Key Takeaways
1. Design and Size: The Vivo X300 is smaller and lighter (150.57 × 71.92 × 7.95 mm, 190 g) compared to the larger and heavier X300 Pro (161.98 × 75.48 × 7.99 mm, 226 g).
2. Display Differences: The X300 features a 6.31-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 2640 × 1216, while the X300 Pro has a larger 6.78-inch display with a resolution of 2800 × 1260 and a slightly better screen-to-body ratio.
3. Camera Specifications: The X300 has a 200 MP primary camera, while the X300 Pro offers a 50 MP gimbal-stabilized main camera and a 200 MP Zeiss telephoto lens, supporting 8K video versus the X300’s 4K.
4. Battery Capacity: The X300 Pro has a larger 6,510 mAh battery, offering longer standby (20.9 days) and talk times (28.1 hours) compared to the X300’s 6,040 mAh battery (19 days standby, 23.4 hours talk).
5. Unique Features: The X300 Pro Photographer Edition supports Beidou satellite messaging for communication, which is not available on the X300, and includes a multi-spectral sensor for enhanced color and ambient light data collection.
The Vivo X300 series showcases the brand’s newest flagship offering, combining Zeiss lenses, cutting-edge AI processing, and the MediaTek 3 nm Dimensity 9500 chip. Although both devices share the same foundational hardware, the X300 and X300 Pro vary in their camera features, build, and several important aspects. Let’s take a deeper dive into their standout specifications and distinctions.
Size and Design Differences
The Vivo X300 is designed to be smaller and lighter, whereas the X300 Pro is bigger and more robust. The dimensions for the X300 are 150.57 × 71.92 × 7.95 mm with a weight of 190 g, in contrast to the X300 Pro’s 161.98 × 75.48 × 7.99 mm and a heftier weight of 226 g.
Display Features
In terms of screens, the X300 has a 6.31-inch AMOLED display boasting a resolution of 2640 × 1216 and a 19.54:9 aspect ratio. The X300 Pro, on the other hand, upgrades to a 6.78-inch display with a resolution of 2800 × 1260 and a 20:9 aspect ratio. The Pro also achieves a slightly enhanced screen-to-body ratio of 94.85%, compared to 94.66% for the standard model.
Both devices utilize the same MediaTek Dimensity 9500 processor, which is built on a 3 nm architecture, featuring an 8-core setup (1×4.21 GHz, 3×3.5 GHz, and 4×2.7 GHz), along with a Mali-G1 Ultra GPU.
Memory and Connectivity
The only slight difference in specifications is seen outside the CPU and GPU — the Vivo X300 Pro 1TB Photographer Edition comes with LPDDR5X Ultra Pro four-channel RAM and includes satellite communication support, offering marginally improved memory bandwidth and extra connectivity options. That said, the core performance remains identical across both devices.
The X300 has a 200 MP primary camera with typical OIS, while the X300 Pro features a 50 MP gimbal-stabilized main camera aimed at enhanced motion and low-light capture. The telephoto lens varies as well — the X300 includes a 50 MP sensor with 3× optical zoom, while the X300 Pro upgrades to a 200 MP Zeiss APO lens with 3.5× optical zoom. The Pro model also supports 8K video recording, unlike the X300 which has a 4K restriction.
Battery Life Comparison
When it comes to battery life, the difference between the two models is in capacity and longevity. The Vivo X300 Pro is equipped with a larger 6,510 mAh battery compared to the X300’s 6,040 mAh, leading to longer standby times (20.9 days against 19 days) and talk times (28.1 hours vs. 23.4 hours).
Both smartphones run on OriginOS 6, which is based on Android 16, and they support dual 5G connectivity over major global bands. Furthermore, they come with Wi-Fi 7 (2.4 GHz, 5.1 GHz, and 5.8 GHz) featuring 2×2 MIMO and MU-MIMO, Bluetooth 5.4 supporting various codecs such as SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0, NFC, and a USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C interface that allows for DP projection and OTG reverse charging.
Unique Features of the Pro Model
A key distinction is that the Vivo X300 Pro Photographer Edition provides support for Beidou satellite messaging, enabling short-message communication through satellite networks, which isn’t available on the standard X300.
Both models, the Vivo X300 and X300 Pro, are equipped with an extensive array of sensors, including an accelerometer, ambient light sensor, proximity sensor, gyroscope, and electronic compass. They also feature front and rear color temperature sensors, a 3D ultrasonic single-point fingerprint sensor, a laser focus sensor, infrared remote control, a Flicker sensor, and an X-axis linear motor.
The only significant difference is that the X300 Pro is fitted with a multi-spectral sensor, which Vivo claims is utilized for gathering color and ambient light data. In contrast, the X300 has a Hall sensor for detecting magnetic accessories.
If you’re interested in the variants and pricing options for the Vivo X300 series, you can check them out here — one for the X300 Pro and another for the X300.
Source:
Link