Tag: Geekbench

February 12, 2025
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Surfaces on Geekbench with Top Performance
Key Takeaways
1. The Galaxy S25 Edge shares the same Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset as the Galaxy S25 Ultra, confirmed by Geekbench listings.
2. It has the model number “SM-S937B” and features a clock speed of 4.47 GHz with eight cores and 12 GB of RAM.
3. Performance scores for the S25 Edge include a single-core score of 2806 and a multi-core score of 8416.
4. The Galaxy S25 Edge is expected to launch in the second quarter of the year, likely in May.
5. The projected price for the Galaxy S25 Edge in the United States is $1,099.
Samsung recently revealed the Galaxy S25 Edge at its Unpacked event last month. Although specifics about this sleek, design-oriented flagship phone are still not fully confirmed, a new Geekbench listing has validated that it shares the same chipset as the larger Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Model and Chipset Details
The Galaxy S25 Edge is identified by the model number “SM-S937B,” and it is confirmed to be equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, similar to the other Galaxy S25 models, due to its listed clock speed of 4.47 GHz. Additionally, it shows that it has eight cores, easing concerns that Samsung might use the new 7-core Snapdragon 8 Elite. Like the other models in the Galaxy S25 line, it comes standard with 12 GB of RAM.
Performance Metrics
In terms of performance, the S25 Edge stands tall alongside its competitors. It achieves a single-core score of 2806 and a multi-core score of 8416. While these figures may not reflect the chipset’s peak performance, they are not significantly lower than the average Geekbench scores of the other S25 series devices.
Sales and Pricing Information
According to a recent report, the Galaxy S25 Edge is expected to hit the market in the second quarter—likely in May, if earlier leaks are accurate. It will be positioned between the Galaxy S25 Plus and the Galaxy S25 Ultra, with a projected price of $1,099 in the United States.
Source:
Link
Tags: Geekbench, Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, Snapdragon 8 Elite
February 8, 2025
Next-Gen Motorola Razr Foldable Smartphone Leaked with Specs
Motorola has opted to use Qualcomm’s ‘efficiency-class’ Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset for its Razr+ 2024, which is currently priced at $849.99 as of February 7, 2025, but is available only in the Midnight Blue color. This decision comes even though Samsung has successfully integrated a true 8 Gen 3 flagship SoC into its Galaxy Z Flip6.
Potential Changes Ahead
Recent leaks suggest that the next version of the Razr could address this gap. A new Geekbench listing has surfaced for a Motorola device featuring the 50 Ultra’s 12GB of RAM, but powered by the latest high-end 8 Elite platform, boasting a maximum clock speed of 4.32GHz.
Name Game
Curiously, this device is referred to as the “Razr Ultra 2025” instead of the previously anticipated Razr 60 Ultra. This has sparked discussions that the new clamshell might be marketed under this different name globally.
It’s worth mentioning that this latest leak does not confirm other expected details, including the model number of the “Ultra 2025.” Additionally, it’s intriguing that there has been no information regarding a standard “Razr 2025” up until now.
Source:
Link
Tags: Geekbench, Motorola Razr Ultra 2025, Snapdragon 8 Elite
January 25, 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Benchmark Leak Shows Performance Gains
Now that the GeForce RTX 5090 has been thoroughly examined (you can check out our review here), it’s time to look at the upcoming Blackwell GPU: the GeForce RTX 5080. This GPU features a slight increase in CUDA cores and is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR7 VRAM. However, according to Nvidia’s own tests, this doesn’t translate into a significant boost in performance—at least not without the help of DLSS and other enhancements. We’re now getting insights on how the GeForce RTX 5080 performs in Geekbench and Blender tests.
Performance in Geekbench
In the OpenCL benchmark from Geekbench, the GeForce RTX 5080 achieved a score of 256,138 points. This is just a minor 3% improvement over the GeForce RTX 4080, which has an average score of 247,392 points in our database. On a brighter note, when tested in Vulkan, the RTX 5080 scored 261,836 points, indicating a notable 37% increase compared to its predecessor (190,888). This performance also confirms its boost clock of 2.6 GHz, showing that the GPU doesn’t face throttling issues.
Blender Results
Turning our attention to Blender, the RTX 5080 averages around 9063.77 points, which is approximately 10% quicker than the RTX 4080’s score of 8286.35.
All things considered, the GeForce RTX 5080 does not present a substantial performance upgrade. However, its laptop version shows a much better performance which is promising.
Source:
Link
Tags: Blender, Geekbench, GeForce RTX 5080
January 20, 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop Debuts on Geekbench with Razer Blade 16
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 for laptops has made its first appearance on Geekbench. It comes with the new Razer Blade 16, which features an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor and 32 GB of DDR5 RAM. However, this version isn’t showcasing its full potential, as indicated by its benchmark score.
Performance Numbers
The laptop variant of the GeForce RTX 5090 achieved a score of 91,063 in Geekbench’s OpenCL test. This score is significantly lower than the median score of 190,680 for the GeForce RTX 4090. The reason for this dip in performance is likely due to it operating at a reduced speed of just 1,500 MHz, which is considerably below its peak frequency. Although Nvidia hasn’t officially stated this, we can anticipate it to be slightly above the RTX 4090 laptop’s boost clock of 2,040 MHz.
Testing Limitations
However, it’s important to note that Geekbench isn’t the best benchmark for assessing GPU performance, especially when the GPU is evidently underperforming. It’s quite possible that the Razer Blade 16 is set to a power-saving mode. The listing also provides some important specifications of the GeForce RTX 5090, including 24 GB of VRAM and 82 Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs), which equals a total of 10,496 CUDA cores.
Source:
Link

Tags: Geekbench, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090, Razer Blade 16
January 20, 2025
Oppo Find N5 Geekbench Shows 7-Core Snapdragon 8 Elite Chip
Qualcomm introduced the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset in October 2024. This new chipset has an 8-core configuration and is identified by the part number SM8750-AB. Recently, however, news has emerged about a new 7-core version of this chipset, designated as SM8750-3-AB. There have been claims that the Oppo Find N5 will be the first foldable smartphone to utilize the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset. Nonetheless, it appears that the device will actually be the inaugural one to include the 7-core variant of this chip.
Oppo Find N5 with 7-core Snapdragon Chip
According to the reports, the Oppo Find N5 has two different model numbers: PKH110 and PKH120. The PKH110 model refers to the standard version of the N5, while the PKH120 is linked to the variant with satellite connectivity. The Geekbench listings have now brought to light the PKH100 version of the N5, showcasing some of its essential specifications.
Geekbench Findings
The Geekbench results for the Oppo Find N5 indicate that it operates on the 7-core Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset. It remains uncertain if the satellite communication version of the N5 uses the regular 8-core Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, even though the standard version is confirmed to have the 7-core edition.
The Geekbench listing discloses that the Find N5 is equipped with 16 GB of RAM and runs on Android 15. The single-core test results yielded scores of 2,948 and 3,083, while the multi-core test produced scores of 8,196 and 8,865. The multi-core scores are about a thousand points lower than those of the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite, which can be attributed to the absence of one core in the new chipset.
Performance Implications of Missing Core
While benchmark results can give a rough estimate of performance, they don’t always represent how devices perform in real-life scenarios. For most daily activities, the missing core in the Find N5 likely won’t create a major difference. Modern processors are built to manage various tasks effectively, and most applications don’t fully leverage all cores at once. Yet, for heavy tasks such as gaming or rigorous multitasking, the difference might be felt. The regular Snapdragon 8 Elite’s additional core could offer a slight advantage in those situations, leading to a smoother experience and possibly improved frame rates in games.
The Oppo Find N5 is expected to launch in China in February. There are speculations that it may be rebranded as the OnePlus Open 2 in some regions like the US, Europe, and India.
Tags: Geekbench, Oppo Find N5, Snapdragon 8 Elite
January 15, 2025
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Elite: Competing Devices & Launch Timeframe
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Elite, also known as SM8735, has recently caught some eyes after being listed on Geekbench, showcasing impressive performance stats. An early listing showed its advanced CPU design includes one Cortex-X4 core running at 3.21GHz, three Cortex-A720 cores at 3.01GHz, two more Cortex-A720 cores clocked at 2.8GHz, and two energy-saving Cortex-A520 cores operating at 2.02GHz. Additionally, it comes with an Adreno 825 GPU that runs at 1100MHz. According to Geekbench, the single-core performance is around 1900 points, while the multi-core performance is close to 6000 points, suggesting that this chipset is still being fine-tuned and could see further improvements.
Snapdragon 8s Elite Overview
When comparing the Snapdragon 8s Elite with the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, the Elite offers a notable upgrade in its CPU setup. With its powerful Cortex-X4 core clocked at 3.21GHz, it is expected to deliver superior single-thread performance. The multi-core performance also benefits from the additional high-performance cores, likely exceeding the capabilities of the 8s Gen 3. However, while the Adreno 825 GPU is newer, it may not provide a huge advancement in graphics, as the emphasis remains on CPU efficiency and overall performance.
Comparing Snapdragon 8s Elite and Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
The differences between the Snapdragon 8s Elite and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 are more significant. The 8 Gen 3 is equipped with a stronger Cortex-X4 core, extra high-performance Cortex-A720 cores, and an Adreno 750 GPU, making it better suited for gaming and demanding visual tasks. While the 8s Elite is efficient, it falls short of the raw power and GPU capabilities of the 8 Gen 3, making it a solid mid-range choice instead of a direct rival to Qualcomm’s leading chipset.
Snapdragon 8s Elite Compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite
The Snapdragon 8 Elite represents a major step forward for Qualcomm, featuring custom Oryon cores that are anticipated to outperform the 8s Elite’s ARM-based cores in both single and multi-core tasks. With higher clock speeds and a more sophisticated GPU, the 8 Elite would likely surpass the 8s Elite in benchmarks and real-world applications, particularly in gaming and artificial intelligence tasks.
Tags: Geekbench, Qualcomm, Snapdragon 8s Elite
January 10, 2025
Galaxy S25 Slim Surfaces on Geekbench with Lowest Performance Scores
The Galaxy S25 Slim has shown up on Geekbench, leading to speculation that this smartphone could be unveiled at Samsung’s Galaxy Unpacked event on January 22. The South Korean technology company has not confirmed this yet. However, the benchmark listing provides some intriguing hints about what features it might offer.
Impressive Geekbench Scores
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (model SM-S937U) has made its appearance on Geekbench with notable hardware details. The motherboard, codenamed ‘sun,’ suggests that a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite might be powering this device. Furthermore, the other three models are already confirmed to utilize the same chip.
The listing indicates that this chipset operates on a six-core configuration at a speed of 3.53 GHz, along with two performance cores that run at an impressive 4.47 GHz. With 12GB of RAM, the device achieves a score of 3,005 points in single-core performance and 6,945 points in multi-core testing.
Performance Insights
It’s essential to point out that these performance numbers are not overly remarkable for the Snapdragon 8 Elite, likely due to a cautious approach to performance enhancements. To be fair, other Galaxy S25 variants have made appearances on the benchmark platform multiple times. The base Galaxy S25 achieved 9,355 points in the multi-core test and a single-core score of 2,986 points. The Ultra version performed even better, scoring 3,148 points in single-core and an impressive 10,236 points in multi-core tests.
According to the listing, the Galaxy S25 Slim will be equipped with Android 15 from the start, likely featuring the One UI 7 skin. While there isn’t much additional information from the Geekbench listing, the specifications imply that the Galaxy S25 Slim will not compromise on performance, even though it aims to be a thinner, sleeker option.
Possible Launch Date
For several months now, the Galaxy S25 Slim has been surrounded by rumors and leaks. The recent invitation for the Galaxy Unpacked event has only intensified the excitement, with images showcasing four corners. This has led many to speculate that the S25 Slim could unexpectedly debut alongside the standard, Plus, and Ultra models.
Interestingly, earlier reports suggested that the Galaxy S25 Slim would not launch until Q2 2025, so announcing it this month would be ahead of the expected timeline. Samsung seems to be positioning the S25 Slim as a direct rival to Apple’s forthcoming iPhone 17 Air, which also aims to deliver a slim and lightweight design. You can find some of the rumored specifications for the Slim model here.
Stay updated! Join our Telegram community for the latest news and subscribe to our free daily newsletter for top tech stories!
Source:
Link

Tags: Galaxy S25 Slim, Geekbench, Samsung
December 27, 2024
Redmi Turbo 4 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 & 2: Geekbench Results
MediaTek has just introduced the Dimensity 8400 chipset, marking a first in its category. This new chip will power the upcoming Redmi Turbo 4 and the Realme Neo 7 SE, which are anticipated to be released in January 2025 in China. Additionally, the Poco X7 Pro, set to launch globally, will also feature this chip, as it is believed to be a rebranded version of the Turbo 4. A listing on Geekbench has surfaced, showing the performance metrics for the Turbo 4 for the first time.
Performance Insights of Dimensity 8400
A Xiaomi device with the model number 24129RT7CC has recently received approval from China’s 3C certification platform. This device, which is likely the forthcoming Redmi Turbo 4, has also appeared in the Geekbench database. The device powered by the Dimensity 8400 achieved scores of 1642 in the single-core test and 6056 in the multi-core test. These scores surpass those of the Redmi K70e, which was launched last year as the first phone featuring the Dimensity 8300. While the Dimensity 8400 shows impressive multi-core performance, its single-core results are a bit lacking.
Competing Against Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
The Dimensity 8400 is set to compete with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chip, which scores approximately 18XX in single-core tests and about 48XX in multi-core tests. Interestingly, the D8400 finds itself positioned between the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in multi-core performance rankings.
Expected Features of Redmi Turbo 4
According to the Geekbench listing for the Redmi Turbo 4, the device will feature 16 GB of RAM and run on Android 15, likely with HyperOS 2.0 layered on top.
In terms of specs, the Redmi Turbo 4 is rumored to sport a 6.67-inch OLED display with a resolution of 1.5K and a refresh rate of 120Hz. The Dimensity 8400-powered smartphone is expected to offer up to 16 GB of RAM and up to 512 GB of internal storage, along with a battery capacity of either 6,000mAh or 6,550mAh, supporting 90W charging. It might also include a 20-megapixel front-facing camera and a dual-camera system with a 50-megapixel primary lens with OIS and an 8-megapixel secondary lens. Additional features could comprise an in-screen fingerprint scanner, an IR blaster, and dual speakers.
Tags: Dimensity 8400, Geekbench, Redmi Turbo 4
December 19, 2024
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 Scores Well on PassMark for Single-Threaded Performance
Yesterday, the Ryzen AI 7 350 from Krackan Point made quite an impact on Geekbench, showing a solid performance improvement compared to its Hawk Point variant. However, its performance on PassMark (thanks to @Olrak29_ on X for the info) isn’t as impressive, especially in multicore testing. This is somewhat expected since it has a combination of 4 Zen 5 cores and 4 Zen 5c cores.
Performance Metrics
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 achieved scores of 3,919 and 21,127 points in PassMark’s single-threaded and multithreaded tests, respectively. The single-thread score is similar to that of its Zen 5 sibling, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which scored 3,977. This CPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 45 Watts and includes a Radeon 860M integrated GPU.
Comparing with Previous Generation
In contrast, the previous generation, Ryzen 7 8845HS, had scores of 3,782 and 28,806 in the same benchmarks. This difference is anticipated, given that the Hawk Point version has eight full Zen 4 cores, which results in superior multithread performance. The single-thread performance of the Ryzen AI 7 350 is where it shines, but it loses ground on the multicore front.
Rivalry with Other Processors
Intel’s Lunar Lake-based Core Ultra 7 258V slightly outperforms in single-thread tests with a score of 4,109. Its multithread performance is surprisingly close at 20,018, even without hyperthreading. The unexpected competitor here is Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, which manages to surpass in multithreaded performance with a score of 23,400. However, in single-thread performance, the Krackan Point CPU takes the lead, as the Qualcomm processor scores 3,318.
Naturally, these benchmarks don’t fully capture the true performance of the Ryzen AI 7 350. We’ll have a clearer picture when it officially launches at CES 2025, alongside Strix Halo and a potential refresh of Hawk Point.
Source: Link
Tags: Geekbench, PassMark, Ryzen AI 7 350
December 17, 2024
AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 and New Asus ROG Flow Z13 Leaked
Some time back, the ‘Pro’ version of AMD’s high-end Strix Halo CPU appeared on Geekbench. Now, we have the chance to look at its standard model, which has a long name that is a bit confusing, but not as much. The Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 has been tested, giving us a glimpse into its CPU and GPU capabilities. It is found in an Asus ROG Flow Z13, a unique laptop-tablet combination, which was hinted at by a leak earlier this year.
Performance Insights
The AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 managed to score 2,894 points in Geekbench’s single-core evaluation. This result is quite similar to the Ryzen 9 7945HX from two generations back, which scored 2,880, and the more recent Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 2,857, not to mention the low-power Core Ultra 9 288V, which came in at 2,864. Interestingly, the Strix Halo flagship falls behind the previous-gen Core i9-14900HX, which averaged around 3,016 in our findings.
Optimization Needed
Clearly, the CPU requires some fine-tuning, as demonstrated by Geekbench’s frequency data. The CPU peaks at 5.2 GHz, but the primary listing states its boost clock at 3.939 GHz. Additionally, the memory, which is 24 GB, is shown to operate at a lowly 1,944 MT/s, even though it is supposed to run at 8,000 MT/s. Regardless, the Strix Halo is not expected to launch until next year, giving AMD and Asus time to resolve its issues.
Multicore Performance
Looking at multicore performance, the AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 shows off its sixteen Zen 5 cores with impressive results. It achieves a score of 20,708 points, surpassing all previously mentioned CPUs. Since Strix Point incorporates both Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, the best we can compare it to is the Ryzen 9 7945HX, which had an average score of 16,765. This indicates that Strix Halo provides a 25% performance boost over its Zen 4 predecessor.
In conclusion, while the Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 may outperform its x86 rivals, it is significantly outclassed by Apple’s M4 Pro, which is an Arm-based rival with two fewer CPU cores. Our benchmarking records indicate it scored 3,382 and 22,527 points in Geekbench 6.3. While this doesn’t fully represent a processor’s overall performance, Strix Halo is unlikely to bridge that considerable gap, even with adequate software enhancements.
Source: Link
Tags: AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395, Asus ROG Flow Z13, Geekbench