Tag: Tesla Model 3

  • Mercedes CLA Sedan vs Tesla Model 3: 400-Mile Range and Specs

    Mercedes CLA Sedan vs Tesla Model 3: 400-Mile Range and Specs

    Key Takeaways

    1. Mercedes targets Tesla Model 3 as main rival for the new CLA electric sedan, priced about $10,000 higher but offering more value.
    2. The CLA features an 85 kWh battery, achieving a range of 694-792 km, significantly surpassing the Model 3’s 530 km range.
    3. Fast charging capabilities allow for 200 miles of range in just 10 minutes using a high-power charger, with a typical charge from 10% to 80% taking about 22 minutes.
    4. Advanced engineering includes a Disconnect Unit (DCU) for enhanced efficiency, smart recuperation methods, and a low drag coefficient of 0.21 for better range.
    5. The CLA introduces the Mercedes-Benz Operating System (MB.OS) for advanced software functionality, including over-the-air updates and generative AI capabilities for driver interaction.


    At the recent event announcing the new Mercedes CLA electric sedan, the CEO of Mercedes-Benz openly stated that the main rival they are targeting is the Tesla Model 3.

    While it is true that the Mercedes CLA comes with a price tag that’s about $10,000 higher than the Model 3, it provides significantly more value for that extra cost.

    Impressive Battery and Range

    Equipped with a substantial 85 kWh battery and boasting impressive efficiency, the CLA achieves a range of between 694-792 km (WLTP) on a single charge. In contrast, the Model 3 can only manage 530 km under the same testing conditions. When the Mercedes CLA launches in the US next quarter, it will be one of the electric vehicles with the longest range per charge, potentially achieving an EPA estimate of up to 420 miles.

    This model marks the first electric vehicle built on the Mercedes Modular Architecture platform, designed for mass production. It features an 800V powertrain system, allowing for quicker charging and more efficient motors, providing up to 200 miles of range in just 10 minutes when using a 320+ kW charger like Tesla’s V4 Superchargers, or 9 hours with a home charging solution like the Tesla Wall Connector.

    Fast Charging and Performance

    A typical charging session from 10% to 80% takes about 22 minutes, which is faster than what Tesla’s 800V Cybertruck can achieve, as its 4680 battery lags behind other charging technologies.

    The rear-wheel drive (RWD) version of the Mercedes CLA delivers 268 horsepower, while the all-wheel drive (AWD) variant is rated at 349 hp, reaching 0-60 mph in just 4.8 seconds. Interestingly, the range of the AWD model, named CLA 350 4MATIC with EQ Technology, is only marginally less than that of the RWD model.

    Mercedes attributes this efficiency to the introduction of the Disconnect Unit (DCU), which is being used in a car for the first time within its C-class lineup. The 107 HP front electric motor is only activated during crucial moments of acceleration or when traction is needed, and it shuts down immediately after, which can “reduce parasitic losses at the front axle by up to 90 percent and enhances electric range.”

    Advanced Engineering Features

    To achieve the remarkable efficiency of the Mercedes CLA and surpass the Tesla Model 3’s range, there are various engineering innovations in place, such as smart recuperation methods during braking and a record low drag coefficient of 0.21.

    Mercedes claims that the CLA provides an exceptionally quiet and smooth ride, with its larger size allowing for increased passenger and cargo space. Inside, buyers can choose to have up to three screens, including an option for passenger displays or head-up displays.

    Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of the new CLA is its focus on software functionality. This vehicle is the first to use the Mercedes-Benz Operating System (MB.OS), which integrates infotainment and driver-assist features. Over-the-air (OTA) updates will allow drivers to access new functions as they become available. The car’s MBUX Virtual Assistant also utilizes generative AI capabilities from ChatGPT and Google Gemini, enabling it to engage in fluid conversations with the driver on any topic needed.

    Mercedes will also provide a smaller 58 kWh battery option at a lower price point, along with a hybrid version featuring a petrol engine for those who aren’t ready to make the full transition to electric just yet.

    Source:
    Link

  • This Chinese EV Could Challenge Tesla Model Y Dominance

    This Chinese EV Could Challenge Tesla Model Y Dominance

    Key Takeaways

    1. Tesla is facing increasing competition in China, particularly from Xiaomi’s electric vehicles.
    2. In January, Tesla sold 8,000 Model 3s, while Xiaomi’s SU7 outsold it with 22,000 units sold.
    3. The Xiaomi SU7 offers features like a larger battery, better driving range, and a lower price point than the Model 3.
    4. Demand for the Xiaomi SU7 is rising, indicated by a significantly longer wait time for delivery.
    5. Xiaomi plans to release the YU7 later this year, which may challenge the Tesla Model Y in sales.


    Competition in the electric vehicle (EV) market is intense worldwide, but Tesla is feeling particularly challenged in China. In January, the Model 3 was outperformed by the Xiaomi SU7, and the upcoming YU7 might follow suit by surpassing the Model Y.

    Sales Figures

    Reports indicate that Tesla China sold 8,000 Model 3 vehicles in January, while Xiaomi managed to deliver 22,000 SU7 units in its home market. The SU7 boasts several attractive features like a larger battery, superior driving range, a heads-up display, and even a mini refrigerator. Additionally, it comes at about $2,500 less than the Model 3.

    Future Prospects

    This trend looks poised to persist. A wait time that is ten times longer suggests that demand for the Chinese EV is growing. However, this could also work in Tesla’s favor, as some eager buyers might opt for the Model 3 instead.

    What’s uncertain is if the soon-to-be-released Xiaomi YU7 will surpass the Model Y in terms of sales. It’s noteworthy that Xiaomi is already employing Tesla’s ‘gigacasting’ technique to produce the SU7 and is also utilizing the ‘structural battery pack’ design. With the production insights they’ve accumulated and a list of competitive features, Xiaomi could be gearing up to release a serious contender to the Tesla Model Y.

    Upcoming Launch

    Xiaomi announced that the YU7 will begin its production later this year.

    Source:
    Link

  • Tesla Model 3: America’s Cheapest Car to Own by Just $43

    Tesla Model 3: America’s Cheapest Car to Own by Just $43

    Automotive industry experts have been signaling for quite some time that while electric vehicles could be less expensive to manufacture and maintain, increasing repair expenses and insurance rates might negate those benefits.

    Study Findings

    A recent study highlights that the Tesla Model 3 ranks as the most economical car to own among the top-selling mass market vehicles in the United States, with the Model Y also making it into the top ten of this list.

    The total yearly ownership cost of the Model 3 sits at $5,061, which is just $43 less than the next vehicle on the list, a gasoline-powered Hyundai Elantra. Following closely is the Toyota Corolla, which has annual expenses of $5,182, not much above that of the Model 3.

    Cost Breakdown

    The small difference in yearly ownership costs between Tesla’s least expensive electric model and others is largely because its low fuel and upkeep expenses are outweighed by its elevated premiums, fees, and taxes.

    For instance, the typical cost to insure a Tesla Model 3 in the U.S. is $2,241, compared to $1,511 for a Corolla. Moreover, Model 3 owners shell out an average of $1,041 for fees and taxes, double what Hyundai owners generally pay.

    Tesla Model Y Comparison

    Similarly, the Tesla Model Y, which ranks as the seventh most cost-effective vehicle to operate in the U.S., has its low charging costs of $708 and maintenance fees of $1,339 overshadowed by its hefty insurance premiums of $2,399 annually, second only to the Model S.

    Indeed, Tesla vehicles are the priciest to insure among mass-market cars in America, and the study does not even take into account the Cybertruck, which is not classified as a best-selling mass-market vehicle.

    Insurance Challenges

    The high insurance costs are attributed to the scarcity of parts, the complex gigacast components that are hard to repair, and the expensive battery replacements that often lead insurers to declare an EV a total loss after a serious accident instead of repairing it.

    Rental company Hertz faced this reality when it ordered 100,000 Model 3 cars from Tesla and quickly flooded the second-hand market with them just two years later, citing price declines, slow repair processes, and soaring insurance expenses.

    Rising Taxes

    Moreover, many states have begun to increase road taxes on electric vehicles, arguing that their heavier weight causes more wear and tear on public roads, contributing to the growing expenses of EV ownership.

    Nonetheless, the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y do have one clear advantage over gasoline-powered vehicles: their yearly fuel and maintenance costs are significantly lower than those of internal combustion engine cars.

    Source:
    Link

  • Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD Hits 408 Miles on One Charge

    Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD Hits 408 Miles on One Charge

    Tesla’s Model 3 Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive (LR RWD) has gone well beyond its stated EPA-rated range of 363 miles (584 km), with a real-world test showing it achieved 408 miles (656 km) on just one charge. This impressive feat was highlighted by a user on X/Twitter, David (@dkrasniy), who posted a picture of the car’s dashboard readings, catching the eye of both electric vehicle fans and skeptics.

    Efficient Energy Consumption

    The post’s image shows that the 408-mile journey was accomplished with an energy use of 184 Wh/mile, which is notably higher than usual daily driving efficiency. The dashboard also notes a total energy consumption of 75 kWh for the trip, which is quite close to the Model 3’s battery capacity.

    Competitive Pricing

    Earlier this year, Tesla reintroduced the Model 3 LR RWD, advertising a 363-mile EPA-rated range, making it one of the top options for long-range in the Model 3 series. This vehicle is promoted as a blend of cost-effectiveness and extended range, with a price tag of $42,490 in the United States. It features Tesla’s latest efficiency upgrades and incorporates advanced powertrain software. Though the advertised range has been surpassed in the past, these new figures are indeed remarkable.

    Implications for Buyers

    The 408-mile achievement exceeds the EPA rating by over 12%. Most electric vehicles typically do not surpass their rated range in real-life conditions due to elements like weather, terrain, and driving habits. The dashboard image shared also includes more details from the trip.

    This information should intrigue potential buyers, as the Model 3 makes a compelling argument for long-range electric cars. While not every driver may replicate the same outcomes as demonstrated in the test, this real-life example offers valuable insights into the vehicle’s capabilities. Additionally, Tesla’s new lease buyout policy, which also applies to the Model 3, will make this electric vehicle an even more attractive option.


    Image 1
  • Tesla Model 3 Passes Truck Crash Test with Top Performance

    Tesla Model 3 Passes Truck Crash Test with Top Performance

    Tesla vehicles have consistently received top marks in crash tests conducted by various international transportation safety organizations.

    This impressive performance can be attributed to the low center of gravity created by the heavy battery situated at the bottom of these electric cars, as well as smart chassis design aimed at absorbing as much kinetic energy from a collision as possible before it impacts the cabin where drivers and passengers sit.

    Recent Crash Test Results

    The latest testament to Tesla’s remarkable safety features comes from the challenging trailer crash test administered by the Chinese DCAR Institute for Collision Safety.

    This isn’t the infamous Devil’s Drill Card test, where a car crashes into a stationary semi-truck, sliding underneath it while another vehicle hits it from behind. However, it is still one of the toughest crash assessments one can encounter for any automobile.

    In the trailer drill test, the Model 3 excelled, becoming the only car out of around 30 to pass with outstanding results. The Model 3 managed to slide under the truck, barely touching the A-pillar before bouncing back, while many other vehicles suffered deformation up to the C-pillars.

    Other Vehicles in the Test

    Interestingly, Xiaomi’s first attempt at an electric vehicle, the SU7, also performed well, directing the energy away from the crash test dummies. However, the testers pointed out that panoramic glass roofs do not provide much help in such impact scenarios.

    According to Tesla’s chief engineer Lars Moravy, the Model 3’s chassis is designed with flexibility in mind to gradually absorb kinetic energy during a collision, with the highest levels of force occurring just before reaching the cabin.

    Ultimately, the testers concluded that the passengers in the Model 3 would likely have survived a potentially fatal scenario, such as rear-ending a truck.

    Source: Link,Link


    Image 1
  • Tesla Unveils 2025 Model 3 RWD with Longer Range Battery

    Tesla Unveils 2025 Model 3 RWD with Longer Range Battery

    Tesla is set to upgrade its budget-friendly 2025 Model 3 by adding a bigger battery, as indicated by recent regulatory filings.

    New Battery Details

    The new 6M battery pack will have the same number of cells as the existing Model 3 RWD battery. This suggests that the company may be using a different battery chemistry or a more effective way to package the cells, which could lead to higher energy density.

    In Europe and the UK, Tesla has already launched a Model 3 Long Range version, achieving an impressive 702km (436 miles) on a single charge, a notable increase from the earlier 390-mile capacity.

    Modest Range Improvements

    However, the range increase for the Model 3 RWD in these markets will be less dramatic. According to the filing, the new range will be 520km (323 miles) per charge, which is only a slight improvement over the current rating for the 19-inch wheels.

    Tesla is making this happen with a new 62.5 kWh LFP battery pack sourced from CATL, which maintains the same size and weight as the existing model. It’s worth noting that this isn’t a groundbreaking chemistry, as the energy density indicates that the upgraded Model 3 RWD battery doesn’t utilize CATL’s manganese phosphate type.

    Cost-Effective Strategy

    It seems likely that Tesla aims to reduce costs by opting for CATL’s latest LFP battery pack, which offers slightly better specifications at what is probably a significantly lower price.

    This year, prices for battery-grade lithium have fallen to their lowest due to a decrease in EV demand, and CATL is likely providing attractive packs to Tesla for vehicles made in China that are then shipped worldwide, including to Europe.

    There are speculations that this same battery pack might also be utilized in the Model Y Juniper refresh to keep expenses down, and enhancements to the charging curve could be forthcoming. We will have to wait until Tesla officially reveals the 2025 Model 3 RWD later this month or in the next quarter, which is expected to boast a confirmed range of 520km (323 miles) with the larger and more costly wheel option.

    US Market Changes

    Currently, Tesla no longer offers a base Model 3 version with an LFP battery in the US, as it does not qualify for federal tax credits. Nevertheless, the company has recently updated its range estimate for the LR version with the 19-inch wheels, indicating that it is actively working to enhance the 2025 lineup of its most economical vehicle.

  • Tesla Boosts Model 3 Long Range Estimate with Premium Wheels

    Tesla Boosts Model 3 Long Range Estimate with Premium Wheels

    Tesla has recently been expanding the range of its popular Model Y and Model 3 cars, updating their performance figures positively.

    Updates Following EPA Testing

    These positive adjustments typically occur after Tesla finishes the new EPA range evaluations, leading to updates on previously reported numbers from its more rigorous internal testing system. There was even a pause in deliveries of the Model Y AWD until the EPA tests were completed, resulting in a confirmed longer range on a single charge.

    Efficiency Boost for Model 3 Highland

    In the case of the Model 3 Highland refresh, Tesla has shifted into a mode focused on enhancing efficiency. The internal estimate for the Long Range version’s distance on a charge has been increased, especially when equipped with a specific set of wheels.

    If a buyer opts for the Long Range Model 3 with the $1,000 Nova wheels instead of the standard 18-inch Photons, they will enjoy an 11-mile increase in range. Previously, the Model 3 with the 19-inch Nova wheels was rated for 305 miles according to Tesla’s internal tests, but that has now been raised to 316 miles with the larger Nova wheels and all-season tires.

    Aesthetic and Performance Changes

    This increase in range for the Model 3 when using the pricier wheels is a welcomed change, as the 19-inch wheels look sleek but are larger and have a bit more resistance compared to the standard 18-inch Photon wheels.

    The gap in range between these two types of wheels was quite significant, with the stock wheels outperforming the 19-inch version by a full 41 miles, based on EPA estimates. However, this difference has now been reduced, and Tesla has not disclosed any specific gains in tire efficiency or changes in their testing procedures that may have led to this favorable update.

  • Police Departments Share Mixed Views on EVs as Patrol Cars

    Police Departments Share Mixed Views on EVs as Patrol Cars

    Over the past year, three police departments that switched to electric police vehicles have shared their mixed experiences with these purchases. While Teslas performed poorly in actual patrol situations, Fords showed better results. The insights gained from these departments can assist others in avoiding the purchase of EVs that are not ideal for police duties.

    Specialized Vehicle Needs

    Police cars are typically modified versions of SUVs and sedans provided by manufacturers, but some are just regular vehicles that have been adapted. These cars come with tough tires, high-capacity batteries, additional lights, enhanced cooling systems, stronger shocks, and robust engines, all aimed at helping officers chase down suspects in any conditions. They are also equipped with police terminals, cameras, barriers for rear seats, waterproof seating, gun mounts, and sometimes even bulletproof features, all of which add weight and limit the space inside for officers who carry body armor and gear, along with transporting suspects.

    Challenges with Tesla Models

    Two departments that incorporated Teslas encountered multiple issues when using them as patrol cars. The Ukiah Police Department, located in Northern California, reported that their Tesla Model 3s had notable downsides. One major problem was the small rear seats, which could only accommodate one prisoner. Additionally, the front seats were cramped, making it hard for officers to exit the vehicle comfortably. They also faced long charging times, which could lead to hours of waiting at charging stations during long prisoner transports. Each modified Tesla 3 ended up costing around $150,000.

    The Menlo Park Police Department, situated a few hours south of Ukiah, noticed similar issues with their Tesla Model Ys. A key disadvantage was the inefficiency stemming from the vehicle’s software. Officers reported that the Teslas would unexpectedly stop while pulling over cars, due to the advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) that could not be turned off. This posed challenges during chases. Additionally, the vehicle would automatically lock its doors when the officer with the key walked away, wasting critical time if they needed to return quickly. The touch controls also required multiple taps to turn off lights, which hindered stealthy operations.

    Ford’s Different Experience

    The Fort Bragg Police Department, located an hour north of Ukiah, opted for the Ford F-150 Lightning EV. They faced issues primarily due to the officers’ unfamiliarity with EV charging. This led to a situation where officers were late to an event because they chose a slow Level 1 charging station instead of looking for faster Level 2 or higher options. A 600-mile test using quicker charging stations still required 1.5 hours of wait time for battery recharges.

    Another drawback involved limited range in hilly areas. A couple of trips to the local jail, which is 55 miles away, utilized 80% of the battery. The range of EVs can also decrease significantly in cold weather. Lastly, the department faced challenges finding transformers necessary for installing fast chargers at their station. They reported that the required transformer is delayed by a year due to supply chain problems, forcing them to rely on Level 1 charging.

    Police departments need to think carefully about whether the charging infrastructure, range, or features of pricier EVs fit their requirements, especially when considering additional armor. Aspiring officers wanting to catch criminals can prepare for their police exam by looking for study guides on platforms like Amazon.

  • P7+: First AI Car with Free Self-Driving, No Weather Limitations

    P7+: First AI Car with Free Self-Driving, No Weather Limitations

    With the aim to surpass Tesla in the realm of full self-driving, Xpeng has introduced a direct competitor to the Model 3, priced below $30,000, which includes complimentary full self-driving and autoparking features.

    Competition Intensifies in China

    Several of Tesla’s top rivals in China, such as BYD, Xpeng, and NIO, are rapidly advancing their driver assistance technologies, striving to differentiate themselves and draw in more consumers. This ongoing competition has led to significant innovations and enhancements in the automotive sector.

    Introducing the Xpeng P7+

    A notable example is the new Xpeng P7+ sedan, which directly challenges the Model 3 with its price being 10% lower than Tesla’s most affordable model. Xpeng refers to the P7+ as “the first AI car,” as it utilizes artificial intelligence to manage all aspects of the vehicle, including autonomous driving, energy efficiency, and thermal control for the first time ever.

    This new vehicle showcases Xpeng’s commitment to AI; it’s their initial smart car that doesn’t rely on LiDAR for self-driving operations. Instead, they have adopted Tesla’s method, equipping the P7+ with Eagle Eye vision technology, which they claim provides greater accuracy than their prior LiDAR-based self-driving systems.

    Advanced Technology and Capabilities

    The innovative mix of AI software with camera and sensor technology allows the P7+ to map an area equivalent to two football fields in all weather and road conditions. With Eagle Eye, Xpeng is on track to potentially be the first automotive company to implement its self-driving technology in major cities and along highways by year-end.

    The system supports seamless intelligent driving capabilities, allowing for door-to-door travel and parking space navigation. This stands in stark contrast to Tesla’s full self-driving, which has yet to receive approval in China.

    Specifications That Standout

    When it comes to specifications, the P7+ boasts a slightly longer range than the Tesla Model 3 and operates its self-driving software on two Nvidia Orin X chips, with the cabin entertainment system powered by a high-end Snapdragon 8295 processor.

    The AI-driven powertrain also achieves an impressive efficiency of around 18 kWh per 100 miles, and the P7+ is constructed on a contemporary 800V architecture, enabling rapid charging capabilities.

    Pre-orders have begun at a starting price of $29,610, which might be adjusted downwards before the official launch next month. Tesla is encountering significant rivalry in China, capturing only 6.4% of the new energy vehicle market there last month.

    Xpeng (Weibo) via SCMP

  • Model 3 Performance Range Test Underwhelms, LR RWD Hits 386 Miles

    Model 3 Performance Range Test Underwhelms, LR RWD Hits 386 Miles

    When put through a tough full-to-empty range test on the highway, nearly all Tesla Model 3 variants, except for the highest Performance model, exceeded their EPA estimates, in some cases by a significant margin.

    Best Option for Efficiency

    For those hunting for the most efficient Tesla, the Model 3 Long Range AWD with a Panasonic battery appears to be the best choice right now, just before the Robotaxi arrives.

    This Long Range model performed exceptionally well, surpassing its official EPA estimate of 341 miles by over 20 miles, achieving a total of 365 miles on a single charge. This is nearly as efficient as the Lucid Air Pure, which is known as America’s most energy-efficient electric vehicle.

    Testing Conditions

    The test involved nearly new vehicles driven at a steady speed of 70 mph, with consistent tire pressure, cabin temperature, and load. The cars started from a full charge and continued until the battery was completely drained, close to the starting point, to account for any wind or elevation impacts.

    In this setup, the Model 3 Performance did not do well, running out of battery 15 miles short of its official EPA range of 303 miles. The Model 3 AWD with an LG battery pack was the second least efficient, only managing to exceed its EPA range by 3 miles, while the base RWD version with the LFP battery, which is no longer available in the US, managed to beat its estimate by 5 miles.

    Long Range RWD Performance

    Despite these figures, those are still respectable performances. The new Long Range RWD version, which is the most affordable Tesla, stood out by exceeding its official range estimate by 23 miles, reaching an impressive total of 386 miles on a single charge, the highest of all Model 3 versions.

    It has been recognized for some time that Panasonic provides batteries with superior energy density compared to LG, and the recent highway range test for the Model 3 only reinforces this finding.

    However, it’s worth noting that the high-performance version seems to consume more battery than what its EPA range estimate indicates.