Key Takeaways
1. The iPhone 16e features a less powerful GPU with a 4-core configuration compared to other iPhone 16 models.
2. Performance tests show the iPhone 16e has lower CPU scores than the standard iPhone 16, indicating about 10% weaker CPU performance.
3. The iPhone 16e scored 24,188 on the Metal test, while the iPhone 16 scored 28,042, highlighting a 15% efficiency gap in GPU performance.
4. The iPhone 16e is priced $200 lower than the standard iPhone 16, making it a more budget-friendly option.
5. Buyers may need to compromise on performance and features, such as the absence of an ultra-wide-angle camera, for the lower price.
Apple has just launched its latest mid-tier smartphone, the iPhone 16e, earlier this week. It’s clear that Apple is not trying to conceal the fact that the iPhone 16e comes with a less powerful GPU compared to other models in the iPhone 16 lineup, featuring a 4-core configuration. However, it seems that the new device might also fall short in terms of CPU performance.
Performance Details
Recently, the iPhone 16e was spotted on Geekbench under the model number “iPhone 17,5,” equipped with 8 GB of RAM. The results show a single-core score of 2,706 and a multi-core score of 7,942. For comparison, the standard iPhone 16 achieved scores of 3,377 and 8,362 in our tests. This data suggests that the iPhone 16’s CPU might be about 10% stronger than that of the iPhone 16e, which is intriguing since both devices share the same number of CPU cores and clock speed.
GPU Performance Comparison
The Metal test results from Geekbench highlight the impact of the missing GPU core in the A18 chip of the iPhone 16e. It scored 24,188 on the Metal test, while the vanilla iPhone 16 managed a score of 28,042. This indicates that the absence of one core likely allows the iPhone 16 to be approximately 15% more efficient in GPU performance.
Pricing and Trade-offs
Although it is somewhat disheartening that the iPhone 16e does not match the performance levels of the iPhone 16, there is a silver lining: the new device is priced $200 lower. For prospective buyers, the slightly diminished performance and the absence of an ultra-wide-angle camera might be seen as a reasonable compromise.
Don’t forget to check out the Apple Watch Ultra 2 available on Amazon.
Source:
Link
Leave a Reply