salary in Germany. Therefore, the findings in the iPhone Affordability Index should be interpreted as a rough estimate.

    Source:
    Link

    iPhone 17 Pro Cost: Global Affordability Index Highlights Divide

     

    Tags:
  • Aulumu A17 Series Offers Real-Time Overheating Alerts for iPhone 17 Pro

    Aulumu A17 Series Offers Real-Time Overheating Alerts for iPhone 17 Pro

    Key Takeaways

    1. A17 Frosted Case Design: Features a unique look with a monochrome outline for the MagSafe coil and a raised rear lens shield, enhancing the camera area aesthetic.

    2. Temperature Monitoring: The lens shield includes a “CPU monitor” that changes colors to indicate the iPhone’s temperature in specific ranges.

    3. Material and Compatibility: Made from a durable TPU shell using a dual-sided IMD process, the Frosted Case is compatible with MagSafe.

    4. A17 Slim Shockproof Case: Offers advanced cooling technology and enhanced drop protection, featuring tactile feedback buttons and a touch-sensitive Camera Control button.

    5. Pricing and Availability: The A17 Frosted Case is available for $39.98, while the A17 Slim Shockproof Case is priced at $54.98, with sales on Amazon starting September 25, 2025.

    There are many smartphones out there featuring eye-catching transparent designs and glowing highlights, but the new iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max don’t fit into that category. Aulumu is a brand that says it’s leading the charge in bringing such aesthetics to Apple’s latest mobile devices through protective cases.

    A17 Frosted Case Design

    Their newest A17 Frosted Case does indeed give the premium smartphones a look that resembles the Nothing Phone (3), showcasing a mostly monochrome outline for the MagSafe coil and a distinct raised rear lens shield. This addition adds more character to the otherwise plain camera area of the 17 Pro series.

    The lens shield also includes Aulumu’s “CPU monitor,” which is designed to change colors from green to orange to red. This feature indicates the temperature of the iPhone within specific ranges: around 25-39°C, 40-44°C, and 45°C or above.

    Material and Compatibility

    The Frosted Case is crafted from a TPU shell, which is made using a “dual-sided IMD process” that helps maintain its raised features against wear and scratches. It’s also compatible with MagSafe while attached to the iPhone.

    The A17 Slim Shockproof Case serves a similar purpose but has a smoother exterior that must be taken off first. This shell uses Aulumu’s CoolHyper Superconductive Cooling Tech, which includes an aluminum plate and a silicone pad. It’s advertised to lower the temperatures of the 17 Pro series by as much as 46%. Additionally, it has raised corner bumpers for “up to 4x MIL-STD-810G” drop protection, a feature not found in the Frosted Case.

    Additional Features and Pricing

    The Shockproof version enhances the original aluminum buttons with “tactile feedback” and adds a “touch-sensitive” Camera Control button. The A17 Slim Shockproof Case can be purchased in black or white directly from Aulumu’s website for $54.98, with sales on Amazon expected to begin on September 25, 2025.

    Meanwhile, the A17 Frosted Case is already available on Amazon, but only in Translucent Gray for $39.98 (compared to $34.98 on the Aulumu website). A Translucent White version is set to be released on September 25.

    Aulumu’s Announcement

    LONDON, 17th SEPTEMBER, 2025 – AULUMU, a brand recognized for creating premium smartphone accessories that blend advanced functionality with striking aesthetics, has introduced its new iPhone 17 case line. Featuring the A17 Slim Shockproof Case and the A17 Frosted Case, this collection combines excellent protection, innovative cooling solutions, and unique design elements. These cases are compatible with the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max, continuing the brand’s legacy of merging style and practicality in accessories for the latest smartphone generation.

    Source:
    Link

    Aulumu A17 Series Offers Real-Time Overheating Alerts for iPhone 17 ProAulumu A17 Series Offers Real-Time Overheating Alerts for iPhone 17 Pro

     

    Tags:
  • Vivo X300 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra: Key Videography Upgrades

    Vivo X300 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra: Key Videography Upgrades

    Key Takeaways

    1. Oppo and Vivo are focusing on video features to compete with Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro.
    2. Vivo’s X300 series will be the first to record 4K portrait videos at 60 FPS and offers 120 FPS slow-motion video recording.
    3. The Vivo X300 Pro supports Dolby Vision HDR while recording in 4K at 120 FPS, along with 10-bit Log for color grading.
    4. The X300 Pro features improved stabilization with CIPA 5.5-stop and enhanced electronic image stabilization (EIS).
    5. Vivo claims the X300 Pro outperforms competitors like Xiaomi 15 Ultra and Galaxy S25 Ultra in video capabilities, challenging Apple directly.

    It appears that both Oppo and Vivo are aiming to compete with Apple regarding the video features of their upcoming flagship smartphones. Just last week, Oppo hinted that the Find X9 and Find X9 Pro would come with significant ‘video enhancements’ designed to take on iPhones such as the iPhone 17 Pro and the previous iPhone 16 Pro (currently priced at $749 – refurbished on Amazon).

    Vivo Joins the Competition

    Shortly after, Vivo entered the competition, revealing that the new X300 series plans to either match or exceed the capabilities of the X200 Ultra in a certain aspect of photography. It seems that these new models will be the first to record 4K portrait videos at 60 frames per second. Additionally, the X300 Pro is also capable of filming 120 FPS slow-motion videos in 4K resolution.

    Impressive Features Ahead

    Furthermore, Vivo’s executive Han Bo Xiao claims that the Vivo X300 Pro can utilize Dolby Vision HDR while recording in 4K at 120 FPS. This feature also supports 10-bit Log for easier color grading during post-production. For comparison, the X200 Ultra can only achieve 4K/60 FPS when shooting in either 10-bit Log or Dolby Vision HDR.

    The X300 Pro reportedly offers CIPA 5.5-stop stabilization for both its primary and telephoto cameras and boasts enhanced electronic image stabilization (EIS) compared to earlier Vivo models. While complete camera specifications are still pending confirmation, Han Bo Xiao is already making daring statements, asserting that the Vivo X300 Pro surpasses the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and Galaxy S25 Ultra in video capabilities while also directly challenging Apple.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • iPhone 17 Pro GPU Ray Tracing Stability vs iPhone 17 Test Results

    iPhone 17 Pro GPU Ray Tracing Stability vs iPhone 17 Test Results

    Key Takeaways

    1. The iPhone 17 Pro features a new vapour chamber cooling system, enhancing thermal management for better performance.
    2. In a stress test, the iPhone 17 Pro scored a stability rating of 61.4%, while the iPhone 17 with the standard A19 chip scored 66.2%.
    3. The iPhone 17 Pro outperformed the iPhone 17 in Best loop scores (2,116 vs. 1,831), but the iPhone 17 Pro Max achieved the highest scores overall.
    4. The stability of the iPhone 16 Pro Max and iPhone 17 Pro Max was nearly identical, indicating effective performance balancing by Apple.
    5. The iPhone 17 Air, with its less powerful A19 chip, performed worse than the base iPhone 17 model in benchmark tests.

    The iPhone 17 Pro has been introduced with various updates in terms of design, camera, and battery. One of the most significant enhancements is the new vapour chamber cooling system. This upgraded cooling technology is logical, especially since the A19 Pro chip is said to perform well, especially in graphics processing.

    Performance Review

    When popular YouTuber The Tech Chap reviewed the Apple iPhone 17 Air, it gave us a chance to see how the iPhone 17 Pro compares to other models from this year and the previous iPhone 16 Pro Max. During the 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme stress test, which lasts around 20 minutes and tests ray tracing performance over time, the iPhone 17 Pro with the advanced A19 Pro chip scored a stability rating of 61.4%. In contrast, the more budget-friendly iPhone 17 with the standard A19 chip achieved a stability score of 66.2%, which is clearly better.

    Score Comparisons

    The iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro had similar Lowest loop scores, with figures of 1,211 and 1,298, respectively. However, when assessing the Best loop scores, there was a notable difference: the iPhone 17 scored 1,831 while the iPhone 17 Pro reached 2,116. This indicates that, although the A19 Pro chip is quite potent, users seeking top performance should consider the iPhone 17 Pro Max. This model recorded the highest Best and Lowest loop scores of 2,139 and 1,440, respectively, with an overall stability of 67.4%.

    Insights on Stability

    A fascinating finding from the benchmark tests is that the iPhone 16 Pro Max and the iPhone 17 Pro Max displayed nearly the same stability throughout the stress test. This implies that Apple has effectively balanced increased performance with better thermal management, as the differences are quite notable. The Best loop score for the iPhone 16 Pro Max at 1,421 is actually a tad lower than the Lowest loop score of the iPhone 17 Pro Max.

    If you’re curious about the performance of the iPhone 17 Air, the video primarily highlights it, and you can check it out through the link below. Analyzing the benchmark data from this test suggests that the slightly less powerful A19 Pro chip, which has one fewer GPU core in the iPhone 17 Air, performs even worse than the base model iPhone 17.

    Source:
    Link

    iPhone 17 Pro GPU Ray Tracing Stability vs iPhone 17 Test ResultsiPhone 17 Pro GPU Ray Tracing Stability vs iPhone 17 Test Results

     

    Tags: ,