Tag: DxOMark

  • iPhone 17 Series Fails to Rank in DxOMark Display Top 20

    iPhone 17 Series Fails to Rank in DxOMark Display Top 20

    Key Takeaways

    1. The iPhone 17 series features LTPO OLED screens with a 120 Hz refresh rate and impressive brightness levels (1,600 nits full-screen, 3,000 nits peak HDR).

    2. All models in the iPhone 17 lineup have similar display quality, with precise color accuracy and excellent readability, despite their different price points.

    3. The average touch response time for the iPhone 17 is 35 ms, making it faster than the Galaxy S25.

    4. Some drawbacks include low contrast at 1 nit brightness, which can hinder readability in dark settings and make videos appear overly dark in low light.

    5. The iPhone 17 series scores 151 in DxOMark’s rankings, placing it 25th, significantly behind competitors like the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.


    The Apple iPhone 17, iPhone Air, and iPhone 17 Pro Max come equipped with LTPO OLED screens that boast a refresh rate of 120 Hz. They also achieve a full-screen brightness of 1,600 nits and peak HDR brightness reaching 3,000 nits. A detailed analysis by DxOMark reveals that there is no significant difference in display quality among the entire iPhone 17 series, no matter the price.

    Display Quality Insights

    The evaluation of the iPhone 17, iPhone Air, and iPhone 17 Pro Max confirmed that all three devices provide precise color accuracy, even at elevated brightness levels. They also deliver excellent readability, thanks in part to an enhanced display surface that minimizes distracting reflections. Additionally, DxOMark found a PWM frequency of 480 Hz, which is generally not expected to create problems for most users.

    Performance Comparison

    The average response time for touch inputs on the iPhone 17 is 35 ms, enabling it to respond to touches twice as quickly as the Galaxy S25. However, the displays in the iPhone 17 series do have some drawbacks. DxOMark pointed out that content can be displayed at just 1 nit, resulting in low contrast in darker settings, which makes reading difficult unless brightness is adjusted manually. Moreover, videos can seem overly dark in low-light situations.

    Rankings and Scores

    With an overall score of 151, the trio of devices ranks 25th in DxOMark’s listings. This places Apple’s latest smartphones significantly behind other high-performing models like the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (161 points), Pixel 10, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Pixel 9 Pro XL, and Galaxy S25 Edge.

    Source:
    Link


     

  • iPhone 17 Pro Front Camera Tops DxOMark Review Rankings

    iPhone 17 Pro Front Camera Tops DxOMark Review Rankings

    Key Takeaways

    1. The iPhone 17 Pro features an innovative 18MP f/1.9 front camera with a unique square sensor, allowing easy switching between shot orientations.
    2. The iPhone 17 Pro scored 154 points in the DxOMark selfie camera assessment, ranking it first among smartphones, surpassing competitors like the iPhone 16 Pro and Honor Magic6 Pro.
    3. The front camera is praised for precise exposure, broad dynamic range, and true-to-life color reproduction, though skin tones may appear too warm at times.
    4. With a 20mm focal length, the iPhone 17 Pro can fit larger groups into one frame more effectively than its predecessor’s 23mm lens.
    5. While the camera excels in bokeh effect and depth of field, it struggles with noticeable image noise in low light and may have issues with video stabilization.


    While the iPhone 16 Pro comes equipped with a 12MP f/1.9 main camera that has a small 1/3.6-inch sensor, the new iPhone 17 Pro boasts an innovative 18MP f/1.9 front camera featuring a unique square sensor. This design is not seen in any other smartphones on the market. It enables users to easily switch between square, portrait, and landscape shots without needing to rotate the device.

    Impressive Performance Rankings

    According to a comprehensive review by DxOMark, this enhancement has definitely paid off, as the iPhone 17 Pro achieved an impressive score of 154 points in the selfie camera assessment, securing the top spot in the rankings. Apple’s latest flagship model surpasses the iPhone 16 Pro and the Honor Magic6 Pro, both of which scored 151 points and are now in the second position. Following them are the iPhone 15 Pro with 149 points and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL with 148 points.

    Notable Camera Features

    The front camera earns praise for its consistently precise exposure, broad dynamic range, and true-to-life color reproduction, although skin tones can sometimes look a bit too warm. With a 20mm focal length, it’s easier to fit larger groups into one frame compared to the predecessor’s 23mm. The depth of field is adequate, allowing for crisp images of subjects in both the foreground and background, even without a variable aperture.

    Apple has also outperformed its rivals by delivering a remarkably precise bokeh effect, likely attributed to the Face ID technology. However, the relatively small sensor does exhibit noticeable image noise in low-light situations, and the image stabilization may not be entirely effective, as shown in the video linked below.

    Source:
    Link


     

  • iPhone 17 Pro Beats Vivo X200 Ultra in DxOMark Camera Test

    iPhone 17 Pro Beats Vivo X200 Ultra in DxOMark Camera Test

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Vivo X200 Ultra dropped from third to fourth place in DxOMark’s smartphone camera rankings, while the iPhone 17 Pro entered the top three by a narrow margin.
    2. Many users find the iPhone 17 Pro’s ranking absurd, especially since it scored lower in the photo category compared to the Vivo X200 Ultra.
    3. The iPhone 17 Pro excels in video performance, scoring high for its ultra-wide-angle and main camera capabilities, despite its lower photo score.
    4. The Vivo X200 Ultra and Huawei Pura 80 Ultra are recommended for superior photo quality based on DxOMark’s evaluations.
    5. Minor issues in the iPhone 17 Pro’s video mode include focus and white balance challenges with moving subjects, as well as some image noise in low-light conditions.


    The French camera evaluators at DxOMark are stirring the pot again with their strict ranking system for smartphone cameras, which has produced some odd outcomes before. A new test, labeled as preliminary by DxOMark (which means not every result is out yet), is already causing a stir in the community after its release. The findings show that the Vivo X200 Ultra has dropped from third to fourth place, while the latest iPhone has squeezed into the top three by a single point, falling just behind the Oppo Find X8 Ultra and the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra.

    Community Reactions

    Many users who have both devices, like @sondesix, think this is utterly absurd. Given the score the iPhone 17 Pro received in the camera evaluation, this criticism appears to be fair. Let’s explore how the testers defended this rating for Apple’s new smartphone. Specifically in the video category, the iPhone 17 Pro scored two top marks, outshining its rivals in both ultra-wide-angle and main camera segments. This highlights how the overall score was reached, even with its lesser performance in the photo category.

    Photo Performance Compared

    The Vivo X200 Ultra clearly surpasses the iPhone 17 Pro in the Photo sub-score with 173 points against 166 points. Therefore, DxOMark suggests that for those in search of the finest camera for photos, the Vivo X200 Ultra or the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra would be a better choice, as they still dominate the custom ranking for raw photo quality. However, when looking at the custom ranking for video, the iPhone 17 Pro has now taken over first place from last year’s iPhone 16 Pro Max. Testers have noted the iPhone 17 Pro’s remarkable video capabilities, precise exposure, and consistent white balance with high dynamics, even in dim lighting. They also commend the minimal image artifacts, attractive bokeh effect, and the smooth transition among the three camera modules.

    Minor Issues Identified

    Interestingly, there are very few drawbacks mentioned. The report highlights occasional minor issues with focus and white balance for moving subjects in video mode, along with reduced texture detail near zoom settings. A bit of image noise can also be observed when shooting indoors or in low light. The complete test results are anticipated to be released shortly. Below are three comparison images from DxOMark featuring the Pura 80 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra, and the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL, which further illustrate that the iPhone 17 Pro isn’t necessarily the best option in all situations, especially regarding photos.

    Source:
    Link


     

  • Pixel 10 Pro XL: Best Smartphone Display Ever, Says DxOMark

    Pixel 10 Pro XL: Best Smartphone Display Ever, Says DxOMark

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Pixel 10 Pro XL includes an optional 480 Hz PWM setting to reduce eyestrain.
    2. It can dim to 4 nits in darkness and reach 2,200 nits for HDR peak brightness.
    3. The Pixel 10 Pro XL scores slightly higher than the Pixel 10 on DxOMark, both praised for color accuracy and HDR performance.
    4. Touchscreen performance is precise and responsive, but the Pixel 10 Pro XL has color distortion at certain angles, while the Pixel 10 struggles with palm rejection.
    5. The Pixel 10 series leads on DxOMark’s leaderboard, setting a high standard for future smartphone competitors.


    However, the Pixel 10 Pro XL comes with a unique optional 480 Hz PWM setting that helps to lessen eyestrain. Additionally, Google’s newest flagship can dim down to just 4 nits in complete darkness, while reaching an impressive 2,200 nits for full-panel HDR peak brightness. As reported by DxOMark, the Pixel 10 Pro XL has a slight edge over the more affordable Pixel 10, scoring just one point higher. Both phones are praised for their ability to display colors accurately, adapt well to varying brightness, and handle HDR10 videos smoothly, regardless of the lighting situation.

    Touchscreen Performance

    Furthermore, both models feature touchscreens that are both precise and quick to respond. However, they do have their drawbacks. For example, the Pixel 10 Pro XL experiences some color distortion when viewed from certain angles. On the other hand, the Pixel 10 occasionally struggles with palm rejection. Despite these minor issues, the Pixel 10 series currently holds the top position on DxOMark’s leaderboard, likely until the results for the iPhone 17 series are released.

    Future Competitors

    In summary, both devices showcase impressive technology and performance, making them standout choices in the smartphone market. As consumers await the next round of testing from DxOMark, the Pixel 10 line continues to impress with its capabilities, setting a high standard for future devices in the competitive smartphone arena.

    Source:
    Link


     

  • Pixel 10 Pro XL Ranks Top Five in DxOMark, Beats iPhone 16 Pro Max

    Pixel 10 Pro XL Ranks Top Five in DxOMark, Beats iPhone 16 Pro Max

    Key Takeaways

    1. The iPhone 17 Pro features an advanced telephoto lens, potentially shifting the smartphone camera rankings.
    2. The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL currently outperforms the iPhone 16 Pro Max, according to DxOMark evaluations.
    3. The Pixel 10 Pro XL received high scores for its ultra-wide camera and video quality, including a top score of 145 points in video tests.
    4. The camera excels in exposure, dynamic range, white balance, and detail from its 5x telephoto lens.
    5. Areas for improvement include enhancing the bokeh effect in portraits, medium-range zoom detail, and reducing flare in outdoor images.


    When Apple reveals its top-tier iPhone 17 Pro, featuring what is claimed to be the most advanced telephoto lens in any smartphone to date, the leaderboard for the best camera phones could shift. Yet, as of now, Google’s latest camera flagship has surpassed the iPhone 16 Pro Max. The freshly released DxOMark camera evaluation of the Pixel 10 Pro XL is very favorable, even though last year’s Pixel 9 Pro had snagged the second position, just behind the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra.

    2025 Rankings and Performance

    In 2025, it managed to take the fourth position, which is still impressive as it sits within the top 5, trailing the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra, Oppo Find X8 Ultra, and Vivo X200 Ultra. It may come as a surprise that the Pixel 10 Pro XL’s ultra-wide camera got the highest score in the video test with 145 points, outdoing the X200 Ultra. Vivo’s flagship, equipped with a 1/1.28-inch sensor and 4K120 support, should theoretically perform better than the Pixel 10 Pro, but this is only true in the photo category. It’s puzzling why the Pixel 10 Pro is deemed the best in this segment, and this isn’t the first time DxOMark has faced some backlash regarding its smartphone camera rankings.

    Camera Quality Insights

    The review highlights the excellent exposure and dynamic range of images and videos captured with the Pixel 10 Pro XL, emphasizing its accurate white balance and natural skin tone rendering. In comparison to other models, it showed a low propensity for artifacts and a reliable autofocus system. The impressive detail from the 5x telephoto lens was also commended.

    Areas for Improvement

    There were not many drawbacks noted. Nevertheless, Google could enhance the bokeh effect in portrait mode and medium-range zoom shots, which currently lack a bit of detail. Furthermore, reviewers observed some flare in outdoor images, and low-light captures miss some detail when compared to rival devices. You can view the complete camera assessment here. Below are three comparison images shared on X, illustrating how the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL stacks up against its predecessor, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, and the iPhone 16 Pro Max.

    Source:
    Link


     

  • Vivo X200 Ultra Ranks Second in DxOMark Camera Test

    Vivo X200 Ultra Ranks Second in DxOMark Camera Test

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Vivo X200 Ultra scored 167 points in DxOMark’s review, making it a top camera flagship, just behind the Oppo Find X8 Ultra.
    2. It outperformed major competitors like Huawei Pura 70 Ultra, Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, and Xiaomi 15 Ultra in zoom evaluations.
    3. Reviewers praised the Vivo X200 Ultra for excellent exposure in portrait images, sharp detail, and reliable autofocus in various lighting conditions.
    4. The ultrawide-angle camera performed well in low-light situations, with impressive detail captured in zoom shots up to 10x.
    5. Minor issues were noted with white balance and autofocus in low-light conditions, as well as some loss of detail and increased noise in low-light video recordings.


    Although the assessments and camera evaluations from DxOMark often face scrutiny, it remains a leading testing laboratory in the smartphone and camera field. Recently, they published their review of the Vivo X200 Ultra, which quickly secured a top position among the best camera flagships. With a score of 167 points, it falls just two points shy of the top spot held by the Oppo Find X8 Ultra.

    Competing with the Best

    This new Zeiss camera flagship has surpassed several competitors, including the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra, Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, and Xiaomi 15 Ultra featuring Leica optics. In their zoom evaluation, the Vivo X200 Ultra even outperformed all other flagship cameras. A detailed comparison of the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Find X8 Ultra shows that the Oppo device earned slightly higher points in categories like portrait shots, indoor and outdoor images, and low-light photography. Nonetheless, the differences are quite small.

    Testers’ Insights

    The reviewers commend the Vivo X200 Ultra for its superb exposure in portrait images, as well as its sharp detail and reliable autofocus in both daylight and indoor settings. The ultrawide-angle camera also stands out, delivering impressive detail in low-light conditions, which was also apparent in zoom shots up to roughly 10x. When it comes to video capabilities, the testers noted the good exposure and efficient autofocus performance.

    However, DxOMark pointed out some minor issues with white balance and autofocus in low-light environments, along with daylight video. In low-light video recordings, experts observed a loss of detail and a rise in noise levels. Occasionally, halo artifacts were also noticed. For a comprehensive review of the Vivo X200 Ultra’s camera performance, you can find it here.

    Source:
    Link


     

  • DxOMark Names Oppo Find X8 Ultra Best Camera Phone

    DxOMark Names Oppo Find X8 Ultra Best Camera Phone

    Key Takeaways

    1. Oppo’s Find X8 Ultra achieved the top spot in DxOMark’s camera rankings with a score of 169.
    2. The device offers a well-balanced camera experience, with strong performance in Photo Portrait mode and realistic Bokeh effects.
    3. It excels in HDR performance and color rendering, providing vibrant and natural colors in various lighting conditions.
    4. The zoom capabilities are praised for maintaining high detail at long and medium distances, despite some color inconsistencies.
    5. Challenges include occasional ghosting and image artifacts in demanding test scenarios.


    Oppo’s Find X8 Ultra has now taken the lead in DxOMark’s rankings for the best camera phones. This achievement follows the introduction of a new V6 testing protocol by DxOMark, which also resulted in some shifts in the rankings of other flagship models on the list.

    Impressive Score

    The Find X8 Ultra secured an overall score of 169 in DxOMark’s camera evaluation. This impressive score has propelled the Oppo flagship, powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, ahead of the previously leading Huawei Pura 70 Ultra, which now holds the second position with a score of 163 points.

    Well-Balanced Performance

    According to DxOMark, the Find X8 Ultra delivers a well-rounded camera experience. In their evaluation, the flagship device consistently produced strong results. The Photo Portrait mode was highlighted for its accurate subject separation, and the Bokeh effect was noted for its realism.

    Excellent HDR and Color Rendering

    Additionally, the smartphone performed well in HDR tests for both video and photos across various lighting situations. DxOMark further emphasized that the Find X8 Ultra provides vibrant yet natural color reproduction in both portrait and landscape shots, maintaining consistency even in moderately difficult conditions.

    The zoom capabilities of the phone also received commendation from the DxOMark team, which reported that the cameras preserved high detail at both long and medium distances. However, there were some areas where the Find X8 Ultra did not meet expectations, as the team noted occasional color inconsistencies.

    Challenges and Additional Insights

    Furthermore, the team encountered ghosting and image artifacts in particularly demanding testing scenarios. A comprehensive review of the Find X8 Ultra’s camera performance is available on DxOMark, and you can delve deeper into the phone’s features through our extensive review.

    Source:
    Link


     

  • Google Pixel 9a Camera & Display Reviews – DxOMark Global Rank 33

    Google Pixel 9a Camera & Display Reviews – DxOMark Global Rank 33

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Pixel 9a scored 153 points in camera performance, ranking 33rd globally and first in the high-end category for upper mid-range smartphones.
    2. The camera features a solid dynamic range, precise exposure, and vibrant colors, but struggles with zoomed shots and low-light conditions.
    3. The display received a score of 155 points, the highest in its category, and ranked 8th globally.
    4. The display is noted for being excellent for web browsing and watching videos, with a responsive and clear screen.
    5. The Pixel 9a was launched in India for 49,999 INR and globally starts at 499 US Dollars.


    Google’s new Pixel 9a has recently been reviewed by DxOMark, and the results are now available. Similar to the other models in the Pixel 9 series, it has earned respectable scores in both camera and display categories. Let’s dive into the details.

    Camera Performance

    In the evaluation of its camera, Google’s Pixel 9a scored 153 points, placing it at 33rd in the global smartphone rankings. Remarkably, it secured the top spot in the high-end category, which encompasses upper mid-range smartphones. The tests conducted by DxOMark showed that the Pixel 9a incorporates many of the high-end features found in the pricier Pixel 9.

    Display Quality

    The camera boasts a solid dynamic range, precise exposure, and vibrant colors. However, it does face challenges with zoomed shots due to the absence of a dedicated telephoto lens. Additionally, the Pixel 9a encounters difficulties in dim lighting conditions for both photos and videos. DxOMark also assessed the display, awarding it a score of 155 points, which is again the highest in its category. Notably, the Pixel 9a even made it into the global top 10, landing at the 8th position.

    The review highlights that the display is excellent for various activities, including standard web browsing and watching videos. The Pixel 9a features a lively and clear screen that responds swiftly and accurately to touch. This model was launched in India earlier this month with an initial price of 49,999 INR, while it can be found globally starting at 499 US Dollars.

  • Pixii Max vs Leica M10 and M11: DxOMark Sensor Analysis

    Pixii Max vs Leica M10 and M11: DxOMark Sensor Analysis

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Pixii Max is a digital rangefinder camera from France, featuring a 24MP full-frame sensor, and is priced at €4,799.
    2. It is significantly cheaper than the Leica M11, which costs €8,750, but does not match the Leica’s performance.
    3. The Pixii Max received a DxOMark rating of 93 points, while the Leica M11 scored 100 points, making the Pixii Max a solid option for its price range.
    4. The Pixii Max has better low-light performance compared to the Leica M10, which has a similar sensor but a lower score of 86 points.
    5. Overall, the Pixii Max is considered a competitively priced alternative to the Leica M10, with no significant weaknesses in its sensor performance.


    Anyone interested in purchasing a digital rangefinder camera currently has just one option apart from the Leica M-Series, and that is the Pixii from France. Initially, this camera was launched featuring a 26MP APS-C sensor, but now the company offers the Pixii Max, which comes equipped with a 24MP full-frame sensor.

    Pricing and Comparison

    The starting price for the base model, which includes 32GB of internal storage, is €4,799. While this isn’t exactly budget-friendly, it’s still nearly €4,000 cheaper than the Leica M11, whose official price stands at €8,750. A fresh analysis from DxOMark indicates that the Pixii Max does not match the performance of the 60MP full-frame sensor found in the Leica M11, which has been rated as the top sensor of its class by DxOMark up to now.

    Performance Insights

    The Leica M11 achieved a DxOMark rating of 100 points, while the Pixii Max was rated at 93 points. This score puts it slightly ahead of the Pixii Plus with its APS-C sensor, but seven points behind the more affordable Nikon Z7 II. For those who are passionate about rangefinder cameras, the Leica M10 serves as a relevant reference; it also has a 24MP full-frame sensor but scores lower at 86 points. Interestingly, a used Leica M10 in decent condition is priced similarly to a new Pixii Max.

    Advantages of the Pixii Max

    One of the key benefits of the Pixii Max compared to both the Pixii Plus and the Leica M10 is its low-light performance, as it maintains a comparable image quality at an ISO that’s half a stop higher. Overall, the sensor in the Pixii Max displayed no significant weaknesses, leading DxOMark to conclude that it is a competitively priced alternative to the Leica M10.

    Source:
    Link


     

  • Xiaomi 15 Ultra Leica Camera Review: Zoom King or DxOMark Fail?

    Xiaomi 15 Ultra Leica Camera Review: Zoom King or DxOMark Fail?

    Key Takeaways

    1. Xiaomi 15 Ultra has not made it to the top ten in DxOMark camera scores, continuing a trend for the brand.
    2. The device scored well in zoom and texture performance, earning top marks in these areas.
    3. DxOMark praised the Xiaomi 15 Ultra for detail, dynamic range, and texture management in photos and videos.
    4. Critiques included inconsistent photo quality and issues with artifacts like ghosting and flares.
    5. Video stabilization on the Xiaomi 15 Ultra was noted as less effective compared to competitors.


    Xiaomi generally faces challenges with DxOMark. Amazingly, no Xiaomi phone has made it to the top ten for camera scores until now, and the Xiaomi 15 Ultra continues this trend. However, this device did manage to score two to three favorable results in the camera assessments conducted by the French evaluation team. Even though it fell significantly behind the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max, the Google Pixel 9 Pro, and the leading Huawei Pura 70 Ultra, which sits at 13th place, the new Xiaomi flagship, featuring a Leica camera setup, did manage to clinch the top spot for both zoom and texture performance.

    Camera Performance Insights

    DxOMark highlighted that the Xiaomi 15 Ultra showcases impressive detail across all focal lengths, alongside a strong dynamic range in both photos and videos. Additionally, it excels in texture and noise management. On the downside, DxOMark’s evaluation pointed out several areas where Xiaomi stumbled. For example, the consistency of photos was questioned, with testers noting that images taken in succession do not always yield similar outcomes. There were also issues with various artifacts, including ghosting and flares, despite Xiaomi promoting Leica Ultrapure Optics in its advertising. Video stabilization reportedly isn’t as effective as that of some rival models.

    Review Highlights

    The detailed review comes with a variety of sample photos and videos, allowing you to compare this phone with others. In a separate post on social media by DxOMark, you can find several side-by-side comparisons of telephoto zoom capabilities that tend to favor the Xiaomi Ultra 15. Interestingly, some viewers disagree with the ratings given by DxOMark, and their reviews often face scrutiny. It’s up for debate whether such concerns are well-founded or not.

    Source:
    Link