Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Tops DxOMark Display but Has Issues

Key Takeaways

1. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra achieved a top score of 160 points in display evaluation by DxOMark, outperforming the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, which scored 158 points.
2. The display features an anti-reflective coating that reflects only 1.5% of surrounding light, significantly reducing reflections compared to competitors like the iPhone 16 Pro Max.
3. The display maintains a brightness level of 2,122 nits in direct sunlight, similar to the iPhone 16 Pro Max, while improved contrast ratios enhance visibility in bright conditions.
4. Color accuracy has improved over the Galaxy S24 Ultra, with better color representation and less impact from viewing angles, though HDR brightness has decreased in dark environments.
5. Critiques include excessive brightness in low-light situations and occasional unintentional touches on the touchscreen, along with slower responsiveness compared to other smartphones in its class.


DxOMark has recently conducted a thorough evaluation of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra’s display. Scoring an impressive 160 points, it secures the top spot, leaving the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL in second place with 158 points. This high rating can be attributed to the anti-reflective coating on the Corning Gorilla Armor 2 glass, which reportedly reflects just 1.5% of surrounding light, significantly less than the iPhone 16 Pro Max or Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, which reflects more than three times that amount.

Brightness & Contrast

The brightness level remains unchanged from the Galaxy S24 Ultra, with the display still capable of reaching 2,122 nits in direct sunlight, making it nearly equivalent to the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max. However, the reduced reflection levels lead to increased contrast ratios in bright conditions, which enhances the overall display quality. DxOMark recorded a PWM frequency of 480 Hz, which should not pose issues for most users.

Color Accuracy Improvements

In comparison to the Galaxy S24 Ultra, the Galaxy S25 Ultra shows notable improvements in color accuracy, offering more precise color representation. Additionally, the display is less affected by viewing angles, maintaining consistent color fidelity. However, peak HDR brightness has seen a decline from 80 nits down to just 24 nits in dark environments, reducing the screen’s glare at night.

Critiques of the Display

Nonetheless, the DxOMark analysis is not without its faults. While there are advancements in HDR content display, the screen remains excessively bright in low-light situations. Furthermore, the touchscreen, similar to its predecessor, still experiences occasional unintentional touches and does not respond as swiftly as other smartphones in the same category.

Source:
Link


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *