Tag: Arrow Lake

  • Intel Nova Lake CPUs: Up to 16 P-Cores & 32 E-Cores Rumored

    Intel Nova Lake CPUs: Up to 16 P-Cores & 32 E-Cores Rumored

    The new Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200 desktop CPUs have yet to persuade gamers to upgrade from the older i9-14900K models. The latest architecture fails to show any meaningful performance improvements, despite several months of software updates. It appears Arrow Lake is merely setting the stage for future innovations, particularly Nova Lake, which is anticipated in 2026.

    Speculation on Nova Lake’s Architecture

    Intel has not revealed any specifications for Nova Lake in their recent quarterly earnings report. However, co-CEO Michelle Johnston Holthaus let slip that “Nova Lake will actually have die both inside and outside for that process. So you’ll actually see compute tiles inside and outside.” This revelation sparked a flurry of speculation on Reddit about potential core counts for the upcoming generation of chips.

    Core Configurations and Variants

    According to a now-deleted post by Exist50 on Reddit, the premium Nova Lake desktop CPUs might include up to 2×8 Coyote Cove P-cores and 2×16 Arctic Wolf E-cores, aligning with the concept of dual compute tiles mentioned by Intel’s co-CEO. Additionally, Exist50 mentioned that there will be high-performance mobile Nova Lake variants with configurations of 8P + 16E cores, as well as mid-range desktop and mobile options featuring just 4P + 8E cores. There will also be ultra-low-voltage (ULV) versions that only have 4 P-cores without any E-cores.

    Future iGPU Tile and Production Nodes

    The specifics of the iGPU tile for Nova Lake remain ambiguous. However, it is confirmed that these chips will be manufactured using Intel’s 18A nodes, similar to the Panther Lake mobile processors set to launch in late 2025.

    Source:
    Link

  • Core Ultra 5 225H vs Ryzen AI 9 365: Geekbench 6 Results Leaked

    Core Ultra 5 225H vs Ryzen AI 9 365: Geekbench 6 Results Leaked

    With the recent introduction of the desktop Arrow Lake CPUs, Intel is now set to reveal its mobile Arrow Lake-H CPUs. This lineup is said to include five different SKUs, starting with the Core Ultra 5 225H at the lower end and the Core Ultra 9 285H at the high end. After the Core Ultra 9 285H was spotted on Geekbench, the entry-level Core Ultra 5 225H has also surfaced on Geekbench 6.

    Geekbench Scores and Sample Status

    It’s worth noting that while the Geekbench 6 results are legitimate, the Core Ultra 5 225H has not yet been officially released, suggesting that what we are seeing could be a non-retail sample.

    The Core Ultra 5 225H scored 2,592 in single-core and 12,550 in multi-core benchmarks on Geekbench 6. The processor appears to operate at a base clock of 1.7 GHz and a boost clock nearing 4.88 GHz. Although there are slight variances, these clock speeds align with the expected base and boost frequencies for the Core Ultra 5 225H.

    Performance Comparisons

    According to the Geekbench 6 scores, the Core Ultra 5 225H is approximately 15.3% faster in multi-core tasks and 4% slower in single-core performance compared to the Core Ultra 7 258V. This outcome is anticipated since the Lunar Lake chip has a TDP of 17 W, while the Core Ultra 5 225H is expected to have a TDP of 28 W.

    A more fitting comparison is with the Core Ultra 5 125H, as the Meteor Lake chip occupies a similar position and also has a 28 W base TDP. In this case, the Core Ultra 5 225H seems to outperform by 10% in multi-core benchmarks and 14% in single-core tests.

    Rivalry with Strix Point and Potential

    Lastly, the Strix Point Ryzen AI 9 365, which has a base TDP of 28 W, shows an 8% and 7% lead in single-core and multi-core Geekbench 6 scores, respectively. It will be intriguing to see whether the retail versions of the Core Ultra 5 225H can close this performance gap.

    While the leaked Geekbench 6 performance of the Core Ultra 5 225H isn’t groundbreaking compared to the newest mobile CPUs, the reported specifications indicate it’s an entry-level SKU aimed at lightweight laptops rather than a powerhouse.

    Specifications Overview

    In terms of specs, the Core Ultra 5 225H is said to feature 4 Lion Cove P-cores, 8 Skymont E-cores, and 2 Crestmont LP E-cores. The Lion Cove P-cores are anticipated to have a base/boost clock speed of 1.6/5.0 GHz, while the Crestmont E-cores might run slower at 1.3/4.3 GHz. Furthermore, the chip could include 28 MB of L3 cache.

    On the iGPU front, the Core Ultra 5 225H is rumored to be equipped with an “Alchemist+” Xe-LPG+ Arc 130T iGPU featuring 7 Xe cores. It remains uncertain what level of performance this new iGPU will achieve.

    Source: Link


    Core Ultra 5 225H vs Ryzen AI 9 365: Geekbench 6 Results Leaked
  • Intel’s Arrow Lake Launch Issues: Promises Performance Fixes

    Intel’s Arrow Lake Launch Issues: Promises Performance Fixes

    Robert Hallock, who is the vice president and general manager at Intel, recently discussed the new Arrow Lake desktop series. During a podcast interview with Hot Hardware, Hallock acknowledged that the launch did not meet expectations. As highlighted in our review of the Core Ultra 9 285K, although the new lineup shows improvements in efficiency, it falls short compared to rivals in gaming performance.

    Performance Issues

    Specifically, we observed that the leading Intel Arrow Lake desktop chip does not perform as well as the Core i9 14900K from the Raptor Lake Refresh, which is currently priced at $438.41 on Amazon. Hallock mentioned that this level of performance was not anticipated by Intel, but he assured listeners that the company aims to “make it right.”

    Looking Ahead

    In addition, Hallock stated that the Arrow Lake processors have a “solid foundation,” and Intel has identified the reasons behind the “wild unintended effects.” He was candid about the performance challenges, clarifying that these issues are not due to Microsoft or any external factors.

    Future Updates

    On a positive note, Hallock indicated that Intel intends to provide a “comprehensive update” that will detail the issues and their causes by the end of November or early December. The company will also share its plans for addressing the performance shortcomings of the lineup.

  • Intel Arrow Lake Leak Reveals Software Issues and Slow Gaming Performance

    Intel Arrow Lake Leak Reveals Software Issues and Slow Gaming Performance

    We are nearing the release of reviews for the Core Ultra 200S “Arrow Lake” series. It’s no surprise that this is the ideal moment for leaks about these new CPUs to emerge. Recently, Moore’s Law Is Dead has disclosed some concerning details regarding the Arrow Lake processors.

    Caution Advised

    Before diving deeper, it’s important to advise readers to treat this information carefully and refrain from jumping to conclusions until the official reviews are out.

    According to MLID, based on conversations with various reviewers, game developers, and YouTubers, the Arrow Lake processors do not enhance gaming performance. In fact, the Core Ultra 9 285K is reported to underperform compared to the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, the Core i9-14900K, and the Ryzen 9 9950X. Alarmingly, one review indicated that even the previous generation, the Core i9-13900K, outperformed the Arrow Lake flagship.

    Performance Comparison

    The Core Ultra 7 265K also apparently fell short "in one set of averages" against the Ryzen 7 7700X (Available on Amazon). This is particularly concerning as the Ryzen 7 7700X directly competes with the Core i5-13600K, not the Core i7.

    In terms of non-gaming tasks, the Core Ultra 9 285K appears to match the performance of the Ryzen 9 9950X (Available on Amazon).

    However, gaming performance isn’t the only significant issue with the Arrow Lake CPUs. MLID asserts that almost everyone he’s spoken to has reported a myriad of problems. These issues range from erratic performance across various review datasets to persistent Blue Screen of Death errors, and even players being ejected from servers due to mistaken identification of cheating software while using the Core Ultra 9 285K.

    Hardware vs Software Issues

    The Arrow Lake situation is reportedly so problematic that several reviewers are questioning whether there might be a hardware flaw. Nonetheless, the leaker has received assurance from an Intel source that Arrow Lake does not have a hardware defect; instead, the troubles stem from poor software.

    In conclusion, Arrow Lake appears to be a generation focused solely on efficiency and slight productivity enhancements, but not much else. When comparing Intel’s offerings against Zen 5, the Core Ultra 200S chips reportedly lack a performance edge. With the Ryzen 7 9800X3D on the way, it looks like Intel enthusiasts may have to wait until next year’s Panther Lake for desktops to see a notable improvement in gaming performance to match Zen 5 X3D.

    Given the reported challenges, the Core Ultra 200 processors may face a difficult reception when reviews are published.

    Moore’s Law Is Dead on YouTube.

  • Intel Arc 140T Graphics Offers 60% Performance Boost Over Lunar Lake

    Intel Arc 140T Graphics Offers 60% Performance Boost Over Lunar Lake

    A new Intel Arc graphics chip has surfaced on GFXBench, demonstrating notable performance improvements compared to its Lunar Lake version. This GPU, known as the Arc 140T, delivered frame rates that exceed those of the current Arc 140V integrated graphics by over 60 percent.

    Benchmark Results

    According to benchmark results shared by Michael (@miktdt) on X, the Arc 140T achieved a score of 11,056 frames at 178.3 FPS in GFXBench’s OpenGL test. In contrast, the Arc 140V models with 16GB and 8GB of memory only managed 110.3 FPS (6,839 frames) and 106.7 FPS (6,613 frames), respectively.

    Performance Differences

    Despite both the 140T and 140V featuring the same eight Xe Cores, there is a clear performance gap—likely stemming from differences in design or implementation. Based on the specifications and naming conventions, it appears that the 140T is more geared towards integrated graphics rather than functioning as a standalone GPU.

    Future Prospects

    It’s possible that the 140T is designed for Intel’s forthcoming Arrow Lake-H/HX mobile chips. This aligns with Intel’s approach: Arrow Lake is centered on boosting performance, while Lunar Lake emphasizes energy efficiency. The variation in performance between the two could be linked to the types of transistors used, with the 140T probably utilizing higher-performance transistors compared to the power-efficiency-oriented ones in the 140V from Lunar Lake.

    If everything proceeds as expected, the Arc 140T could debut in Arrow Lake mobile chips around early 2025. As of now, Intel has not officially verified these specifications or performance figures.