Tag: Intel 14A

  • Intel Foundry’s 14A Technology Praised by Customers as Game-Changer

    Intel Foundry’s 14A Technology Praised by Customers as Game-Changer

    Key Takeaways

    1. Intel’s 14A node is gaining positive feedback from clients, indicating strong competitiveness in datacenter, PC, and mobile sectors.
    2. Despite the promise of 14A, major smartphone SoC manufacturers like Qualcomm and MediaTek continue to prefer TSMC/Samsung for chip production.
    3. Intel Foundry is expected to produce Apple’s M7 chip using the 14A node, with potential future collaboration for iPhone chips.
    4. The 14A node will utilize ASML’s high-NA EUV machines, which may lead to higher production costs.
    5. Intel’s advanced packaging technologies, EMIB and Foveros, are attracting interest from key industry players, including Nvidia and possibly AMD.

    Veteran analyst Patrick Moorhead has revealed new insights into Intel’s forthcoming 14A node. Clients who have experienced it are claiming that “14A is the real deal,” indicating its strong competitiveness in important sectors like datacenter, PC, and mobile. The specific reference to mobile chips raises eyebrows since Intel Foundry hasn’t yet landed a deal with smartphone SoC manufacturers, such as Qualcomm, which continues to prefer TSMC/Samsung Foundry for now. Similarly, MediaTek, its main rival, appears to not be making a switch either.

    Future Prospects for Apple

    This leads us to the potential for future Apple A-series chips. Ming-Chi Kuo has previously mentioned that Intel Foundry will produce the Apple M7 using Intel’s 14A node, so it isn’t far-fetched to think that this partnership could also include iPhone chips. Intel’s 14A node is anticipated to start mass production around 2027, and Patrick states, “I am already hearing very positive things” about it.

    Technology and Competition

    Intel 14A is set to be among the initial nodes to utilize ASML’s high-NA EUV machines, which is expected to lead to higher prices. Besides Apple, Nvidia might also employ 14A for some of its products. If an earlier report holds true, Intel’s competitor AMD could also be a potential customer. In addition to 14A, Intel’s advanced packaging technologies, including EMIB and Foveros, are catching the attention of major industry players.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • Intel 14A Node Cost Higher Than 18A Due to High-NA EUV

    Intel 14A Node Cost Higher Than 18A Due to High-NA EUV

    Key Takeaways

    1. The new 14A node from Intel will be more expensive than the existing 18A node due to advanced High-NA EUV lithography tools costing around $380 million.
    2. The 14A node is expected to improve performance-per-watt by 15-20% and reduce power consumption by 25-35%, featuring new technologies like RibbonFET 2 transistors and Turbo Cells.
    3. Intel’s success with the 14A node relies on attracting external foundry clients; insufficient interest could lead to a slowdown or halt in development.
    4. Intel plans to maintain its partnership with TSMC, with 70% of production in-house and 30% outsourced, and TSMC will manufacture key chip series for Intel.
    5. Intel has secured significant investments, totaling over $7 billion, and anticipates critical developments in 2026 related to the 14A node.

    Intel CFO David Zinsner has recently stated that the new 14A node from Intel will be pricier than the existing 18A node. The increased costs stem from the next-gen High-NA EUV lithography tools, which are priced at around $380 million, in contrast to the $235 million tools currently in use. Importantly, the 14A node is Intel’s first fabrication process tailored specifically for both internal and external foundry clients.

    Performance and Efficiency Boost

    The 14A node is anticipated to deliver roughly 15 to 20 percent improved performance-per-watt when compared to the existing 18A node, along with a power consumption reduction of 25 to 35 percent. This new node incorporates RibbonFET 2 transistors, PowerDirect backside power delivery, and Turbo Cells. Furthermore, the new High-NA EUV tool boasts a much finer resolution of 8nm in a single exposure, a significant improvement over the 13.5nm resolution of the current tools.

    Dependency on External Customers

    Intel must attract external foundry clients to validate the development expenses of the 14A node. If the foundry fails to secure a sufficient number of external customers, the company might need to slow down or possibly halt the node’s development. Nevertheless, CEO Lip-Bu Tan has expressed growing confidence due to enhancements in 18A yield. Additionally, due to US government contract stipulations (which require 51 percent control), Intel Foundry cannot be separated off.

    Ongoing Partnership with TSMC

    On another note, Intel’s CFO claims that the company will likely continue its partnership with TSMC indefinitely. Currently, production is split with 70 percent in-house and 30 percent outsourced to external foundries. It is reported that TSMC is responsible for manufacturing the entire Lunar Lake series and most Arrow Lake chips. Furthermore, Intel is expected to be one of TSMC’s initial clients for 2nm chips, with TSMC set to produce the upcoming Nova Lake chips.

    Recently, Intel has attracted substantial investments, including $2 billion from SoftBank and $5.7 billion from government funding. Additional funding is also anticipated from Mobileye ($1 billion) and Altera ($3.5 billion). Panther Lake on 18A is expected to commence production later this year, with 2026 seen as a crucial year for assessing the progress of the 14A node.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • Apple and Nvidia Eye Intel’s 14A Node as Potential Clients

    Apple and Nvidia Eye Intel’s 14A Node as Potential Clients

    Key Takeaways

    1. Samsung Foundry struggles with stable yields for SF2, leading companies to prefer TSMC for advanced chip production.
    2. Apple and Nvidia are considering Intel’s 14A node for future products, with mass production expected in 2028.
    3. TSMC continues to meet Apple’s current chip needs, with upcoming products transitioning between N3P and N2 nodes.
    4. Nvidia plans to use a custom TSMC 3 nm variant for its next-gen AI chips, while Intel’s 14A may be reserved for specific lower-end GPUs.
    5. TSMC and Intel are the main contenders for 1.4 nm production, as Samsung may withdraw from this competition, and Rapidus could emerge as a 2 nm alternative.

    With Samsung Foundry facing challenges in achieving stable yields for SF2, TSMC remains the primary choice for many companies needing advanced chips. However, rising wafer costs may push some firms to consider other options for their chip production. Major players like Apple and Nvidia are now eyeing a lesser-known contender in the semiconductor foundry scene: Intel.

    Potential Shift to Intel

    According to a recent research note from industry analysts, as reported by Reuters, Nvidia and Apple may shift to Intel’s 14A node for upcoming products. Intel’s timeline indicates that 14A is not expected to begin risk production until 2027, with mass production slated for 2028, assuming there are no additional delays. These speculations are not entirely fresh, as previous reports suggested Apple might utilize Intel’s 18A for certain chips.

    Apple and TSMC

    Currently, TSMC is fulfilling Apple’s immediate chip requirements, with the A19 and M5 series being produced on TSMC’s N3P node. In 2026, the A20 and M6 will move to N2, likely staying there for about a year alongside the A21/M7. However, it seems that only the Apple M8 could transition to 14A, while the A22 is expected to remain with TSMC.

    Nvidia’s Future Plans

    As for Nvidia, its upcoming Rubin architecture is projected to use a tailored TSMC 3 nm variant (probably 3N) for its AI chips and RTX 60 series desktop GPUs, anticipated to launch around 2027 if Nvidia’s plans hold. The successor to Rubin, the Feynman architecture, set for 2028, could potentially utilize Intel’s 14A. Yet, Nvidia isn’t entirely abandoning TSMC, as 14A will only be designated for certain ‘low-end’ GPUs.

    TSMC’s next-gen N2 successor, A14, is not expected to debut until 2028, making it premature to predict which original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) will adopt it. Samsung might withdraw from the 1.4 nm competition due to its renewed efforts to make SF2 more appealing to OEMs. This leaves TSMC and Intel as the two foundries capable of 1.4 nm production, although the Japanese company Rapidus may also present itself as a possible 2 nm alternative by that time.

    Source:
    Link

    Tags: , ,