Tag: right-to-repair

  • Tesla Ships Parts to Owners for DIY Repairs with Cybertruck Wiring

    Tesla Ships Parts to Owners for DIY Repairs with Cybertruck Wiring

    Tesla is expanding its self-repair program by offering parts directly to its vehicle owners. While you can’t buy the $15,750 Model Y battery, you can get items like brake rotors and calipers.

    New Offerings for Owners

    Previously, Tesla only provided basic items such as replacement wipers or air filters. Now, they are adding more components to their direct-to-consumer catalog, which is expected “to be expanded with future releases.” California’s right-to-repair law may be influencing this change, especially since Tesla has recently shared an interactive wiring diagram for the Cybertruck. This change is beneficial for owners, allowing them to perform simple repairs themselves and avoid service center visits.

    Pricing and Availability

    For example, you can order the Model Y brake rotors, part number 1188611-00-A, for $160 directly from Tesla, with a delivery time of about a week. Currently, these repair parts can only be sent to a US address. This suggests that Tesla’s willingness to sell parts directly is partly due to the right-to-repair movement at both the state and federal levels, which has even prompted companies like Apple to provide repair parts, tools, and diagrams to third-party repair shops.

    Previous Ordering Process

    In the past, if someone wanted to do a simple brake job, they had to order the part to be delivered to a Tesla Service Center and then pick it up from there. The only Tesla vehicle without any direct-to-consumer repair parts listed in its Electronic Repair Catalog is the Cybertruck, which is understandable due to production ramp challenges. As the Cybertruck becomes more widely available and early adopter vehicles need services like brake replacements, it’s likely that Tesla will add more Cybertruck parts to their catalog.

    You can also find the Power Stop carbon fiber ceramic brake pads for the Tesla Model Y on Amazon.

    Source: Link

    Tags: , ,
  • Lenovo ThinkPad T16: Why Right to Repair is Rare in Laptops

    Lenovo ThinkPad T16: Why Right to Repair is Rare in Laptops

    Repairing gadgets not only helps the planet, it also cuts down costs. The “right to repair” movement has become a hot topic in the tech world recently, with new companies like Framework bringing attention to this issue.

    Keyboard Vulnerabilities

    One component of laptops that is prone to damage is the keyboard. This mechanical section can get easily harmed, whether from a spill or a key being ripped off. This creates a compelling reason to make this part easier to swap out.

    Changing Repairability

    In the past, fixing laptop keyboards was generally straightforward. Unfortunately, that’s not the case today, as many brands now tightly integrate the keyboard into the laptop’s design. With the trend towards thinner laptops, allowing for keyboard replacement could compromise the overall structure. But really, what should take priority: a sleek design or the ability to repair the laptop?

    Exceptions to the Rule

    Some laptops still break this trend. A prime example is the Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3, which we recently examined. This large-screen business laptop from the renowned ThinkPad series features a keyboard that can be swapped out in just a few minutes. The user needs to unscrew two screws on the bottom, and the keyboard easily slides out. This is because the keyboard is not built into the top cover; it stands alone as a separate piece.

    Even in the realm of business laptops, this repair-friendly aspect is now uncommon—why is that? If manufacturers fail to provide such straightforward and effective options for making laptops more repairable, they open themselves up to criticism from the right to repair movement, and they deserve it.

    Source: Link

    Tags: , ,
  • Spectra Smartwatch: Customization & Repair for Tech Lovers

    Spectra Smartwatch: Customization & Repair for Tech Lovers

    Pocuter has kicked off its Kickstarter campaign for the new Spectra Smartwatch, presenting a fresh approach to the high-end smartwatch market. Emphasizing the right to repair, the Spectra features an ESP32-S3, a sleek aluminum frame, and numerous sensors to create an inviting experience for tech lovers. Early bird units can be snagged for about $217, making it a tempting deal for potential buyers.

    Design and Accessibility

    The Spectra showcases a CNC-machined aluminum outer casing, held together by just seven screws, ensuring easy access to the internal components. Additionally, Pocuter has crafted all internal parts to be modular, simplifying the repair process significantly. For those seeking a more luxurious option, there’s a stainless steel version available, which offers enhanced durability and attractiveness.

    Powerful Internals

    Underneath, the Spectra operates on a top-tier ESP32-S3, boasting impressive specifications like 8 MB of RAM and 32 MB of flash storage. It also comes with an nRF52832 co-processor to enhance battery longevity, which Pocuter suggests can last for weeks. This co-processor also improves Bluetooth connectivity and overall efficiency. Users can expand their storage beyond the 32 MB, thanks to a micro SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.

    Display and Software Features

    The Spectra will come equipped with a 368×448 OLED screen, delivering a vibrant visual experience. A hacker watch wouldn’t be complete without a plethora of I/O options, and the Spectra is set to meet those needs. Below is an overview of what to expect when the Spectra watch officially launches.

    The watch will operate on Pocuter’s own SpectraOS, which incorporates hardware abstraction to maintain compatibility with future versions of the device. This means users can rest easy knowing their apps will continue to function with new iterations. With such foresight, it’s evident that Pocuter is building a smartwatch platform designed to last, even though the Spectra is still in its development phase. For further details or to reserve your unit, please check out the Kickstarter page linked below.

    [Pocuter Spectra on Kickstarter]

    Tags: , ,
  • Google Updates Controversial Repair Policy to Work with Customers

    Google Updates Controversial Repair Policy to Work with Customers

    The earlier repair policy for Pixel devices indicated that devices with non-authorized parts should not be sent to Google for repair. If someone ignored this policy, they risked not getting their device back. This policy had been effective since mid-2023.

    Unauthorized Parts Clause

    The previous policy explicitly stated:

    Unauthorized Parts: You will not send in a Device containing non-Google-authorized parts – if You do, Your Device will not be returned to you.

    This policy recently gained attention thanks to right-to-repair advocate Louis Rossman. In response, Google informed Android Authority that they would be updating the policy.

    Google’s Response and Policy Update

    Google has now revised its repair policy. The new policy states that if Google decides not to return a device with unauthorized parts due to health and safety concerns, they will at least contact the user and work towards a solution.

    The updated clause reads:

    Unauthorized Parts: If You send a Device containing non-Google-authorized parts for repair, in certain situations (e.g., safety), the Service Provider may not be able to repair Your Device. Service Provider will return Your Device except when health or safety requirements prevent us from doing so. If the Service Provider can’t return Your Device, Google will work with You on the next steps.

    Implications of the Updated Policy

    The revised policy now leaves room for the service provider to decide whether to repair the device. This means Google could potentially repair and return devices if they consider the unauthorized parts safe. If the device is deemed unsafe, they will collaborate with the user on the next steps.

    As illustrated, the new policy remains somewhat open-ended. It may still take some time for Google to coordinate with users to return devices without compromising health and safety. Your device will either be returned fixed, as is, or through further steps worked out with Google.

    Tags: , ,
  • Apple Fights Against Right-to-Repair Bill Endangering Its Device Repair Monopoly

    Apple Fights Against Right-to-Repair Bill Endangering Its Device Repair Monopoly

    On February 8, 2024, the Oregon State Legislature introduced a bill, SB 1596, that challenges the common practice of component encryption by manufacturers like Apple. This bill stands out from others in states like California by requiring companies to provide the needed documentation, tools, and parts for repairs. It also bans the encryption of components that limit third-party repairs and the use of non-original parts.

    Credit: iFixit

    Apple Clashes With New Right-to-Repair Legislation

    Apple, a major supporter of component encryption, strongly opposes this bill. The company argues that encrypting components helps make repairs more convenient and keeps devices and personal data secure. John Perry, a senior member of Apple’s security design team, says that the legislation would force manufacturers to allow parts from unknown sources, risking device security.

    Debate Over Consumer Rights and Device Security

    During the legislative hearings, a notable moment came from a video testimony by cybersecurity expert Tarah Wheeler, who highlighted Apple’s firm stance on maintaining control over device repairs. This perspective aligns with Apple’s broader argument that the bill could dilute the security and integrity of device ecosystems by opening the door to third-party components and repair services not vetted by the original manufacturers.

    Apple has also pointed to recent updates in its repair processes as evidence of its efforts to accommodate consumer needs for more accessible repair options. These updates have streamlined the process for replacing components, eliminating the need for customers to directly engage with Apple support for such activities.

    The Balance Between Consumer Advocacy and Manufacturer Concerns

    The debate centers around the balance between consumer rights to repair and the security and integrity of devices. Apple has historically utilized component encryption to prevent the use of unauthorized parts, citing security concerns. For instance, replacing a screen with a non-Apple part could lead to the disabling of features like Face ID. While replacing the battery can trigger a “Service” message and disable the battery health monitoring feature in the settings.

    SB 1596 represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing discussion around right-to-repair legislation, highlighting the tension between consumer advocacy for more open repair ecosystems and manufacturers’ concerns over security and proprietary control. As the bill progresses through the legislative process, the tech industry and consumers alike will be watching closely to see how this balance is navigated.

    Tags: , ,