Tag: Geekbench

March 21, 2025
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Spotted Again on GeekBench
Key Takeaways
1. The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE has returned to GeekBench with a new model number, SM-X526B, indicating a possible regional variant.
2. The tablet features the Exynos 1580 SoC and 8GB of RAM but shows variation in performance scores between different model numbers.
3. In a previous test, the SM-X520 variant scored 1349 (single-core) and 3882 (multi-core), while the SM-X526B scored 1015 (single-core) and 3540 (multi-core).
4. The Galaxy Tab S10 FE will run on Android 15 OS right out of the box.
5. Key specifications include a 10.9-inch IPS LCD display with 2K+ resolution, a 90Hz refresh rate, an 8,000mAh battery with 45W fast charging, a 13MP rear camera, and a 12MP front camera.
Samsung’s Galaxy Tab S10 FE has made a return on GeekBench, showing up again with a new model number and varying performance metrics. This budget flagship tablet is generating buzz as it appears on the well-known benchmarking site for the second time, so let’s dive into the details.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE’s GeekBench Performance
To refresh your memory, this tablet is a Fan Edition branch off of the high-end Tab S10 lineup. This means it packs in some high-end features at a more accessible price. Earlier this month, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE was seen on GeekBench under the SM-X520 model number. It scored 1349 points in the single-core test and 3882 points in the multi-core test, powered by the Exynos 1580 SoC and 8GB of RAM.
New Model Number and Scores
In this latest instance, the Galaxy Tab S10 FE, spotted by Xpertpick, has the SM-X526B model number. This suggests it might be a regional variant. Even though it still houses the same Exynos 1580 chipset and 8GB of RAM, this version scored only 1,015 points in the single-core test and 3,540 points in the multi-core test. It’s interesting to note that synthetic performance can differ, and there are variations in GeekBench results.
Key Specifications and Features
Moreover, the listing verifies that the tablet operates on Android 15 OS right out of the box. A leak earlier this week also shared images of both the Galaxy Tab S10 FE and Galaxy Tab S10 FE+, along with their main specifications. This upcoming device might feature a 10.9-inch IPS LCD display with a 2K+ resolution and a 90Hz refresh rate. It could come with a hefty 8,000mAh battery supporting 45W wired fast charging. For photography, the rear is equipped with a 13MP camera, while the front sports a 12MP selfie camera.
Tags: Exynos 1580, Geekbench, Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
March 18, 2025
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Geekbench Listing Reveals Snapdragon 8 Elite Tablet
Key Takeaways
1. China will see the launch of two tablets, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro and OnePlus Pad 2 Pro, powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite in early 2025.
2. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro has been confirmed on Geekbench with a Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, 16GB of RAM, and running on Android 15.
3. The tablet is expected to debut alongside the Find X8 series in April 2025, potentially making it the first tablet with the Snapdragon 8 Elite.
4. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro features a 13.2-inch LCD display with a 3.4K resolution and a large 12,000mAh battery that supports 80W fast charging.
5. The device scored 2,628 points in single-core and 7,892 points in multi-core tests on Geekbench.
A new leak has indicated that China is set to get two tablets powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite in the first half of 2025. The devices are the Oppo Pad 4 Pro and the OnePlus Pad 2 Pro. The Oppo Pad 4 Pro has been spotted on Geekbench, confirming it will use the specified chipset.
Oppo Pad 4 Pro on Geekbench
Recently, an Oppo tablet with the model number OPD2409 appeared in the Geekbench database. Earlier this month, the same device was also seen with an 80W fast charger on China’s 3C certification site. Sources indicate that the Oppo OPD2409 will be launched as the Oppo Pad 4 Pro in China.
The Geekbench listing shows that the Oppo Pad 4 Pro comes with the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset. While the name of the chipset is not directly mentioned, the details about the CPU and GPU make it clear that it’s the SD8E.
Upcoming Launch and Specifications
There are whispers that the Oppo Pad 4 Pro will make its debut alongside the new Find X8 series, which is expected to be unveiled in April in China. This means that the Pad 4 Pro could become the world’s first tablet to run on the Snapdragon 8 Elite.
Diving back into the Geekbench data, the tablet is said to have a robust 16GB of RAM and runs on Android 15. It scored an impressive 2,628 points in the single-core test and achieved 7,892 points in the multi-core test.
Display and Battery Details
Reports claim that the Oppo Pad 4 Pro will sport a 13.2-inch LCD display with a resolution of 3.4K. It is expected to be powered by a massive 12,000mAh battery that supports 80W charging. Other specifications of the tablet are still not disclosed.
Tags: Geekbench, Oppo Pad 4 Pro, Snapdragon 8 Elite
March 18, 2025
Google Pixel 9a Benchmarks Show It Outperforms Galaxy A56
Key Takeaways
1. The Google Pixel 9a shows strong performance on Geekbench and AnTuTu, surpassing the Galaxy A56 in benchmarks.
2. It scores 1,530 in single-core and 3,344 in multi-core tests on Geekbench, with an AnTuTu score of 1,049,844.
3. The Pixel 9a’s performance may improve before launch due to pre-launch software and potential cooling system limitations.
4. While it performs well for a mid-range device, Google’s Tensor chips typically lag behind Qualcomm in performance and efficiency.
5. Future updates will be important to assess the Pixel 9a’s thermal management and everyday performance capabilities.
The Google Pixel 9a has recently been spotted on Geekbench and AnTuTu ahead of its official release. The performance results indicate that this mid-range device stands strong against its flagship counterparts in the Pixel 9 series. In fact, it even surpasses its rival, the Galaxy A56.
Performance Insights
As per information shared by Sahil Karoul, the Google Pixel 9a, which runs on Google’s Tensor G4 chipset, scored 1,530 in single-core and 3,344 in multi-core tests on Geekbench 6. Additionally, on AnTuTu, it achieved a composite score of 1,049,844, breaking down into a CPU score of 260,567 and a GPU score of 434,441.
Understanding Benchmark Limitations
Although these scores are somewhat lower than those of the pricier Pixel 9 model (with averages of 1,925 single-core and 5,674 multi-core), it’s crucial to remember that the Pixel 9a was using pre-launch software during testing. It probably also has a less efficient cooling system, which might account for the performance gap.
To put this into perspective, the Galaxy A56, another mid-range competitor, scored 1,364 and 3,899 on Geekbench for single and multi-core tests, respectively. Its AnTuTu score of 908,689 does not match the Pixel 9a’s, indicating that the Pixel 9a not only offers robust performance but also benefits from a clean and lightweight user interface.
Considerations on Performance
However, we should keep in mind that Google’s Tensor chips have generally lagged behind Qualcomm’s offerings in both performance and power efficiency. Benchmarks do not fully capture sustained performance, which is crucial for prolonged use—especially if you plan to game for an extended period or record in 4K 60 fps for more than just a few minutes.
While the initial benchmark results look encouraging, we still need to see if the thermal management and performance optimization can support everyday tasks effectively. More updates should come to light as we move closer to the launch date.
Source:
Link
Tags: Geekbench, Google Pixel 9a, Tensor G4
March 8, 2025
Apple M3 Ultra Debuts on Geekbench with New Mac Studio
Key Takeaways
1. The M3 Ultra chip offers significant improvements over the M2 Ultra, including 32 CPU cores and the ability to support up to 512 GB of unified memory.
2. Geekbench scores show a 20% increase in single-core performance and a 30% increase in multicore performance for the M3 Ultra compared to the M2 Ultra.
3. The GPU performance improvements are less pronounced, with a 13% increase in the Metal test and a 9% increase in the OpenCL benchmark.
4. Compared to AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395, the M3 Ultra shows about 9% better single-core performance and 33% better multicore performance, with a 63% advantage in GPU performance.
5. The M3 Ultra-powered Mac Studio starts at $3,999 for 96 GB of RAM, significantly higher than a comparable system with Ryzen AI Max+ 395, which is priced at $1,999.
Apple has quietly unveiled a brand new chip along with the latest Mac Studio. The M3 Ultra, which many thought was scrapped, brings some astonishing improvements over the M2 Ultra, including additional CPU cores and the ability to support up to 512 GB of unified memory. Recent Geekbench results have shed light on how the M3 Ultra compares with its predecessor.
Performance and Specifications
The Mac Studio being discussed is referred to as code-named Mac15,14. Its predecessor, the one featuring the M2 Ultra, is known as Mac 14,14. This indicates that the latter is indeed the new model, as confirmed by its impressive specs including 32 CPU cores and 256 GB of RAM exclusive to the M3 Ultra. According to Apple’s official site, this model is equipped with 80 GPU cores.
In the CPU test conducted by Geekbench 6.4, the M3 Ultra achieved scores of 3,262 and 28,333 points. Its predecessor, the M2 Ultra, managed 2,718 and 21,754 points. This shows a 20% boost in single-core performance and a 30% enhancement in multicore performance. The first improvement comes from an increase in clock speed (4.05 GHz compared to 3.48 GHz) and various upgrades made possible by the M3 architecture. The latter improvement is due to the higher number of CPU cores. However, these remarkable enhancements apply only to the CPU.
GPU Performance
When it comes to graphics, the improvements are less striking. In the Metal test from Geekbench, the M3 Ultra recorded 259,277 points, which is 13% faster than the M2 Ultra’s score of 229,348. A similar pattern emerges in the OpenCL benchmark, where the M3 Ultra (147,719) is about 9% faster than the M2 Ultra (135,233).
The M3 Ultra can be compared to AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395, which scored 2,978 and 21,269 points in Geekbench 6.4’s CPU test, along with 90,181 points in the OpenCL benchmark. In single-core performance, Apple’s M3 Ultra is about 9% superior and approximately 33% faster in multicore tests. On the GPU front, the advantage grows to an impressive 63%. Clearly, the increase in both CPU and GPU cores gives the M3 Ultra a significant edge over the Strix Halo.
Pricing Comparison
Apple still holds a commanding position in the market; however, a fully equipped Strix Halo machine featuring a Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128 GB RAM, and free NVMe SSD slots from Framework can be purchased for just $1,999. In contrast, an M3 Ultra-powered Mac Studio with 96 GB of RAM will cost a staggering $3,999, which also comes with a mere 512 GB of non-upgradable storage.
Tags: Geekbench, M3 Ultra, Mac Studio
March 5, 2025
Realme P3 Ultra Specs: Dimensity 8350 Revealed in Geekbench
Key Takeaways
1. Realme introduced the P3x and P3 Pro in India last month, with hints of upcoming P3 and P3 Ultra models.
2. The Realme P3 is rumored to be a rebranded version of the Realme Neo 7x, featuring the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4.
3. The P3 Ultra, identified by model number RMX5030, has been spotted on Geekbench with a MediaTek chipset related to the Dimensity 8300 and 8350.
4. The P3 Ultra is expected to have 12 GB of RAM, run on Android 15, and potentially offer 256 GB of internal storage.
5. The P3 Ultra is anticipated to be priced under Rs 30,000, competing with the Poco X7 Pro.
Last month, Realme introduced the Realme P3x and Realme P3 Pro in India. This month, there are hints that the company might reveal the rest of the P3 lineup, including the Realme P3 and P3 Ultra. Reports suggest that the P3 could be a rebranded version of the Realme Neo 7x, which features the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 and was recently launched in China. While some information about the Ultra, like its configurations and color choices, was shared in December, its main specifications are still unknown. Recently, XpertPick discovered a Geekbench entry for the Ultra variant, showing details about its chipset.
Realme P3 Ultra Geekbench Listing
According to a post from 91mobiles made in December, the forthcoming Realme P3 Ultra carries the RMX5030 model number. This device has now appeared on Geekbench with a MediaTek chipset identified by the MT6897 model number. This number is linked to the Dimensity 8300 and 8350, both sharing the same CPU and GPU configurations. Nonetheless, the D8350 is touted to offer a superior gaming experience, thanks to its StarSpeed Engine.
Performance Focused Features
Realme markets its P-series smartphones as high-performance devices. Thus, it is probable that the P3 Ultra will be equipped with the Dimensity 8350 chip over the D8300. The Geekbench results also indicate that the device is outfitted with 12 GB of RAM and runs on Android 15 OS.
The previously mentioned report stated that the 12 GB RAM variant of the P3 Ultra might come with 256 GB of internal storage. It also noted that it could be available only in a grey color. The P3 Ultra is anticipated to be priced above the P3 Pro, currently retailing at Rs 26,999 for the 12GB+256GB model. It is expected that the new device will be priced under Rs 30,000 and compete against the Poco X7 Pro, which features the Dimensity 8400 chipset.
Tags: Dimensity 8350, Geekbench, Realme P3 Ultra
February 28, 2025
iPhone 16e Benchmarks Show Strong CPU and GPU Performance
Key Takeaways
1. The iPhone 16e has similar CPU performance to the iPhone 16, with benchmark scores of 3,520 (single-core) and 9,181 (multi-core).
2. Earlier claims of the iPhone 16 having a 10% performance lead over the 16e were proven inaccurate.
3. The iPhone 16e’s GPU performance is weaker than the iPhone 16, with scores of 3,862 (3DMark WildLife Extreme) compared to 4,588.
4. The iPhone 16’s GPU is approximately 18% stronger than that of the iPhone 16e.
5. The iPhone 16e is now readily available for purchase following its launch.
Apple has released its new iPhone 16e, and it’s now easily accessible after its launch last week. Early benchmark results from unknown sources highlighted that the mid-range device’s CPU and GPU are not as powerful as those of the iPhone 16. However, verified tech outlets have now thoroughly tested the iPhone 16e.
Benchmark Performance
According to tests conducted by the well-known site Geekerwan, the iPhone 16e matches the iPhone 16 in terms of CPU performance. It achieved scores of 3,520 for single-core and 9,181 for multi-core on Geekbench 6. In comparison, the standard iPhone 16 received scores of 3,509 and 9,018 in the same tests. This confirms that earlier benchmark claims suggesting a 10% lead for the iPhone 16 were inaccurate. This result is not surprising, considering both models share the same CPU core count and clock speeds.
Graphic Performance
On the other hand, the iPhone 16e falls short against the iPhone 16 in GPU performance. This is due to its less powerful quad-core GPU, while the iPhone 16 boasts a penta-core GPU. In the 3DMark WildLife Extreme test, the iPhone 16e scored 3,862, compared to the iPhone 16’s 4,588. Similarly, in the Nomad Light test, the iPhone 16e scored 1,627, whereas the iPhone 16 achieved 1,916. Therefore, it can be concluded that the iPhone 16’s GPU is approximately 18% stronger than that of the iPhone 16e.
Purchase Options
If you’re interested in upgrading your audio experience, you can buy the Apple AirPods Max on Amazon.
Source:
Link
Tags: Geekbench, iPhone 16, iPhone 16e
February 27, 2025
AMD Radeon 840M Beats 740M in Early OpenCL Benchmark Results
Key Takeaways
1. AMD has launched the entry-level Ryzen AI 5 340 APU, which features Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores along with the Radeon 840M GPU.
2. The Radeon 840M outperforms the previous generation Radeon 740M in the OpenCL benchmark by over 3,000 points, scoring 14,285 points.
3. The Radeon 840M is the least powerful GPU in the RDNA 3.5 series, with only four Compute Units (CUs), compared to higher models like the Radeon 890M and 860M.
4. The Ryzen AI 5 340 may allow affordable laptops to run most AAA games smoothly at lower visual settings.
5. Initial benchmark results may vary from post-launch performance, and single-core and multi-core performance details are still unknown.
AMD has released its entry-level APU for the Krackan Point series, named the Ryzen AI 5 340, and it’s starting to show up in laptops. The Framework 13 is among the first devices to use this new chip. This APU features Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, and it comes with a lower-end RDNA 3.5 GPU, known as the Radeon 840M.
Benchmark Performance
The Ryzen AI 5 340 has recently appeared on Geekbench, giving us a glimpse into how its integrated GPU stacks up against the previous generation. In one benchmark test, the Radeon 840M achieved a score of 14,285 points in the OpenCL test. In contrast, the older Radeon 740M scored approximately 11,000 points.
As a result, in the OpenCL test, the Radeon 840M outperforms the Radeon 740M by more than 3,000 points. It is important to mention that the 840M is the least powerful RDNA 3.5 iGPU in the Krackan Point series, having only four Compute Units (CUs). On the other hand, the top model, the Radeon 890M (found in the Beelink SER9 with AI 9 370 HX priced at $999 on Amazon), boasts 16 CUs, while the slightly upgraded Radeon 860M has 8 CUs and scores around 25,450 points in the same benchmark.
Future Gaming Capabilities
Despite being the entry-level model, the higher OpenCL score of the Radeon 840M suggests it could provide better gaming performance compared to the 740M. This means that affordable laptops featuring the Ryzen AI 5 340 might be able to run most AAA games at lower visual settings quite smoothly.
However, it’s essential to keep in mind that initial Geekbench results can differ significantly from scores collected after the product’s official release. Additionally, it remains uncertain how the Ryzen AI 5 340 will perform in both single-core and multi-core Geekbench tests.
Source:
Link
Tags: Geekbench, Radeon 840M, Ryzen AI 5 340
February 24, 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 20% Slower Than RTX 5070 Ti, Tests Show
Key Takeaways
1. The Nvidia RTX 5070 will release on March 5, with a price of $549, making it the most affordable option in the RTX 50 series.
2. Benchmark leaks indicate the RTX 5070 is around 20% slower than the RTX 5070 Ti, with OpenCL and Vulkan scores of approximately 187,414 and 188,712, respectively.
3. The RTX 5070 features 6144 CUDA cores and 12GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5070 Ti has 8960 CUDA cores and 16GB of VRAM.
4. Despite being slower in benchmarks, real-world gaming performance differences between the RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 Ti may not be as significant.
5. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT appears to be slightly slower than the RTX 5070 in benchmark tests but may offer better gaming performance; direct comparisons are still pending.
The Nvidia RTX 5070 is set to release on March 5, which means it’s the perfect moment for benchmark results to emerge. A recent leak from Geekbench indicates that this GPU might perform around 20% slower than the RTX 5070 Ti. As the most affordable of the four announced desktop GPUs in the RTX 50 series, the RTX 5070 comes with a price tag of $549. Even though it’s the slowest option, Nvidia is still comparing it to the top model from the previous generation, the RTX 4090.
Benchmark Findings
Alleged Geekbench results for the RTX 5070 display OpenCL and Vulkan scores on a system equipped with the Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X870E HERO motherboard, an AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU, and 32GB of DDR5 RAM. The specific variant of the GPU used in these tests is not confirmed, but the OpenCL score registered at 187,414, while the Vulkan score was 188,712. In contrast, the RTX 5070 Ti achieved scores around 236,000 for Vulkan and approximately 240,000 for OpenCL.
Performance Insights
This indicates a performance gap of over 20% between the two GPUs in benchmark tests. However, it should be noted that these results may not accurately reflect real-world gaming scenarios. While the RTX 5070 Ti is undoubtedly faster than the RTX 5070, the performance difference in actual gameplay might not be as noticeable as the benchmarks suggest. The RTX 5070 is equipped with 6144 CUDA cores and 988 AI TOPS Tensor cores, while the Ti version has 8960 CUDA cores and 1406 AI TOPS Tensor cores. Additionally, the 5070 includes 12GB of VRAM, whereas the 5070 Ti comes with 16GB.
Comparison with Competitors
Moreover, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT has shown to be slightly slower than the RTX 5070 in comparable Geekbench tests. However, performance data from Videocardz hints that it might excel in gaming performance compared to the RTX 5070, even though a direct head-to-head comparison between the two has not yet been conducted.
Source:
Link
Tags: Geekbench, Nvidia RTX 5070, RTX 5070 Ti
February 19, 2025
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and 9900X3D Outperform Zen 4 in Geekbench
Key Takeaways
1. AMD has not yet announced pricing or availability for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and Ryzen 9 9950X3D, but a Geekbench listing suggests a launch may be imminent.
2. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D shows a performance improvement of around 12% in single-core and 10% in multi-core tests compared to the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
3. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is approximately 7% faster in single-core performance compared to the Ryzen 9 7900X3D, with multi-core results being similar.
4. Both new CPUs are expected to excel in gaming performance due to their 3D V-cache and may feature a reverse CCD design similar to the 9800X3D.
5. Ryzen 9 processors are anticipated to have better overclocking potential compared to Ryzen 7 models due to their premium silicon quality.
After making a splash at CES 2025, AMD has been rather quiet about the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and Ryzen 9 9950X3D. We still don’t have any info on the pricing or when they will be available, but a recent listing on Geekbench indicates that these CPUs might be launching soon. Interestingly, the test setup used an older X670E motherboard and was equipped with 32 GB of DDR5-4800 MT/s RAM.
Performance Highlights
Examining the Ryzen 9 9950X3D, it achieved scores of 3,363 and 20,465 in Geekbench’s single and multi-core tests, respectively. For context, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D recorded scores of 3,002 and 18,551 in the same benchmarks. This shows an improvement of around 12% in single-core and about 10% in multi-core performance. On the other hand, the Ryzen 9 9900X3D obtained 3,274 and 19,227 points, making it roughly 7% quicker than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D in single-core performance, while multi-core results were almost the same. It’s important to note that these results come from a single test on a pre-production unit, and performance may enhance once the CPUs are officially launched.
Gaming Performance and Features
Regarding pure performance, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Ryzen 9 9900X3D are expected to deliver similar improvements as other Zen 5 processors. However, the true benefits will likely shine in gaming scenarios, where the CPUs’ 3D V-cache will have a significant impact. Although not yet confirmed, both processors are expected to feature the reverse CCD design seen in the 9800X3D and should allow for overclocking. Ryzen 9 chips typically represent the cream of the crop from a silicon wafer, suggesting they may overclock better than the Ryzen 7 models.
Source:
Link
Tags: Geekbench, Ryzen 9 9900X3D, Ryzen 9 9950X3D
February 12, 2025
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge European Variant Spotted on Geekbench
Key Takeaways
1. Samsung launched the Galaxy S25 series, including the Galaxy S25 Edge, with model numbers varying by region (SM-S937, SM-S937U for the US, SM-S9370 for China, SM-S937B for Europe).
2. The Galaxy S25 Edge is confirmed to run on the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, with no Exynos version available.
3. The European variant features 12 GB of RAM, Android 15, and achieved Geekbench scores of 2806 (single-core) and 8416 (multi-core).
4. It has a slim design (5.84mm thick), a 6.7-inch S-AMOLED LTPO display with a 120Hz refresh rate, and a 3,900mAh battery supporting 25W charging.
5. Expected features include One UI 7, 512 GB internal storage, and a camera setup with a 200-megapixel primary sensor, with a launch anticipated in April or May 2025.
Last month, Samsung introduced the Galaxy S25, S25 Plus, and S25 Ultra across various global regions. During the launch event, the company hinted at a new device named the Galaxy S25 Edge, which will be revealed at an upcoming date. This phone has the model number SM-S937; the version for the US is designated as SM-S937U, while the one intended for China is labeled SM-S9370. Recently, the European version, identified as SM-S937B, appeared on Geekbench, confirming some already known specifications.
Geekbench Insights
The Geekbench entry for the SM-S937B indicates that it runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy. Although the exact name of the chipset isn’t directly stated, the information regarding the CPU and GPU can be deduced from the source code found within the listing. This suggests that, similar to the US variant, the European market will also receive the Snapdragon version of the S25 Edge. It seems there won’t be an Exynos model available for this device.
Specifications and Performance
The European variant of the Galaxy S25 Edge boasts 12 GB of RAM and operates on Android 15. It achieved a score of 2806 in the single-core test and 8416 in the multi-core test. Recent information has indicated that the S25 Edge is designed to be exceptionally slim, with a thickness of just 5.84mm. It is likely to sport a 6.7-inch S-AMOLED LTPO display that supports a 120Hz refresh rate and can reach brightness levels of up to 2,600 nits. The battery is expected to have a capacity of 3,900mAh, supporting both 25W wired and wireless charging.
Anticipated Features
It’s expected that the Galaxy S25 Edge will come with One UI 7 based on Android 15. The device may include 12 GB of RAM alongside 512 GB of internal storage. The rear camera setup might feature a 200-megapixel Samsung HP2 primary sensor and a 12-megapixel ultra-wide lens. As for the launch timeline, the S25 Edge is anticipated to be unveiled in either April or May of 2025.
Tags: Geekbench, Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, Snapdragon 8 Elite