Key Takeaways
1. The Framework Desktop features a mobile Zen 5 Ryzen AI Max+ 395 CPU and integrated Radeon 8060S GPU, setting it apart from typical mini-ITX PCs that use desktop processors.
2. It has lower power consumption, averaging about 144 W under load, compared to the GMK EVO-X2’s 186 W, while maintaining similar performance levels.
3. The Framework Desktop operates in Balanced mode, showcasing efficient performance without high power usage.
4. The larger size of the Framework results in quieter fans and lower core temperatures compared to the GMK model.
5. The Framework Desktop is considered more adaptable and offers better value unless compact design is a top priority for the user.
Aside from emphasizing repairability and serviceability, the Framework Desktop stands out due to its mobile Zen 5 Ryzen AI Max+ 395 CPU and the integrated Radeon 8060S GPU. In contrast, many other mini-ITX PCs typically utilize “true” desktop processors instead. This same CPU is also present in smaller mini PCs such as the GMK EVO-X2, but the Framework Desktop operates with significantly lower power consumption than one might anticipate.
Power Consumption Comparison
Our comparison graphs indicate that the Framework system uses an average of about 144 W while running Prime95, whereas the GMK model consumes around 186 W, all while delivering nearly identical performance levels. Similar trends can be seen when testing GPU performance with Cyberpunk 2077. Notably, the Framework system is functioning in Balanced mode during these tests.
Noise and Temperature Levels
It’s not surprising that the greater size and more efficient power requirements of the Framework lead to noticeably quieter fans and lower core temperatures compared to the GMK. Unless you highly value the compact design of the GMK model, the Framework, which is similarly priced yet more adaptable, might be the superior choice.
Leave a Reply