Key Takeaways
1. The Galaxy S25 Ultra received a DxOMark score of 146, ranking it 24th in camera performance, just two points higher than its predecessor.
2. It scored lower than competitors like the Google Pixel 8 (148), Apple iPhone 16 (147), and Huawei P60 Pro (156), with Huawei Pura 70 Ultra leading at 163.
3. The camera system shows versatility, capturing detailed images at long zoom, natural skin tones in good lighting, and vibrant videos with good dynamic range.
4. Issues include overexposed highlights even with HDR on, unnatural skin tones in low light, and significant noise in dim lighting videos.
5. The portrait mode and video autofocus/exposure adjustments can be inconsistent, leading to minor issues that affect overall performance compared to competing smartphones.
DxOMark has recently evaluated the quad-camera system on the Galaxy S25 Ultra, which is priced at about $1,219 on Amazon, giving it a score of 146. This score places the latest Samsung flagship only two points higher than its predecessor. The result is not particularly impressive for a current-generation flagship, especially since the Galaxy S25 Ultra is ranked 24th in DxOMark’s camera score list, sharing this position with the Apple iPhone 14 Pro.
Comparisons with Competitors
Interestingly, the S25 Ultra scored lower than several older or more affordable rivals, including the Google Pixel 8 at 148 points, the Apple iPhone 16 at 147 points, and the Huawei P60 Pro at 156 points. The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra leads the pack with an impressive 163 points. However, during our review, the camera system of the Galaxy S25 Ultra showed versatility, impressing us with the details it captured even at longer zoom distances, as well as its natural skin tones in easier lighting conditions and videos that featured vibrant colors and a good dynamic range.
Room for Improvement
Despite its strengths, the Galaxy S25 Ultra has more issues than one might expect from a top-tier device. For instance, highlights can sometimes be overexposed, even when HDR is turned on, and skin tones may appear unnatural in low-light settings. Additionally, videos shot in dim lighting often display a significant amount of noise.
The portrait mode, which mimics bokeh effects, doesn’t always engage properly. When shooting videos, both exposure adjustments and autofocus can be shaky at times. The analysis indicates that while the Galaxy S25 Ultra’s camera does not have any glaring shortcomings, it does possess several minor issues that accumulate, allowing some competing smartphones to outperform it in terms of still and video quality under certain circumstances.
Source:
Link
Leave a Reply