Tag: RTX 5090

  • Asus Launches 3000W PSU for Four RTX 5090 Graphics Cards

    Asus Launches 3000W PSU for Four RTX 5090 Graphics Cards

    Key Takeaways

    1. Asus introduced the Pro WS 3000W Platinum PSU, capable of powering four RTX 5090 GPUs simultaneously.
    2. The PSU is 80+ Platinum rated and adheres to ATX 3.1 standards with advanced cooling features.
    3. It includes protective measures against moisture and dirt, and has enhanced heatsinks and a long-lasting fan.
    4. The PSU supports high loads, allowing for a total of 2300 to 2400W for four GPUs, with additional capacity for other components.
    5. Pricing and availability for the Pro WS 3000W, along with 2200W and 1600W models, have not been announced.


    Computex showcases many exciting hardware innovations that often push technology boundaries, and Asus had something remarkable with a 3000W power supply. This ATX PSU can support not just two or three but four RTX 5090 GPUs simultaneously. The company made sure to focus on cooling features to maintain optimal performance over extended periods. This PSU is part of a lineup that also offers 2200W and 1600W models. Currently, there is no information on pricing or when it will be available.

    Details on the Pro WS 3000W

    The Asus Pro WS 3000W Platinum PSU, as indicated by its name, is an 80+ Platinum rated power supply with a capacity of 3000W. It adheres to the latest standards for power efficiency and connectivity. It is compatible with ATX 3.1 and features four native 12V-2×6 connectors with gold-plated pins, which can simultaneously power four GPUs, including the high-end RTX 5090s. However, having four GPUs in a gaming setup is not very common, so this PSU is primarily designed for intensive AI tasks.

    Advanced Features and Design

    The PCB is safeguarded with a protective layer to avoid short circuits caused by moisture or dirt. It also has heatsinks that feature “twice the volume of standard designs” and a dual-ball bearing fan that boasts a lifespan of 80,000 hours. Additionally, the Pro WS 3000W Platinum PSU is equipped with etched cables that are claimed to work at temperatures 50 degrees Celsius lower than the safety threshold. Asus backs this PSU with a solid 10-year warranty.

    In regard to its ability to support four RTX 5090s, each GPU has a maximum load rating of 575W, meaning four of them could draw between 2300 and 2400W when fully loaded. This would leave around 600 to 700W for other components, which is likely sufficient.

    Availability and Other Models

    As previously mentioned, Asus has not disclosed the pricing or availability details for the Pro WS 3000W Platinum PSU. This series also includes 2200W and 1600W power supply units, both of which are also rated 80+ Platinum and comply with ATX 3.1 standards.

    Source:
    Link

  • RTX 5090 Laptop GPU vs RTX 4090: 25-Game Benchmark Results

    RTX 5090 Laptop GPU vs RTX 4090: 25-Game Benchmark Results

    Key Takeaways

    1. The RTX 5090 laptop GPU shows a 20% performance advantage over the RTX 4090 in synthetic tests but doesn’t translate to significant gaming performance gains.

    2. In a broader gaming context, both the RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 perform similarly, with only slight advantages in some cases.

    3. At lower resolutions like 1080p, CPU performance impacts GPU performance analysis, complicating comparisons between models.

    4. The performance gap at 1440p and 4K is minimal, with the RTX 5090 only showing a 0.6% and 3% increase over the RTX 4090, respectively.

    5. Key advantages of the RTX 5090 include 24 GB VRAM, improved efficiency, and DLSS Multi-Frame Generation, but the RTX 4090 may be a better investment for most users.


    We did an analysis of the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 laptop GPUs, and it shows these boards offer a solid performance advantage over their previous generation models in synthetic tests. For example, the RTX 5090 laptop outperformed the RTX 4090 laptop by as much as 20% in the 3DMark test suite. Nevertheless, this synthetic performance does not effectively translate into gaming performance, especially for the RTX 5090.

    Performance in Gaming

    Although the RTX 5090 laptop was 20% quicker than the RTX 4090 laptop for some individual games like Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty during our tests, it appears that the new GPU does not hold any edge over the RTX 4090 when evaluated in a broader context. The 25-game benchmark from Jarrod’sTech indicates that the RTX 5090 laptop and the RTX 4090 laptop perform largely on par.

    Importance of Resolution

    Before diving into the actual performance details, it’s worth noting that we have not considered the 1080p results. At lower resolutions, such as 1080p, CPU performance plays a bigger role, which complicates the process of determining the precise GPU performance.

    When tested at 1440p, the RTX 5090 laptop GPU only manages to be a slight 0.6% faster than the RTX 4090 laptop GPU. This includes the notably poor performance of the RTX 5090 laptop in Red Dead Redemption 2. Even if we ignore the Red Dead Redemption 2 score, the RTX 5090 laptop shows a meager 1.6% lead over the RTX 4090 laptop GPU.

    4K Performance Insights

    The gap in gaming performance between the RTX 5090 laptop and the RTX 4090 laptop isn’t significantly better at 4K. Both GPUs perform quite similarly, with JT’s testing revealing only a 3% increase in performance for the RTX 5090 laptop GPU. This is with the Red Dead Redemption 2 results included. However, removing Red Dead Redemption 2 from the equation doesn’t improve things for the RTX 5090 laptop.

    When looking at frame rates, the RTX 5090 laptop GPU averages 66 FPS across the 25 games tested at 4K, while the RTX 4090 laptop is nearly the same at 64.5 FPS. The results at 1440p also reflect this trend, with the RTX 5090 laptop GPU and the RTX 4090 laptop GPU averaging 107 and 106 FPS, respectively.

    Final Thoughts

    Ultimately, the RTX 5090 laptop GPU’s advantages are limited to its 24 GB VRAM, improved efficiency, and DLSS Multi-Frame Generation (MFG). However, it’s doubtful that anyone spending over $3,000 or $4,000 on a premium gaming laptop will prioritize efficiency. Buyers of high-end gaming laptops expect top-tier performance.

    Thus, if you don’t plan to use MFG and have no need for 24 GB of VRAM, the previous generation RTX 4090 gaming laptops are evidently a better investment.

    Source:
    Link


  • Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered Performance Issues on PC

    Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered Performance Issues on PC

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered shows poor performance with persistent stutters, even on high-end hardware.
    2. A new patch removed DLSS, FSR, and various graphical settings, leading to continued frame rate issues.
    3. The game is demanding on both CPU and GPU, with open-world gameplay suffering from visual fluidity.
    4. Lowering graphical settings provides minimal performance gains that don’t justify the drop in quality.
    5. Despite performance issues, Oblivion Remastered has attracted over four million players, highlighting nostalgia among fans.


    The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion made waves when it hit consoles and PCs in 2006. Recently, a Digital Foundry technical review showed that the remastered version doesn’t perform much better. Persistent stutters interfere with the improved textures and realistic lighting, even on the best CPUs and GPUs. Alex Battaglia mentioned that the performance of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered is considered “one of the worst running games he has ever tested.”

    Patch Issues

    A new patch for Oblivion Remastered removed DLSS, FSR, and various graphical settings on the PC Game Pass version. Even when upscaling is back, the game struggles to maintain a steady frame rate and shows a disappointing frame-time graph. Digital Foundry did their tests using an Nvidia RTX 5090 GPU alongside either a Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor. Even at 1080p with DLSS performance options activated, stuttering was common on both lower and higher-end CPUs.

    Performance Challenges

    Oblivion Remastered is surprisingly demanding on both CPU and GPU. In confined spaces, the gameplay often runs smoothly across a variety of hardware. Just like its predecessor, the vast open world draws players in but sacrifices visual fluidity. Regrettably, decreasing settings like Ray Traced-based Lumen global illumination shows limited improvement. The RTX 5090 coupled with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D achieved frame rates above 60 fps, yet stutters were still evident.

    The review suggests beginning with the High preset and adjusting the hardware lighting mode down. However, after making these changes, the drop in graphical quality doesn’t justify the slight performance gains. Digital Foundry wrapped up by stating that The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered’s performance urgently needs a patch for better optimization.

    Player Engagement

    Despite its fluctuating frame rates, Oblivion Remastered has drawn in over four million players. Nevertheless, the stuttering is a memory that nostalgic fans wish Bethesda could have left behind in the past.

    Source:
    Link

  • RTX 5090 Power Connector Burns, Damages PSU Cable

    RTX 5090 Power Connector Burns, Damages PSU Cable

    Key Takeaways

    1. Another case of a burnt power connector on an MSI RTX 5090 GPU has been reported, adding to existing incidents in the RTX 50 Series.
    2. The damage includes burnt and melted connection points on the GPU’s power connector and the PSU cable, with visible deterioration at the PSU end.
    3. The affected GPU was used for about a month at stock settings without any overclocking.
    4. The PSU cable was a stock 12VHPWR cable from a Corsair SF1000L, chosen due to concerns over custom cables.
    5. The 12VHPWR connector is rated for 600W, matching the RTX 5090’s power draw, raising concerns about inadequate load balancing in the GPU series.


    There has been another incident involving a burnt power connector on an RTX 50 series GPU, according to reports. A Reddit post highlights the burnt power connector on an MSI RTX 5090, along with damage to the cable at the PSU end. This case adds to the list of burnt connector problems documented in the RTX 50 Series 12VHPWR Megathread, bringing the confirmed total to five. The GPU was bought around a month ago and was functioning without any overclocking.

    Details of the Incident

    In the post by user ‘Roachard’, the damage to their MSI 5090 GAMING TRIO OC’s power connector is clearly visible, with several burnt and melted connection points, plus burnt pins on the PSU cable. Notably, the cable also shows damage at the PSU end. The user mentioned that it was a stock PSU 12VHPWR cable that came with the Corsair SF1000L, chosen specifically due to other reports of melting issues with custom cables.

    Examination of the Damage

    The plastic connector on the PSU side has a noticeable bulge, and the cable appears to have burnt white. It remains uncertain if that specific port on the PSU is now dysfunctional or if the PSU itself has sustained damage. Roachard noted that the GPU was acquired approximately a month ago and was being operated at stock settings.

    Technical Insights

    The setup included an Asus Strix B650E-I motherboard paired with a Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU. Comments on the post suggest that the issue might stem from inadequate load balancing on the RTX 40 and 50 series GPUs. Additionally, the 12VHPWR is rated for a maximum power delivery of 600W, which matches the power draw of the RTX 5090 under load, leaving little to no headroom for safety.

    Source:
    Link


  • GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop Benchmarks: 10% Slower Than RTX 5090

    GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop Benchmarks: 10% Slower Than RTX 5090

    Key Takeaways

    1. Performance Gap: The mobile RTX 5080 is 10 to 15 percent slower than the mobile RTX 5090 based on benchmark tests.

    2. Game Performance: The performance difference is more noticeable in demanding games and at 4K resolutions, while it decreases at lower resolutions.

    3. DLSS Effect: The performance advantage of the RTX 5090 over the RTX 5080 remains consistent, regardless of whether DLSS is enabled or disabled.

    4. Value Consideration: The small performance difference suggests that choosing the RTX 5080 could be more cost-effective than opting for the RTX 5090.

    5. Potential Savings: Selecting laptops with the RTX 5080 may result in savings of hundreds of dollars while still providing strong performance.


    Laptops with Blackwell GPUs are starting to appear on the market just as manufacturers have promised. Now that the high-end mobile RTX 5090 has been extensively tested, it’s time to look at how the mobile RTX 5080 stacks up. It’s not surprising that the performance difference between the mobile RTX 5080 and the mobile RTX 5090 is similar to the difference seen between the mobile RTX 4080 and the mobile RTX 4090.

    Performance Comparison

    3DMark benchmarks from our two Schenker Neo 16 test units, which both feature the same Ryzen 9 9955HX processors, indicate that the RTX 5080 model is about 10 to 15 percent slower than its more expensive counterpart. This gap is evident when playing actual games like Baldur’s Gate 3, Final Fantasy XV, Alan Wake 2, or Assassin’s Creed Shadows. As usual, the performance difference is larger at 4K resolutions in demanding games, while at lower resolutions, where graphics are less reliant on the GPU, the difference shrinks.

    DLSS Impact

    An interesting point to note is that the performance difference between the mobile RTX 5080 and mobile RTX 5090 stays constant regardless of whether DLSS is turned on or off. For instance, when playing Assassin’s Creed Shadows with DLSS activated, the mobile RTX 5090 still holds a 15 percent advantage over the mobile RTX 5080.

    Conclusion on GPU Selection

    The relatively minor performance gap between these two high-end GPUs suggests that it could be more beneficial to choose laptops with the RTX 5080 rather than the RTX 5090. This choice could lead to savings of hundreds of dollars or potentially offer better value for performance per dollar spent.

  • RTX 5090 Laptop GPU Gaming Benchmarks vs. RTX 4090 Performance

    RTX 5090 Laptop GPU Gaming Benchmarks vs. RTX 4090 Performance

    Key Takeaways

    1. Nvidia has unveiled the RTX 5090 laptop variant at CES, but it is not yet available for purchase due to throttling issues affecting initial performance.
    2. The RTX 5090 shows impressive gaming performance, with a 33% speed increase over the RTX 4090 in Black Myth: Wukong and a 69% advantage in Hogwarts Legacy.
    3. In Cyberpunk 2077, the RTX 5090 only outperformed the RTX 4090 by 12%, while achieving a 48% gain in Marvel Rivals.
    4. The RTX 5090 features significant upgrades, including 24 GB of GDDR7 VRAM compared to the 16 GB in the RTX 4090, and benefits from Nvidia’s internal enhancements and optimizations.
    5. As Nvidia refines the RTX 5090, there is anticipation for its real-world performance once officially launched.


    Even though Nvidia has technically unveiled the RTX 5090 laptop variant at CES, it still hasn’t been available for purchase anywhere. The initial Geekbench results were not impressive due to throttling issues, which might explain Nvidia’s delay in the official launch. YouTuber Dave2D has recently shared some gaming benchmarks for the Blackwell flagship, which was likely running on the new Razer Blade 16, paired with an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

    Impressive Performance in Gaming

    When testing Black Myth: Wukong, the GeForce RTX 5090 showed a 33% increase in speed compared to the RTX 4090 at 1600p with DLSS Balanced settings. In Hogwarts Legacy (Ultra Settings, RT on), the Blackwell managed an impressive 69% advantage. However, in Cyberpunk 2077 with RT overdrive, the RTX 5090 only outperformed the RTX 4090 by 12%. Lastly, in Marvel Rivals, it achieved a 48% performance gain over the Ada Lovelace with settings maxed out.

    Significant Specification Improvements

    These results align with expectations because the RTX 5090 boasts a significant spec upgrade over the RTX 4090, featuring 24 GB of GDDR7 VRAM compared to the 16 GB found in the RTX 4090. Nvidia’s own tech demo at GDC showcased similar performance improvements. Coupled with Nvidia’s internal Blackwell enhancements and clever software optimizations, this should easily lead to substantial performance gains—potentially even doubling or tripling across generations. However, like most laptop components, the effectiveness of the GPU will depend heavily on the power it receives.

    Conclusion and Future Outlook

    Dave2D has provided valuable insight into the RTX 5090’s capabilities, highlighting its potential in the gaming market. As Nvidia continues to refine the technology, gamers and enthusiasts alike are eager to see how this new GPU will perform in real-world scenarios once it officially launches.

  • Nvidia Zorah Tech Demo: The Future of Near-Photorealistic Game Graphics

    Nvidia Zorah Tech Demo: The Future of Near-Photorealistic Game Graphics

    Key Takeaways

    1. Nvidia’s “Zorah” tech demo showcases neural rendering to improve graphics efficiency by replacing traditional shaders with AI-based neural networks.
    2. The demo runs on Unreal Engine 5 and utilizes Nvidia’s RTX 5090 to achieve nearly photorealistic visuals with realistic lighting and shadows.
    3. An updated version of the demo was released on March 13, receiving praise for its artistic quality, though concerns about its practical application in gaming remain.
    4. A preview of the DirectX 12 Agility SDK supporting neural rendering will be available in April through a partnership with Microsoft.
    5. Nvidia plans to release Unreal Engine 5 plugins for developers, but the timeline for implementing this technology in game development is still uncertain.


    Nvidia has introduced an innovative tech demo named “Zorah,” which highlights the power of neural rendering. This AI-based technology is designed to boost efficiency in handling complex graphics by substituting traditional shaders with trained neural networks. The aim is to enhance image quality while simultaneously improving performance. Additional insights can be found in a blog post from Nvidia.

    Tech Demo Features

    The Zorah tech demo operates on Unreal Engine 5 and has been specifically crafted utilizing Nvidia’s unique RTX branch (NvRTX), a specialized version of the engine. It is powered by the latest RTX 5090, which is the flagship model in the 5000 series, striving to provide visuals that are nearly photorealistic, complete with authentic lighting and shadow effects. Nvidia first demonstrated this technology back in January:

    Recent Updates

    On March 13, an updated iteration of the tech demo was unveiled, showcasing even greater detail:

    YouTube users have lauded the artistic quality and visual excellence of the tech demo. Nonetheless, its stationary nature has led to questions about whether these advancements are truly ready for integration into game development. Some commenters have humorously noted potential low frame rates, making remarks like ‘RTX 5090: 17 FPS’ or ‘Without DLSS: 4 FPS.’

    Future Collaborations

    In partnership with Microsoft, a preview edition of the DirectX 12 Agility SDK that supports neural rendering will be launched in April. Nvidia also plans to provide various Unreal Engine 5 plugins for developers. However, it is yet unclear when and how this cutting-edge technology will be utilized in the realm of game development.

    YouTube / Nvidia GeForce

    Image source: Nvidia

    Source:
    Link


     

  • RTX 5090 Price Gouging: Gaming PC Maker Shocked by $3,000+ GPU

    RTX 5090 Price Gouging: Gaming PC Maker Shocked by $3,000+ GPU

    Key Takeaways

    1. The RTX 5090 is the top-performing GPU in the RTX 50 series, but it has very low availability, making it hard to find at a fair price even 1.5 months post-launch.
    2. Price gouging is a major issue, with distributors quoting prices between $3,050 and $3,100 for basic RTX 5090 cards, affecting system builders like PowerGPU.
    3. There is significantly more availability of RDNA 4 RX 9000 GPUs compared to the RTX 50 series, highlighting a disparity in stock levels.
    4. The struggles of companies like PowerGPU to obtain RTX 5090s at reasonable prices raise concerns about scalping and price inflation for consumers.
    5. Nvidia needs to take action to address the availability and pricing issues surrounding the RTX 5090.


    Much has been discussed regarding the poor debut of the RTX 50 series. Interestingly, the top-performing GPU in this series, the RTX 5090, has the least availability. Even after 1.5 months since it was released, finding the RTX 5090 at a fair price is nearly impossible.

    Price Gouging Issues

    The situation is so bad that even system builders are affected by RTX 5090 price hikes. A recent video from PowerGPU’s CEO on X highlights the challenges in obtaining RTX 5090s from distributors post-launch. More troubling is that a company like PowerGPU is unable to acquire these GPUs at a reasonable cost. The CEO mentioned that distributors are quoting prices between $3,050 and $3,100 for even the most basic RTX 5090 AIB cards. He conveyed that the PowerGPU team feels “gross” and “disgusted” about this whole scenario.

    Comparison with RX 9000 GPUs

    The founder of PowerGPU also claims there is significantly more availability of the RDNA 4 RX 9000 GPUs compared to the RTX 50 series. Previously, we covered how PowerGPU highlighted a striking contrast in stock between the RX 9070 XT and the RTX 5090.

    This predicament for PowerGPU sheds light on the extent of scalping and price inflation. If businesses that have contracts and connections with distributors are struggling to obtain RTX 5090s without facing outrageous prices, it raises questions about what ordinary consumers can do. We can only wish for Nvidia to take quick actions to rectify this situation.

    Source:
    Link

  • Juggernaut RTX 5090 System Dominates GPU Compute Benchmark

    Juggernaut RTX 5090 System Dominates GPU Compute Benchmark

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 initially underperformed on PassMark, scoring lower than the RTX 4090 and at RTX 4080 levels in GPU Compute tests.

    2. PassMark updated its testing methodology to support 64-bit components, allowing the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 to better showcase their performance capabilities.

    3. After the update, the RTX 5090’s average GPU Compute score improved significantly from 23,050 Ops/Sec to 30,178 Ops/Sec.

    4. High-end system configurations, such as those with an Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and 48 GB of RAM, can achieve impressive scores (e.g., 225,048 Ops/Sec) that highlight the RTX 5090’s potential.

    5. The advancements in testing and system setups emphasize the importance of having the right configuration to fully leverage the performance of high-end graphics cards like the RTX 5090.


    Over 100 samples of the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 graphics card have now been tested on PassMark’s platform, and the GPU Compute scores are looking significantly better. Earlier, the new Blackwell card faced challenges on the site, falling behind the RTX 4090 in overall performance, while it was nearly stuck at RTX 4080 levels for GPU Compute. The RTX 50-series cards seemed to be limited by their advanced tech, as PassMark had been using a 32-bit testing framework, but Nvidia had dropped support for OpenCL 32-bit in its latest graphics cards.

    Update on Testing Methodology

    Recently, PassMark implemented a patch for their site, allowing the GPU Compute test to use 64-bit components. This change means that graphics cards like the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 can now show their actual performance capabilities. Although the official high-end video card rankings on the site haven’t been updated yet, the RTX 5090 page is already showcasing significant improvements in GPU Compute. Previously, the average score for the GeForce RTX 5090 in this benchmark was a rather disappointing 23,050 operations per second (Ops/Sec), compared to 28,240 Ops/Sec for the RTX 4090. It was surprising to see the RTX 5090 underperform on PassMark, especially given its strong results in our tests. Thankfully, the score for the Blackwell card has risen to a much more respectable 30,178 Ops/Sec.

    Impressive System Configurations

    Moreover, the recent visits by a few RTX 5090-based systems to the site have revealed some serious powerhouses. For example, even before the patch was available, one test run involving a PC with an Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and 48 GB of RAM on an Asus ROG Maximus Z890 Apex motherboard achieved an incredible score of 225,048 Ops/Sec in GPU Compute. This score is almost 10 times higher than the previous average score for the RTX 5090 and roughly 7.5 times faster than the latest average result. While the average score is crucial for understanding the overall performance of a graphics card like the GeForce RTX 5090, this remarkable score demonstrates that with the right setup, gamers and PC builders can really maximize the benefits of their $2,000+ investment.

    Source:
    Link


  • GeForce RTX 5090 Beats RTX 4090 in Graphics Card Benchmark

    GeForce RTX 5090 Beats RTX 4090 in Graphics Card Benchmark

    Key Takeaways

    1. The RTX 5090 has fallen to second place in PassMark’s G3D Mark benchmark, overtaken by the RTX 4090.
    2. The average score for the RTX 4090 increased, while the RTX 5090’s average score decreased due to more extensive testing samples.
    3. Possible reasons for the RTX 5090’s performance dip include driver issues, limited sample size, and missing Raster Output Pipelines (ROPs) in some models.
    4. The RTX 5090 outperforms the RTX 4090 in DirectX 12 tests, showing a +39.3% advantage in average frames per second.
    5. Despite having more CUDA cores, the RTX 5090 lags behind the RTX 4090 in GPU compute benchmarks by -17.5%.


    As gamers anxiously anticipate the performance of the new Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070, the flagship RTX 5090 appears to be facing some challenges. After recently achieving the top position on PassMark’s G3D Mark benchmark list, the RTX 5090 has now fallen to second place, overtaken by the RTX 4090. Initially, the Blackwell card had a slight lead of +2.85% over the Ada Lovelace model, but further testing of both cards has eliminated that small edge.

    Performance Shifts

    Since our last update, a significant number of RTX 4090 graphics cards have been evaluated, leading to an increase in its average score from 38,422 to 38,436 based on 14,422 tests. Meanwhile, the testing pool for the GeForce RTX 5090 has expanded from 13 to 50 samples, causing its average score to drop from 39,516 to 38,048, resulting in a decrease of -3.71%. This fluctuation indicates that there remains a possibility for the RTX 5090 to regain its leading position in this benchmark if more samples are tested in the future. The tests conducted cover DirectX versions 9 to 12, along with GPU compute evaluations.

    Possible Explanations

    There are several reasons that might explain this surprising turn of events. Driver problems have been reported, with some RTX 5090 units allegedly malfunctioning post-software updates. The sample size for the Blackwell card is still relatively limited, particularly when compared to the RTX 4090. Additionally, it has come to light that certain GeForce RTX 5090 models were lacking Raster Output Pipelines (ROPs), which are crucial hardware components for image rendering. The limited availability of units will also influence the number of graphics cards eligible for benchmarking.

    DirectX 12 Performance

    It’s important to note that the RTX 5090 does outperform the RTX 4090 in DirectX 12 tests, boasting a significant advantage of +39.3% in average frames per second (209 vs. 150). However, as previously mentioned, the GeForce RTX 5090 lags in the GPU compute benchmark by -17.5%, even though it has +32.8% more CUDA cores than the RTX 4090, which are necessary for executing parallel processing tasks. While it’s too soon to claim that Nvidia is not keeping up, these results may give gamers pause when considering such a pricey piece of hardware.

    Source:
    Link