Tag: Geekbench 6

  • Apple M5 Max Beats Ryzen AI Max+ by 25% in Geekbench 6

    Apple M5 Max Beats Ryzen AI Max+ by 25% in Geekbench 6

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Apple M5 Max scored 29,233 in multi-core and 4,260 in single-core tests on Geekbench 6, outperforming its predecessor, the M4 Max.
    2. The M5 Max shows a 9% increase in single-core performance and a 14% increase in multi-core performance compared to the M4 Max.
    3. The M5 Max is the fastest CPU Apple has produced, surpassing the top-tier M3 Ultra by 5.4%.
    4. The M5 Max outperforms Intel and AMD competitors, exceeding the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX by 34% and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 25% in multi-core tests.
    5. While benchmarks are useful, real-world performance may vary; however, the M5 Max is expected to be one of the fastest options available for consumers.

    The initial benchmarks for the Apple M5 Max have emerged, and the results are impressively high, as expected from a premium Apple Silicon system on a chip.

    Benchmark Scores

    The leaked Geekbench 6 results reveal that the 18-core Apple M5 Max achieved an impressive score of 29,233 points in multi-core testing and about 4,260 points in single-core tests. For comparison, the standard M5 MacBook Pro, which is currently priced at $1,440 on Amazon, scores similarly in single-core tests while scoring approximately 17,100 in multi-core tests.

    Performance Improvements

    When evaluating its predecessor, the M4 Max, the M5 Max shows an increase of about 9% in single-core performance. In contrast, for multi-core performance, this new chip is around 14% quicker. Notably, this makes the M5 Max the fastest CPU Apple has ever produced, boasting a lead of 5.4% over the top-tier M3 Ultra.

    Competing Chips

    In comparison to AMD and Intel offerings in the x86 sector, there simply isn’t a consumer CPU that matches the M5 Max in Geekbench 6. The M5 Max outperforms the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX by roughly 34% in multi-core tests, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 “Strix Halo” lags behind by about 25%.

    Even chips designed for desktops can’t keep up with the Apple M5 Max in Geekbench 6. The M5 Max surpasses both the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X by around 23%. In a rather amusing twist, the 64-core Threadripper 9980X is also left behind, though by a smaller margin of 6.6%.

    Real-World Applications

    It’s important to note that a single benchmark doesn’t fully reflect real-world performance in professional tasks. However, it’s clear that Apple’s new silicon lineup is likely to be among the fastest options available for consumers.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra CPU and GPU Benchmark Test Results

    Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra CPU and GPU Benchmark Test Results

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Galaxy S26 Ultra will launch alongside the Galaxy S26 and S26+ on Wednesday.
    2. It achieved a Geekbench 6 single-core score of 3,648 and a multi-core score of 10,898, which are average compared to similar devices.
    3. The device has a notable CPU score of 1,094,797 on AnTuTu, making it the second most powerful device on their performance leaderboard.
    4. Its GPU performance shows mixed results, scoring 6,489 in the 3DMark Wildlife Extreme test, lower than other Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 devices.
    5. However, it excels in GPU performance on AnTuTu with a score of 1,447,696, outperforming all other Android devices.

    As mentioned earlier, Samsung’s upcoming Galaxy S26 Ultra has been extensively reviewed in a hands-on preview. This top-tier smartphone is expected to launch on Wednesday, along with the Galaxy S26 and S26+, and it has also undergone benchmarking to evaluate its performance capabilities.

    Performance Scores

    According to Sahil Karoul, the Galaxy S26 Ultra achieves a single-core score of 3,648 on Geekbench 6, and its multi-core score is 10,898. These figures are quite average when compared to other devices powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset that we have evaluated, which may leave some users feeling let down. Notably, the Galaxy S26 Ultra is equipped with a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 variant that features prime cores clocking in at up to 4.74 GHz, compared to the standard version’s 4.61 GHz.

    Benchmarking Highlights

    In contrast, when it comes to AnTuTu, the Galaxy S26 Ultra shines with a CPU score of 1,094,797, ranking it as the second most powerful device on AnTuTu’s performance leaderboard, just behind the actively cooled RedMagic 11 Pro, which scores 1,193,279.

    Graphics Performance

    The flagship device produces mixed results in GPU benchmarks. During the 3DMark Wildlife Extreme test, it secures a peak loop score of 6,489, which is not as good as many other Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 devices we’ve analyzed. However, its GPU score of 1,447,696 on AnTuTu stands out as remarkable, exceeding the performance of any other Android device on the platform’s chart.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Gaming CPU Scores Low on Geekbench 6

    Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Gaming CPU Scores Low on Geekbench 6

    Key Takeaways

    1. Intel is launching the Core Ultra 200K Plus gaming CPUs, including the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, but not the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus.

    2. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus features 18 cores (12 efficiency and 6 performance), with 4 additional E-cores compared to the previous 245K model.

    3. Performance improvements include a 100 MHz boost for P-cores and E-cores, while the E-core base clock decreases by 100 MHz; it may support DDR5-7200.

    4. In Geekbench 6 tests, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scored 3,113 points in single-core performance, a slight improvement over the 245K, but only 15,251 points in multi-core performance, lower than expected.

    5. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has specifications of 6 MB L2 cache, 30 MB L3 cache, a base clock of 4.2 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.3 GHz, using the LGA 1851 socket.

    Intel is set to launch its Core Ultra 200K Plus gaming CPUs very soon. The lineup has been confirmed to include the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. As mentioned previously, the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus will not be released.

    New Benchmarking Insights

    Previously, we had only seen leaked performance tests for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus. Recently, it seems the more budget-friendly 250K Plus has made an appearance on Geekbench 6. According to the listing, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus features a configuration of 18 cores, which includes 12 efficiency cores and 6 performance cores. This new chip adds 4 E-cores compared to its older sibling, the 245K.

    Performance Expectations

    There are likely to be improved clock speeds as well; the P-cores and E-cores will see an increase of 100 MHz (boost), while the E-core base clock will decrease by 100 MHz. It’s also been suggested that the CPU might support DDR5-7200. This testing was conducted on an Asus Prime Z890-P motherboard, with the CPU coupled with 32 GB of DDR5 RAM (Crucial Pro kit currently priced at $366.26 on Amazon).

    In single-core performance, the Intel Core Ultra 250K Plus achieved a notable score of 3,113 points. To put this in perspective, the previous 245K usually scores around 3,000 points in the same benchmark, which shows a slight improvement. However, in multi-core performance, the situation isn’t as promising—the 250K only managed to reach approximately 15,251 points, significantly lower than the expected 18,000 points from its predecessor.

    Changes Still Possible

    Being an initial benchmark, these scores can definitely change over time. Given that the 250K Plus has more physical cores and higher boost clocks for the P-cores, it’s puzzling why it is falling behind its predecessor.

    Additional specifications for the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus indicated by the benchmark include 6 MB of L2 cache, 30 MB of L3 cache, a base clock of 4.2 GHz, and a maximum boost clock of 5.3 GHz. Expectedly, the CPU will still use the LGA 1851 socket.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Leaks: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Beats A19 Pro

    Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Leaks: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Beats A19 Pro

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Galaxy S26 Ultra features the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset, with Geekbench scores of 3,601 (single-core) and 10,686 (multi-core).
    2. The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 is approximately 16% faster in single-core and 7.5% faster in multi-core tests compared to its predecessor.
    3. In direct comparison, Apple’s A19 Pro is about 7% faster in single-core tests, while the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 is 6% faster in multi-core tests.
    4. The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 is slightly overclocked, reaching a boost frequency of 4.74 GHz, which is higher than the official max of 4.60 GHz.
    5. Samsung continues to use the “For Galaxy” version of its Snapdragon chipsets, following the trend set with the Galaxy S23 series.

    The Samsung Galaxy S26 series is on the horizon, and that means we are seeing more leaks about the Galaxy S26, especially the Ultra version, which is the most awaited model. We have previously revealed many details regarding its design, display, colors, and camera specs. Now, we have some Geekbench scores to discuss.

    Geekbench Performance Results

    The recent Geekbench scores for the Galaxy S26 Ultra show that the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset achieved a score of 3,601 for single-core and 10,686 for multi-core tests. The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 is said to be combined with 12 GB of VRAM, operating at a base clock speed of 3.63 GHz and a peak clock speed of 4.74 GHz on two cores.

    Speed Comparison

    Our evaluation indicates that the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in the Galaxy S26 Ultra is approximately 16% quicker in single-core and 7.5% faster in multi-core Geekbench 6 tests compared to its predecessor. When we pit the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 against Apple’s A19 Pro, it turns out that the A19 Pro is about 7% faster in single-core testing, while the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 edges ahead by 6% in the multi-core tests.

    Overclocked Snapdragons

    The new Geekbench listing for the Galaxy S26 Ultra appears to verify that Samsung will continue its trend of using a slightly overclocked Snapdragon SoC. The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 has a max boost clock officially set at 4.60 GHz, but in this case, it boasts a reported boost frequency of 4.74 GHz, achieving a 3% advantage.

    Samsung has been following this approach since the introduction of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy in the Galaxy S23 series. Consequently, it looks like the Galaxy S26 series will also include the “For Galaxy” version of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • New OneXPlayer X1 Launches with Intel Panther Lake and 32GB RAM

    New OneXPlayer X1 Launches with Intel Panther Lake and 32GB RAM

    Key Takeaways

    1. New gaming handhelds are being developed using Intel’s Panther Lake processors, with the Arc B380 as the intended integrated GPU (iGPU).
    2. One-Netbook is working on the OneXPlayer X1, which will use the Core Ultra 5 338H processor and the Arc B370 iGPU.
    3. The Arc B370 iGPU is rumored to feature 10 Xe3 cores and a boost clock of 2.4 GHz, with a configuration of 4 Performance and 8 Efficient clusters.
    4. Early Geekbench tests show that the Panther Lake-based OneXPlayer X1 hasn’t yet outperformed previous models in single-core or multi-core benchmarks.
    5. The OneXPlayer X1 is expected to launch around CES 2026, with specifications like a TDP of 65-80 W and an option for 32 GB of RAM.

    Almost a month ago, there were rumors about new gaming handhelds being developed with Intel’s Panther Lake processors. To summarize, VideoCardz shared that the Arc B380, featuring 12 Xe3 cores, was the intended integrated GPU (iGPU). Earlier leaks suggested that the possible processors could be the Core Ultra X7 356H or the Core Ultra X7 358H, but VideoCardz thought that this might be a different processor specifically for handheld devices.

    New Developments in Panther Lake Handhelds

    Recent findings on Geekbench indicate that not all Panther Lake handhelds are following the earlier speculation. It looks like One-Netbook is in the process of creating its next OneXPlayer X1, which will use the regular Core Ultra 5 338H along with an Arc B370 iGPU. This iGPU is said to have 12 cores split into 4 Performance and 8 Efficient clusters, while the Arc B370 is rumored to have 10 Xe3 cores and a boost clock of 2.4 GHz.

    Previous Models and Performance Expectations

    For context, One-Netbook has previously launched OneXPlayer X1 series handhelds equipped with Intel’s Lunar Lake and Meteor Lake processors, in addition to AMD’s Hawk Point and Strix Point models (currently priced at $1,399 on Amazon). Up to now, the new Panther Lake-based OneXPlayer X1 hasn’t surpassed any of its earlier versions in Geekbench 6’s single-core or multi-core tests. Nevertheless, we are skeptical that this reflects the final performance, and it is unclear what wattage was used during these tests.

    Key Specifications and Future Release

    Putting the scores aside, the Core Ultra 5 338H is expected to have a thermal design power (TDP) of 65-80 W and can boost up to 4.7 GHz. Additionally, Geekbench notes that the upcoming OneXPlayer X1 will include 32 GB of RAM as a potential memory option. It’s likely that the first Panther Lake gaming handhelds will be officially revealed next month, during or just after CES 2026, which takes place from January 6 to January 9 in Las Vegas. Sadly, other specifics about the next OneXPlayer X1 are still not available at this time.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite: Speed Comparison Test

    Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite: Speed Comparison Test

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 uses Samsung’s Exynos 2500 chipset, differing from the Qualcomm chipset in the Galaxy Fold 7, particularly in the European market.
    2. The Exynos 2500 features a deca-core design with a mix of high-performance and efficiency cores, built on a 3nm GAA manufacturing process.
    3. Graphics performance is powered by the Xclipse 950, which supports AMD’s RDNA 3.5 technology and ray tracing capabilities.
    4. The Exynos 2500’s CPU performance lags behind Qualcomm’s leading chipsets, scoring 2478 points in single-core and 8098 points in multi-core benchmarks.
    5. The Neural Processing Unit (NPU) performance shows a significant gap, with the Galaxy Z Flip 7 underperforming by up to 32% compared to competitors like the Xiaomi model with Snapdragon 8 Elite.

    In comparison to the larger Samsung Galaxy Fold 7, the compact Galaxy Z Flip 7 (which you can find on Amazon) runs on Samsung’s Exynos 2500. This is different from the latest high-end Qualcomm chipset, at least for the European market.

    Specifications of Exynos 2500

    The Samsung Exynos 2500 marks the debut of Samsung’s innovative 3nm GAA manufacturing process. This system-on-chip (SoC) includes a total of 10 cores. It features a deca-core configuration with a 3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 prime core, two Cortex-A725 cores at 2.75 GHz each, five power-efficient Cortex-A725 cores running at 2.36 GHz, and two efficiency cores based on Cortex-A520, clocked at 1.8 GHz.

    Graphics Performance

    For graphics, the Exynos 2500 is equipped with the Xclipse 950, operating at 1.3 GHz and utilizing AMD’s RDNA 3.5 technology, which supports ray tracing.

    The CPU capabilities of the Exynos 2500 in the Galaxy Z Flip 7 fall short when compared to Qualcomm’s top-tier chipset. The Samsung processor records 2478 points for single core performance and 8098 points for multi-core performance in Geekbench 6. This indicates that the Samsung SoC is approximately 8 to 20 percent behind the performance of the Galaxy Fold 7 and Xiaomi Mix Flip 2.

    NPU and AI Performance

    As the performance of Neural Processing Units (NPU) is increasingly crucial for smartphones, it’s worth examining the AI results from Geekbench. When comparing the Galaxy Flip 7 to the Xiaomi model powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite, the performance disparity is even more pronounced, reaching up to 32 percent.

    Further benchmark evaluations will be available soon in our in-depth review of the Galaxy Z Flip 7.

    Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite: Speed Comparison TestSamsung Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite: Speed Comparison Test

     

    Tags: , ,
  • Exynos 2500 Benchmarks Show Disappointing Performance for Galaxy Z Flip7

    Exynos 2500 Benchmarks Show Disappointing Performance for Galaxy Z Flip7

    Key Takeaways

    1. Samsung launched the Galaxy Z Flip7 alongside the Galaxy Z Fold7 and Galaxy Z Flip7 FE.
    2. The Galaxy Z Flip7 uses the Exynos 2500 chipset, which underperforms compared to newer flagship chipsets.
    3. Geekbench 6 scores show the Exynos 2500 has a single-core score of 2,093 and a multi-core score of 7,498.
    4. Performance of the Exynos 2500 is comparable to older chipsets, falling behind MediaTek and Qualcomm competitors.
    5. The Exynos 2500’s GPU, Xclipse 950, is expected to compete better against Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Adreno 830.

    Samsung introduced the Galaxy Z Flip just a week ago, along with the Galaxy Z Fold7 and Galaxy Z Flip7 FE. In contrast to its larger counterpart, the Galaxy Z Flip7 is equipped with Samsung’s own Exynos 2500, which seems to hinder its performance.

    Performance Insights

    According to Fenibook on X, the Exynos 2500 falls behind when stacked against the latest flagship chipsets in terms of CPU capabilities. The chipset in the Galaxy Z Flip7 records a single-core score of 2,093 and a multi-core score of 7,498 on Geekbench 6.

    These scores match those listed before the phone’s launch, indicating that the performance is aligned with older chipsets. For instance, the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 achieved scores of 2,207 and 7,408 during our tests on the Vivo X100 Pro. Similarly, the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro, which features the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, delivered a single-core score of 2,318 and a multi-core score of 7,357.

    Competitive Comparison

    It’s clear that the Exynos 2500 does not provide performance that can compete with rivals like Apple, Qualcomm, and MediaTek, at least in terms of CPU. However, the chipset’s Xclipse 950 GPU is anticipated to be more competitive with the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Adreno 830.

    Source:
    Link

    Exynos 2500 Benchmarks Show Disappointing Performance for Galaxy Z Flip7
    Tags: , ,
  • A19 Pro Performance Leak for iPhone 17 Series Revealed

    A19 Pro Performance Leak for iPhone 17 Series Revealed

    Key Takeaways

    1. Apple will unveil the iPhone 17 series, including the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, in September.
    2. The new A19 Pro chipset may offer a 15-20% performance improvement over the A18 Pro.
    3. Expected Geekbench scores for the A19 Pro are around 4,000 (single-core) and 10,000 (multi-core).
    4. The A19 Pro will be manufactured using TSMC’s N3P node.
    5. Other chipsets debuting in September include the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 and MediaTek Dimensity 9500.

    Apple is set to unveil the iPhone 17 series this coming September. Among the new models, the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max are anticipated to come equipped with the A19 Pro chipset. Recently, a leak has emerged that sheds light on the potential performance of this new chipset.

    Performance Insights

    According to Digital Chat Station on Weibo, the A19 Pro chipset may not represent a significant leap from its predecessor, the A18 Pro. Current estimates suggest that the A19 Pro could achieve around 4,000 in Geekbench 6’s single-core test and approximately 10,000 in the multi-core test.

    While these figures might not be completely precise, they do hint at the A19 Pro’s expected capabilities. For comparison, the A18 Pro found in the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max usually scores about 3,500 and 8,900 on Geekbench’s single-core and multi-core tests, respectively. This indicates a performance improvement of around 15-20% for the A19 Pro, which is a solid gain but not particularly groundbreaking.

    Manufacturing Process

    The A19 Pro is likely to be manufactured using TSMC’s N3P node, similar to the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 and MediaTek Dimensity 9500. Interestingly, all three of these chipsets are also expected to make their debut in September.

    Source:
    Link

    Tags: , ,
  • Xiaomi 15S Pro Outperforms iPhone 16 Pro Max in Multi-Core Speed

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Outperforms iPhone 16 Pro Max in Multi-Core Speed

    Key Takeaways

    1. Xiaomi officially launched the Xring O1, featured in the Xiaomi 15S Pro and Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra, claiming impressive performance figures over 3 million on Antutu.
    2. Performance tests show the Xring O1 scored 2,766 in Single-Core and 8,843 in Multi-Core on Geekbench 6, which is lower than the Snapdragon 8 Elite.
    3. The Xring O1 outperforms the Apple A18 Pro in Multi-Core tests by 7% but is 18% slower in Single-Core tests.
    4. The Xring O1 is Xiaomi’s first in-house System on Chip (SoC), with potential implications for the company’s future reliance on MediaTek and Qualcomm.
    5. The Xiaomi 15S Pro is not yet available in global markets, limiting extensive reviews from Western outlets.

    After making a big impression with its remarkable performance leaks, Xiaomi has officially launched the Xring O1 last week, included in the Xiaomi 15S Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra. The company boasts some significant performance figures for the Xring O1, claiming it can achieve over 3 million on Antutu. However, we can’t completely trust these first-party statistics for obvious reasons.

    Testing the Performance

    Fortunately, Max Weinbach tested the Xiaomi 15S Pro equipped with the Xring O1 using Geekbench 6 and compared the results against the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max. This comparison gives us a clearer view of what the Xiaomi Xring O1 can do.

    The performance results indicate that the Xring O1 in the Xiaomi 15S Pro scored 2,766 in Single-Core and 8,843 in Multi-Core tests on Geekbench 6. According to our records, these scores fall short of the Snapdragon 8 Elite, which averages about 9% and 4% faster than the Xring O1 in Single-Core and Multi-Core benchmarks, respectively.

    A Favorable Comparison

    When comparing it to the Apple A18 Pro, the Xring O1 performs better. The side-by-side Geekbench 6 results from Max Weinbach show that the Xiaomi 15S Pro is actually 7% quicker in the Multi-Core test. This is not surprising since the Xring O1 has a 10-core CPU, while the A18 Pro has only 6 cores. However, in the Single-Core test, the Xring O1 is 18% slower than the A18 Pro.

    All things considered, this is a strong performance for Xiaomi, as the Xring O1 marks the company’s first in-house System on Chip (SoC). If the chip also delivers on efficiency, as Xiaomi claims, it could lead to the company completely moving away from MediaTek and Qualcomm SoCs in their high-end products.

    Availability Issues

    Unfortunately, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is not yet accessible in global markets, which means extensive reviews from various Western outlets are unlikely to surface anytime soon. We are eager to test the Xring O1 thoroughly as soon as we can get our hands on the Xiaomi 15S Pro or the Pad 7 Ultra.

    Source:
    Link

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Outperforms iPhone 16 Pro Max in Multi-Core Speed
    Tags: , ,
  • Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Surpasses Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra on Geekbench

    Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Surpasses Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra on Geekbench

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra will be unveiled in China on May 22, alongside the Xiaomi 15S Pro and other gadgets.
    2. It scored 2,715 in single-core and 8,849 in multi-core on Geekbench 6, showing solid performance for a tablet.
    3. The tablet’s main cores operate at 3.70 GHz, resulting in approximately 15% lower performance compared to the Xiaomi 15S Pro.
    4. It outperforms older models like the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, despite having a less powerful chipset.
    5. Key features include 16 GB of RAM, a 14-inch OLED display, and a large 12,000 mAh battery for extended use.

    Xiaomi is set to unveil the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra in China on May 22, along with the Xiaomi 15S Pro and other exciting new gadgets. Before the official launch, the flagship tablet has already made an appearance on Geekbench, showcasing some notable performance results.

    Performance Metrics

    The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra, identified by the model number “25032RP42C,” achieved a single-core score of 2,715 and a multi-core score of 8,849 on Geekbench 6. Although these figures are not as high as those from its sibling, the Xiaomi 15S Pro powered by XRing O1, this is mainly due to the tested version of the tablet running a slower variant of the Xiaomi chipset.

    Core Specifications

    In terms of core specifications, the two main cores in the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra operate at 3.70 GHz, compared to 3.90 GHz found in the 15S Pro. Additionally, the four-core cluster is clocked at 3.04 GHz, which is lower than the 3.40 GHz frequency in the smartphone. This results in approximately a 15% reduction in performance when compared to the Xiaomi 15S Pro.

    Competitive Edge

    Nevertheless, even with a less powerful chipset, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra still shows impressive capabilities. It may not compete with tablets powered by Snapdragon 8 Elite, but it significantly outperforms older models like the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (available on Amazon). That particular tablet, which comes with a MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, achieved scores of 2,192 and 7,327 on Geekbench 6 during our evaluations.

    In addition to its robust chipset, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra is equipped with 16 GB of RAM. It also boasts a 14-inch OLED display and a massive 12,000 mAh battery, ensuring long-lasting performance.

    Source:
    Link

    Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Surpasses Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra on Geekbench

     

    Tags: , ,