Tag: Geekbench 6

  • Xiaomi 15S Pro Outperforms iPhone 16 Pro Max in Multi-Core Speed

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Outperforms iPhone 16 Pro Max in Multi-Core Speed

    Key Takeaways

    1. Xiaomi officially launched the Xring O1, featured in the Xiaomi 15S Pro and Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra, claiming impressive performance figures over 3 million on Antutu.
    2. Performance tests show the Xring O1 scored 2,766 in Single-Core and 8,843 in Multi-Core on Geekbench 6, which is lower than the Snapdragon 8 Elite.
    3. The Xring O1 outperforms the Apple A18 Pro in Multi-Core tests by 7% but is 18% slower in Single-Core tests.
    4. The Xring O1 is Xiaomi’s first in-house System on Chip (SoC), with potential implications for the company’s future reliance on MediaTek and Qualcomm.
    5. The Xiaomi 15S Pro is not yet available in global markets, limiting extensive reviews from Western outlets.

    After making a big impression with its remarkable performance leaks, Xiaomi has officially launched the Xring O1 last week, included in the Xiaomi 15S Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra. The company boasts some significant performance figures for the Xring O1, claiming it can achieve over 3 million on Antutu. However, we can’t completely trust these first-party statistics for obvious reasons.

    Testing the Performance

    Fortunately, Max Weinbach tested the Xiaomi 15S Pro equipped with the Xring O1 using Geekbench 6 and compared the results against the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max. This comparison gives us a clearer view of what the Xiaomi Xring O1 can do.

    The performance results indicate that the Xring O1 in the Xiaomi 15S Pro scored 2,766 in Single-Core and 8,843 in Multi-Core tests on Geekbench 6. According to our records, these scores fall short of the Snapdragon 8 Elite, which averages about 9% and 4% faster than the Xring O1 in Single-Core and Multi-Core benchmarks, respectively.

    A Favorable Comparison

    When comparing it to the Apple A18 Pro, the Xring O1 performs better. The side-by-side Geekbench 6 results from Max Weinbach show that the Xiaomi 15S Pro is actually 7% quicker in the Multi-Core test. This is not surprising since the Xring O1 has a 10-core CPU, while the A18 Pro has only 6 cores. However, in the Single-Core test, the Xring O1 is 18% slower than the A18 Pro.

    All things considered, this is a strong performance for Xiaomi, as the Xring O1 marks the company’s first in-house System on Chip (SoC). If the chip also delivers on efficiency, as Xiaomi claims, it could lead to the company completely moving away from MediaTek and Qualcomm SoCs in their high-end products.

    Availability Issues

    Unfortunately, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is not yet accessible in global markets, which means extensive reviews from various Western outlets are unlikely to surface anytime soon. We are eager to test the Xring O1 thoroughly as soon as we can get our hands on the Xiaomi 15S Pro or the Pad 7 Ultra.

    Source:
    Link

    Xiaomi 15S Pro Outperforms iPhone 16 Pro Max in Multi-Core Speed
    Tags: , ,
  • Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Surpasses Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra on Geekbench

    Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Surpasses Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra on Geekbench

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra will be unveiled in China on May 22, alongside the Xiaomi 15S Pro and other gadgets.
    2. It scored 2,715 in single-core and 8,849 in multi-core on Geekbench 6, showing solid performance for a tablet.
    3. The tablet’s main cores operate at 3.70 GHz, resulting in approximately 15% lower performance compared to the Xiaomi 15S Pro.
    4. It outperforms older models like the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, despite having a less powerful chipset.
    5. Key features include 16 GB of RAM, a 14-inch OLED display, and a large 12,000 mAh battery for extended use.

    Xiaomi is set to unveil the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra in China on May 22, along with the Xiaomi 15S Pro and other exciting new gadgets. Before the official launch, the flagship tablet has already made an appearance on Geekbench, showcasing some notable performance results.

    Performance Metrics

    The Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra, identified by the model number “25032RP42C,” achieved a single-core score of 2,715 and a multi-core score of 8,849 on Geekbench 6. Although these figures are not as high as those from its sibling, the Xiaomi 15S Pro powered by XRing O1, this is mainly due to the tested version of the tablet running a slower variant of the Xiaomi chipset.

    Core Specifications

    In terms of core specifications, the two main cores in the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra operate at 3.70 GHz, compared to 3.90 GHz found in the 15S Pro. Additionally, the four-core cluster is clocked at 3.04 GHz, which is lower than the 3.40 GHz frequency in the smartphone. This results in approximately a 15% reduction in performance when compared to the Xiaomi 15S Pro.

    Competitive Edge

    Nevertheless, even with a less powerful chipset, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra still shows impressive capabilities. It may not compete with tablets powered by Snapdragon 8 Elite, but it significantly outperforms older models like the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (available on Amazon). That particular tablet, which comes with a MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, achieved scores of 2,192 and 7,327 on Geekbench 6 during our evaluations.

    In addition to its robust chipset, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra is equipped with 16 GB of RAM. It also boasts a 14-inch OLED display and a massive 12,000 mAh battery, ensuring long-lasting performance.

    Source:
    Link

    Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Surpasses Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra on Geekbench

     

    Tags: , ,
  • Snapdragon 8s Gen 4: Redmi Turbo 4 Pro Performance Benchmarks

    Snapdragon 8s Gen 4: Redmi Turbo 4 Pro Performance Benchmarks

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 was recently introduced and is featured in the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro as its first smartphone application.
    2. The Redmi Turbo 4 Pro achieved notable benchmark scores: 2,165 (single-core) and 7,005 (multi-core) on Geekbench 6, and 2,216,228 on AnTuTu.
    3. Compared to Qualcomm’s QRD device, the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro shows slightly lower performance, which is expected due to the QRD being optimized for peak performance.
    4. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 in the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro generally lags behind many Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 devices, except in the multi-core Geekbench 6 test.
    5. In real-world usage, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 competes well with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in demanding games.

    Qualcomm introduced the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 about four weeks ago. Although the benchmarks from the chipset in the QRD device have given us a glimpse of its capabilities, the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro stands out as the first smartphone equipped with this new SoC and has been put to the test prior to its official launch.

    Performance Scores

    According to Xiaobai’s Tech Reviews, the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro achieved a single-core score of 2,165 on Geekbench 6 and a multi-core score of 7,005. In AnTuTu, the smartphone scored an impressive 2,216,228. For graphics performance, the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro secured a score of 4,619 on 3DMark’s WildLife Extreme test.

    Comparison with QRD Device

    When compared to Qualcomm’s QRD engineering device, the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro shows slightly lower performance. This is expected, as the QRD device often represents the peak performance scenario. As a result, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 in the Redmi Turbo 4 lags behind many Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 devices we’ve assessed, with the exception of the multi-core test on Geekbench 6.

    Real-World Usage

    Nonetheless, practical performance is another story entirely, and the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 is capable of competing with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in numerous demanding games.

    Source:
    Link

    Snapdragon 8s Gen 4: Redmi Turbo 4 Pro Performance BenchmarksSnapdragon 8s Gen 4: Redmi Turbo 4 Pro Performance BenchmarksSnapdragon 8s Gen 4: Redmi Turbo 4 Pro Performance BenchmarksSnapdragon 8s Gen 4: Redmi Turbo 4 Pro Performance Benchmarks
    Tags: , ,
  • Snapdragon X SoC Takes on AMD Ryzen 7 8840U in Geekbench 6

    Snapdragon X SoC Takes on AMD Ryzen 7 8840U in Geekbench 6

    At CES 2025, Qualcomm revealed a fresh addition to its desktop-class Snapdragon series, named the Snapdragon X. This was the only new system on chip (SoC) that debuted at the event, featuring eight powerful Oryon cores running at a speed of 3.0 GHz, accompanied by a 45 TOPS neural processing unit (NPU). Clearly, this chip is aimed mainly at the entry-level laptop market.

    Performance Insights

    Recent updates have offered us clearer insights into the performance of this new desktop ARM SoC, thanks to Rolan Quandt, who successfully conducted a Geekbench 6 test using a laptop during the event. The Snapdragon X, integrated into a 16-inch Asus Vivobook, showed respectable multi-core performance. However, it’s important to note that the single-core performance isn’t as impressive as one would hope.

    Before we look into the specifics, it’s essential to mention that these laptops are still in the quality control phase, meaning there could be potential for enhanced performance. For single-core performance, the 8-core Snapdragon X scored approximately 2,121 points. In contrast, the multi-core score is more appealing, sitting around 10,492 points. This multi-core performance aligns it closely with the higher-tier Ryzen 7 8840U “Hawk Point” processor, though the Snapdragon X falls short in single-core performance.

    Pricing and Expectations

    Ultimately, the affordability of the laptops powered by Snapdragon X is a significant factor. Qualcomm aims to target the $600 price range, although it’s possible that well-equipped models may cost more. One may anticipate that Qualcomm will excel in terms of power efficiency and battery longevity, but its 1.7 teraflops Adreno iGPU pales in comparison to the older entry-level Radeon 740M iGPU that has been on the market for some time now.

    For individuals who value battery life and can manage their tasks on an ARM-based platform, the Snapdragon X appears quite compelling, as long as iGPU performance isn’t a top priority. However, this holds true only if the upcoming devices are reasonably priced.

    Source:
    Link

    Image 1
    Tags: , ,
  • Core Ultra 5 225H vs Ryzen AI 9 365: Geekbench 6 Results Leaked

    Core Ultra 5 225H vs Ryzen AI 9 365: Geekbench 6 Results Leaked

    With the recent introduction of the desktop Arrow Lake CPUs, Intel is now set to reveal its mobile Arrow Lake-H CPUs. This lineup is said to include five different SKUs, starting with the Core Ultra 5 225H at the lower end and the Core Ultra 9 285H at the high end. After the Core Ultra 9 285H was spotted on Geekbench, the entry-level Core Ultra 5 225H has also surfaced on Geekbench 6.

    Geekbench Scores and Sample Status

    It’s worth noting that while the Geekbench 6 results are legitimate, the Core Ultra 5 225H has not yet been officially released, suggesting that what we are seeing could be a non-retail sample.

    The Core Ultra 5 225H scored 2,592 in single-core and 12,550 in multi-core benchmarks on Geekbench 6. The processor appears to operate at a base clock of 1.7 GHz and a boost clock nearing 4.88 GHz. Although there are slight variances, these clock speeds align with the expected base and boost frequencies for the Core Ultra 5 225H.

    Performance Comparisons

    According to the Geekbench 6 scores, the Core Ultra 5 225H is approximately 15.3% faster in multi-core tasks and 4% slower in single-core performance compared to the Core Ultra 7 258V. This outcome is anticipated since the Lunar Lake chip has a TDP of 17 W, while the Core Ultra 5 225H is expected to have a TDP of 28 W.

    A more fitting comparison is with the Core Ultra 5 125H, as the Meteor Lake chip occupies a similar position and also has a 28 W base TDP. In this case, the Core Ultra 5 225H seems to outperform by 10% in multi-core benchmarks and 14% in single-core tests.

    Rivalry with Strix Point and Potential

    Lastly, the Strix Point Ryzen AI 9 365, which has a base TDP of 28 W, shows an 8% and 7% lead in single-core and multi-core Geekbench 6 scores, respectively. It will be intriguing to see whether the retail versions of the Core Ultra 5 225H can close this performance gap.

    While the leaked Geekbench 6 performance of the Core Ultra 5 225H isn’t groundbreaking compared to the newest mobile CPUs, the reported specifications indicate it’s an entry-level SKU aimed at lightweight laptops rather than a powerhouse.

    Specifications Overview

    In terms of specs, the Core Ultra 5 225H is said to feature 4 Lion Cove P-cores, 8 Skymont E-cores, and 2 Crestmont LP E-cores. The Lion Cove P-cores are anticipated to have a base/boost clock speed of 1.6/5.0 GHz, while the Crestmont E-cores might run slower at 1.3/4.3 GHz. Furthermore, the chip could include 28 MB of L3 cache.

    On the iGPU front, the Core Ultra 5 225H is rumored to be equipped with an “Alchemist+” Xe-LPG+ Arc 130T iGPU featuring 7 Xe cores. It remains uncertain what level of performance this new iGPU will achieve.

    Source: Link

    Core Ultra 5 225H vs Ryzen AI 9 365: Geekbench 6 Results Leaked
    Tags: , ,
  • Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 vs Dimensity 9500: 25% Performance Boost

    Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 vs Dimensity 9500: 25% Performance Boost

    The dust hasn’t even settled on Qualcomm’s latest flagship chip, the Snapdragon 8 Elite, and already there are rumors about its successor. The Snapdragon 8 Elite provides a significant performance boost compared to its predecessor, largely due to the transition to Oryon cores. Recently, a leak has emerged suggesting that Qualcomm might be looking to raise the bar even further with the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2.

    Performance Expectations

    As per leaker Jukanlosreve, who references sources from Korea, both the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 and MediaTek’s forthcoming Dimensity 9500 could achieve single-core scores nearing 4,000 on Geekbench 6. To put things in perspective, the current Snapdragon 8 Elite scores around 3,200 on the same benchmark. If this leak is accurate, the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 could see a performance improvement of 25%—a notable upgrade, especially considering the already exceptional performance of the 8 Elite.

    Thermal Management Challenges

    Yet, Qualcomm has a track record of balancing high performance with thermal management, and the 8 Elite is no different. While it excels in speed, it also tends to generate more heat than earlier models due to its clock speed of 4.32 GHz. Thus, an important question for the 8 Elite 2 is how Qualcomm plans to handle these expected performance increases while keeping temperatures in check.

    Manufacturing Insights

    Previous rumors indicated that the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 might be produced by both TSMC and Samsung. However, another leak from Jukanlosreve asserts that TSMC will take on the role of the exclusive manufacturer for Qualcomm’s upcoming flagship SoC. The N3P process from TSMC is rumored to deliver enhanced performance and improved power efficiency compared to the N3 node utilized in the 8 Elite. Whether these enhancements will address the thermal challenges that typically come with a performance boost remains to be seen.

    It’s still quite early, and these are merely rumors for now. Given that the current generation is still recent in the market, it will likely be a while before we see more definitive information. We will keep you posted as new updates come to light.

    Tags: , ,
  • Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 Leak: 20% CPU Boost for Galaxy S26 Chipset

    Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 Leak: 20% CPU Boost for Galaxy S26 Chipset

    The Snapdragon 8 Elite appears to be a fantastic improvement over the previous Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, with Qualcomm shifting from standard ARM cores to Oryon, leading to a 30% boost in CPU performance. Although it’s still early in the game, a recent leak has given us a glimpse of what the upcoming Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 might bring.

    Performance Expectations

    According to leaker Jukanlosreve, along with information from Korean sources, both the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 and MediaTek’s Dimensity 9400 are projected to achieve single-core scores around 4000 on Geekbench 6. For context, the Snapdragon 8 Elite usually scores near 3200 on this benchmark, suggesting a possible 25% performance increase for its next iteration.

    Thermal Management Concerns

    It remains uncertain how Qualcomm will maintain acceptable temperatures while enhancing performance. Despite the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s impressive peak capabilities, it has not been highly regarded for its thermal management, as the chipset operates at higher temperatures than its predecessor due to a significant 4.32 GHz clock speed.

    Manufacturing Insights

    Interestingly, the leak indicates that the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 will not be produced solely by TSMC. Qualcomm plans to collaborate with both TSMC and Samsung, with the chip being manufactured on the SF2 and N3P nodes. However, it’s wise to approach this information with some skepticism.

    Tags: , ,
  • Xiaomi 15 Leak Suggests Upcoming Global Launch with Errors

    Xiaomi 15 Leak Suggests Upcoming Global Launch with Errors

    The Xiaomi 15’s Chinese variant made quite an impression recently on Geekbench 6 before its official release. Now, it seems that the international version has taken a different route by focusing on the benchmark’s AI performance tests ahead of time.

    Speculation on Snapdragon 8 Elite

    This device is believed to be the world’s smallest smartphone powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, as indicated by its model number: 24129PN74G. The "G" at the end suggests that it could be a global version, derived from the original model number 24129PN74C.

    Chipset Differences

    However, if this is indeed the Xiaomi 15, the global variant appears to have a distinct chipset in the Geekbench AI tests. It features a 6-core setup running at 2.78GHz and 2 additional cores at 4.09GHz, differing from the familiar 6 cores at 3.53GHz and 2 cores at 4.32GHz introduced at Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon Summit.

    Benchmark Scores

    Assuming it is the Xiaomi 15, the benchmark scores so far are fairly impressive, with results ranging from 3,045 to 4,254. These scores are generally superior and more consistent compared to those of the Xiaomi 14 (model number 23127PN0CG) in the same benchmarks.

    In conclusion, this leak could very well indicate that Xiaomi is on the verge of introducing the world’s first compact smartphone equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Elite and running Android 15.

    Image 1
    Tags: , ,