Category: EV vehicles

  • Older Teslas with FSD HW3: Ready for Robotaxi Service

    Older Teslas with FSD HW3: Ready for Robotaxi Service

    According to Lars Moravy, who is the chief engineer at Tesla, even older models like the 2018 Model 3 will be able to experience the autonomous features of the new Robotaxi.

    Robotaxi Specs and Features

    The recently revealed Robotaxi, which seats two, will utilize Tesla’s FSD software powered by the forthcoming AI5, or Hardware 5.0, featuring advanced 3nm computers, cameras, and sensors. This will enable the vehicle to navigate to its destination without needing a steering wheel or pedals.

    Participation in Cybercab Service

    Moreover, all other Tesla models, including the Cybertruck, will also participate in the Cybercab ride-share service. Tesla plans to offer this platform for a fee, allowing owners to rent their vehicles to the Cybercab fleet for any duration they choose, whenever they want.

    Interestingly, it appears that even Tesla cars equipped with the older HW3 can also serve as Robotaxis, contrary to what some might expect. Lars Moravy confirmed this during a casual interview at the "We, Robot" event, stating that any HW3 Tesla is ready to operate as a Robotaxi.

    Upcoming FSD Updates

    In Tesla’s latest roadmap for September and October, there was one unexpected item: the FSD 13 release. Since the FSD 12.5 versions are just now being rolled out to HW3 vehicles, it will be intriguing to see what Tesla has planned with such a significant version jump.

    It’s possible that the FSD 13 update will introduce the Cybercab service framework for the Robotaxi as well as the other vehicles in its fleet. Tesla will need to present this software to regulators if it wishes to obtain permission for unsupervised FSD operations in Texas and California next year, as hinted by Elon Musk.

    Regardless, those with HW3 will certainly be able to utilize FSD 13 too, but it remains unclear if there will be any differences in performance, similar to how FSD 12.5 operates on either Hardware 4.0 or 3.0 systems.

    Lars Moravy (Tesla) via Kim Java (YT)

  • Cybertruck Warranty Excludes Off-Roading and Sunlight Damage

    Cybertruck Warranty Excludes Off-Roading and Sunlight Damage

    There has been a lot of negative feedback regarding the Cybertruck, from canceled insurance plans to recalls, and many feel that buying this vehicle is a questionable choice. Nonetheless, Tesla has remained firm in claiming that the Cybertruck is just as capable, if not more, than its electric vehicle and traditional rivals. Curiously, this confidence appears to be only skin deep, as a screenshot posted on Reddit highlights a long list of warranty restrictions.

    Warranty Limitations Uncovered

    A Reddit user named turingagentzero recently shared a post with the title "CyberTruck warranty is voided by off-roading (or hitting potholes)." After checking Tesla’s site, it’s evident that the screenshot is indeed from the official warranty document for the Cybertruck. Ironically, the phrase "driving off-road" even gets its own bullet point, even though the Cybertruck is mostly shown driving off-road in the promotional video on Tesla’s website. It’s understandable that driving off-road can lead to uncertainty and might justify a warranty denial. However, Tesla seems to take it further by broadening the definition of off-road in the next bullet point, which disapproves of "Driving over uneven, rough, damaged or hazardous surfaces, including but not limited to, curbs, potholes, unfinished roads, debris, or other obstacles…". Users in the discussion noted some other peculiar points in the document, such as sunlight, environmental factors, insect droppings, and more.

    The Question of Capability

    To clarify, it’s not unusual for auto manufacturers to impose such restrictions in their warranties. The issue here seems to add to the Cybertruck’s mysterious traits and how it is viewed. Is the Cybertruck a rugged vehicle ready to face the apocalypse, or is it a fragile EV that should only be driven on smooth, newly paved roads during partly cloudy weather? Ultimately, it is for the driver to determine.

    turingagentzero on Reddit and Tesla

  • Elon Musk Highlights Test Driver Boredom Before Model Y FSD Launch

    Elon Musk Highlights Test Driver Boredom Before Model Y FSD Launch

    Tesla might soon submit the required paperwork to get regulatory approval for its Full Self-Driving (FSD) feature to be used without any driver oversight, meaning no warnings or restrictions for the driver.

    Future Plans for Tesla Vehicles

    Elon Musk believes that by next year, Tesla will get the go-ahead for unsupervised FSD, effectively transforming the Model 3 and Model Y into a type of robotaxi, along with the Cybertruck and its other models.

    Challenges with the Robotaxi

    The newly announced Robotaxi by Tesla won’t be able to operate by itself right away. This is because it won’t begin mass production until 2026 at the earliest. Additionally, it will be tougher for regulators to approve its use as a self-driving vehicle since it lacks a steering wheel or pedals.

    Musk pointed out that one of the hurdles to gaining regulatory approval for unsupervised FSD is the boredom of test drivers. To get the necessary permits, Tesla needs to clearly show regulators that it has collected a significant amount of miles driven without any interventions or accidents.

    Statistics and Driver Experience

    He emphasized that the system is improving so much that gathering those statistics is becoming a challenge. Tesla aims to have more vehicles equipped with FSD on the roads, and is currently providing APR financing deals to help meet that goal.

    When it gets to thousands of miles without needing an intervention, the requirement is 10,000 miles for just one intervention. The average driver typically covers about 10,000 miles in a year. In cities, the average speed is around 20 mph. Our professional test drivers often feel bored, honestly. They might say, "I drove all week and there was no intervention." The highlight for them is when they finally get an intervention!

    Geographic Limitations

    Elon did mention that unsupervised FSD will initially be limited to geofenced areas in Texas and California. This means regulators may only allow its use in specific regions and routes, resembling how Waymo’s self-driving cars function.

    He also noted that Tesla is prepared to expand unsupervised FSD to any US area that grants approval, as well as internationally. However, Europe and China are expected to approve the current supervised FSD next year, and the unsupervised version may take longer.

    Regulatory Hurdles Ahead

    Currently, FSD is classified as a Level 2 driver-assist system, so moving to Level 4 or 5 next year could be quite ambitious unless Tesla agrees to adhere to many of the regulatory constraints that other autonomous public transit systems already follow. In summary, if unsupervised FSD does roll out in 2025, it will likely have a limited scope.

  • Tesla Robovan: Self-Driving 20-Seat Vehicle Not for Sale

    Tesla Robovan: Self-Driving 20-Seat Vehicle Not for Sale

    Elon Musk introduced a new electric autonomous vehicle during Tesla’s “We, Robot” event in Los Angeles on Thursday night. This vehicle, named the Robovan, is a prototype that resembles a bus and is intended for carrying people and goods in densely populated areas.

    Capabilities and Design

    Musk stated that the Robovan can transport up to 20 passengers or cargo. It features a unique retro-futuristic design, similar to the Tesla Cybercab, which was also presented at the same event. The vehicle boasts a shiny silver metallic exterior with black accents and sleek lighting strips. To me, it looks like something Iron Man would drive if he needed a van.

    The vehicle includes sliding doors that open to show the inside, which has seating, standing room, and tinted windows—all without a steering wheel. Following the Cybercab, this is another fully autonomous offering from Tesla.

    Cost Efficiency

    While the Cybercab aims to reduce transportation costs to about 20 cents per mile, the Robovan is expected to lower that further, possibly to just 5-10 cents per mile. A video showcasing the Robovan demonstrates its futuristic appearance, but changes in design are likely by the time it hits the market. For example, its low ground clearance could pose challenges for urban roads.

    Musk’s Optimism

    However, Musk did not share many details about the van. Since it’s still a prototype, information about pricing, production plans, and a release date remains vague. One thing is certain: it won’t be an affordable vehicle.

    Musk did mention, “We’re going to make this.” But it’s wise to take that statement with caution, as Tesla has a history of failing to meet their own deadlines. Furthermore, since this is just a prototype, the final design and production timeline are still very uncertain.

    Even though the Robovan is certainly striking, it’s not an entirely new idea for an autonomous van. Similar concepts have come from companies like Zoox and Cruise, although on a smaller scale. Additionally, China’s WeRide has also introduced a comparable Robobus.


    Tesla Robovan: Self-Driving 20-Seat Vehicle Not for Sale
    Tesla Robovan: Self-Driving 20-Seat Vehicle Not for Sale
    Tesla Robovan: Self-Driving 20-Seat Vehicle Not for Sale
    Tesla Robovan: Self-Driving 20-Seat Vehicle Not for Sale
  • Tesla Launches $30,000 Robotaxi with No Steering Wheels or Pedals

    Tesla Launches $30,000 Robotaxi with No Steering Wheels or Pedals

    Tesla has finally unveiled its long-awaited robotaxi, previously known as "Cybercab" and "Robotaxi," at an event on Thursday night. The striking two-seater vehicle features a cutting-edge design, including butterfly doors and wireless charging capabilities. The most notable aspect, however, is that it completely lacks a steering wheel. This vehicle is intended for a future where passengers can sit back and allow the car to manage the driving. Despite this, questions linger about its self-driving abilities. Let’s dive into the specifics.

    Cybercab Makes an Impression

    To kick things off, the Cybercab is certainly a showstopper. It was presented with a gold finish and has a light bar that appears to hold matrix headlights, drawing parallels to the Cybertruck. Moreover, it’s not just the absence of a steering wheel that’s interesting; this model has no pedals or even a rear window. Instead, it depends entirely on cameras and sensors to provide a complete view of its environment. In a dramatic moment, Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, made a grand entrance on stage while seated inside the Cybercab.

    The Interior Experience

    Inside, the atmosphere resembles that of a lounge, and passengers can enjoy generous cargo space thanks to its large hatchback trunk. One of the standout features is the wireless induction charging. This vehicle is the first from Tesla to eliminate the traditional charging port. However, the event didn’t clarify important technical specifics, such as the battery capacity or charging speed. Inductive charging utilizes electromagnetic fields to transfer energy from a pad to the battery, allowing for a cable-free experience. Musk stated, “The robotaxi has no plug. It just goes over the inductive charger and charges. So, yeah, that’s kind of how it should be.”

    Questions About Autonomy

    Now, let’s tackle the main concern — the self-driving technology. Tesla has been claiming fully autonomous driving for several years now, but even models with the “Full Self-Driving (FSD)” package still require human oversight. This raises concerns about the Cybercab’s absence of driver controls. Musk insists that the Cybercab uses the latest Tesla AI5 computer and operates purely on camera systems. He also mentioned plans to enable unsupervised Full Self-Driving in specific areas next year for current models. However, this promise has been repeated for the last five years. Furthermore, data indicates that Tesla must significantly improve its disengagement rates (the instances when a human driver must take over) before unsupervised driving can be realized. Thus, skepticism about Musk’s assertions remains.

    Price and Future Outlook

    Regarding price and release, Musk indicated that production for the Cybercab would start “before 2027,” with an expected cost of under $30,000. However, we must remember that Tesla’s second-generation Roadster, first revealed in 2017, still hasn’t begun series production. Therefore, there’s no assurance that the Cybercab won’t encounter similar delays. The anticipation is high, but only time will reveal if Tesla and Musk can fulfill these commitments.


    Image 1
    Image 1
    Image 1
  • Volkswagen Tayron Launches in Europe with 200kW eHybrid SUV Options

    Volkswagen Tayron Launches in Europe with 200kW eHybrid SUV Options

    The Volkswagen Tayron utilizes the MQB evo platform similar to the Tiguan, but it boasts a longer wheelbase of about 4.8 meters, allowing it to offer seating for 5 to 7 passengers. The interior is designed to provide what is considered "best-in-class" comfort, featuring 3-zone air conditioning, ambient lighting with 10 color options, and custom ArtVelours Eco microfiber upholstery.

    Advanced Features and Options

    This latest premium SUV from Volkswagen showcases illuminated VW badges on both the front and rear. It includes standard features like adaptive cruise control, Lane Assist, Park Assist, and braking assistance responsive to pedestrians and cyclists. Optional features include IQ.LIGHT HD matrix headlights and App-Connect Wireless for Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, as well as the ChatGPT-based IDA voice assistant.

    Powertrain Choices and Specifications

    The Tayron has made its debut in the European market, offering a selection of eHybrid models with either 150 kilowatts (approximately 204 horsepower) or 200 kilowatts (272 HP) with front-wheel drive. Both models are equipped with 19.7 kWh batteries, capable of achieving over 100 km of range and can charge at rates of up to 11 kW or 50 kW via AC or DC, respectively.

    For those interested in diesel options, the top-tier 142 kW (193 HP) 4MOTION TDI variant can tow as much as 2,500 kilograms (2.5 tonnes) when equipped with a bracket and Trailer Assist.

    Current Availability

    Nonetheless, Volkswagen is holding back on releasing these diesel variants and has only made the mild hybrid eTSI, rated at 110 kW, available so far, with a starting price of €45,475 (about $49,800).


    Image 1
    Image 1
  • Fisker Leaves Orange County HQ Amid Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

    Fisker Leaves Orange County HQ Amid Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

    Fisker has surprisingly left its headquarters in Orange County, creating a chaotic situation that will require a significant sum of money to tidy up. Earlier this year, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as the growth of electric vehicle (EV) adoption in the U.S. continues to wane. Under Chapter 11, courts usually manage the restructuring of businesses and their debts, allowing a struggling company to bounce back.

    Unresolved Issues

    Sadly, this doesn’t seem to be happening with Fisker. In a filing dated October 4th with the US Bankruptcy Court in Delaware by Shamrock Properties II, LLC, it was noted that the company’s owners and employees have become unreachable after the premises were handed back to Shamrock on September 27 in a state of chaos. Hazardous waste, tipped-over desks, and leftover belongings are scattered throughout the old headquarters.

    Asset Sales and Ambiguities

    It appears that Heritage Global Partners acquired some of Fisker’s assets and informed Shamrock around September 12 of their purchase. The abrupt exit of Fisker’s owners and team from the property before September ended leaves a question about who is liable for the cleanup – is it Fisker or HGP? Shamrock has struggled to get in touch with either party for clarity on who will take care of the mess.

    Fisker’s Chapter 11 filing earlier this year was prompted by the declining enthusiasm for EVs among consumers, which has led to a slowdown in EV sales in the U.S. Initially, there was optimism that Fisker EV owners would still be able to obtain parts and repairs while the company reorganized. However, with the abandonment of the headquarters, it seems owners are left to handle any vehicle problems themselves. Those who find themselves with a malfunctioning Fisker might consider using a more affordable self-balancing Segway for transportation (like this one on Amazon).

    Case 24-11390-TMH US District of Delaware.


    Image 1
    Image 1
  • Geico Cites Cybertruck Repair Issues for Insurance Cancellations

    Geico Cites Cybertruck Repair Issues for Insurance Cancellations

    Geico has addressed the concerns raised by owners of the Cybertruck regarding denied insurance renewals. The company pointed to the vehicle’s weight and high repair costs as contributing factors, stating that "some customers may have received notices indicating that PPA insurance would not be renewed for this vehicle."

    Availability of Insurance

    Despite these issues, Geico continues to provide private passenger automobile (PPA) insurance for the Cybertruck. For those who do not meet the criteria for PPA, Geico suggests considering their commercial vehicle policies as an alternative.

    Geico offers coverage nationwide for the Tesla Cybertruck. Due to its gross weight and the challenges related to parts availability for repair shops, some customers may have received notifications about the non-renewal of PPA insurance for this specific vehicle. However, insurance policies for the Cybertruck have always been accessible through the commercial insurance division, and PPA is still available. Geico plans to contact any customers who might have gotten a non-renewal notice.

    Cost Implications

    While it may seem unusual to cite the Cybertruck’s gross weight, which ranges from 8,834 lb (4,007 kg) to 9,169 lb (4,159 kg), as a reason for insurance cancellation, the difficulties in repairs certainly make sense. Geico has pointed out the shortage of Cybertruck parts as a justification for denying policy renewals, and evidence from rental companies with electric vehicle fleets supports this perspective.

    Hertz recently held a major sale of its Model 3 fleet, not just because they purchased the vehicles at high prices but also because repairs were slow and their insurance costs were quite high. Research by Gartner indicates that by the time electric vehicle prices match those of gas-powered cars, repair costs and insurance rates are expected to soar.

    Future Trends

    By 2027, it’s anticipated that the average cost for a serious accident repair involving an EV body and battery will rise by 30%. Consequently, vehicles that experience collisions may be more likely to be written off entirely, as repairing them could exceed their remaining value. Additionally, higher repair costs may lead to increased insurance premiums or even result in insurance companies declining coverage for certain car models.

    The high costs of electric vehicle repairs are partly due to the limited availability of replacement parts and the extensive use of gigacasting in manufacturing, including for the Cybertruck. As Tesla’s chief engineer Lars Moravy explains, the front and rear gigacast sections of the Cybertruck act as crush cans with built-in crumple zones. If these sections are damaged in an accident to protect passengers, it leads to significant repair expenses for insurers.

    In the UK, insurers have either refused to cover the Model Y or imposed steep premiums due to the high costs associated with repairing its gigacast rear. In response, Tesla redesigned this component and provided it to repair shops at cost, along with tutorials for replacement, to ease the insurers’ concerns.

    Insurers’ Reactions

    Similar issues may be influencing Geico’s justification for the Cybertruck’s high repair costs in relation to insurance renewals. Other insurers in the US are also recognizing these trends; a prospective Progressive customer received a rejection letter for a new Cybertruck insurance policy after coming from Geico.

    Even when Geico does offer PPA insurance for the Cybertruck, the costs can be quite steep. One owner reported being quoted $3,185 for a six-month insurance term.

    MunroLive (YT), TorqueNews’


    Image 1
  • Tesla Sentry Mode Will No Longer Power Devices

    Tesla Sentry Mode Will No Longer Power Devices

    With the new software update version 2024.32.6, Tesla is introducing a feature called Light Pulsing for the Sentry Mode in the refreshed Model S and Model X.

    Gentle Warning System

    Light Pulsing works by gently blinking the headlights when it senses a potential threat, creating a warning effect by increasing and decreasing the brightness. While this addition is nice, it’s worth noting that other Tesla models have included Light Pulsing since last year, indicating that this might not be the most exciting feature in the latest update.

    Power Cutbacks in Sentry Mode

    Earlier this year, Tesla’s previous battery head hinted at the company’s efforts to significantly cut down power usage while the vehicle is in theft-prevention mode. A new feature seems to be addressing this concern for almost all models, except for the Cybertruck, by disabling outlet power. Now, the 12V outlets and USB ports in Tesla cars will not function when the vehicle is in Sentry Mode, also cutting off the devices connected to them.

    This affects a variety of devices, from portable fridges hooked to the 12V outlets to laptops or phones that were charging in the car. When the Tesla is in Sentry Mode, these items will no longer receive power, which can be quite inconvenient for those relying on a portable fridge to keep their drinks cold.

    A Trade-off for Security

    Tesla owners still have the option to use Camp Mode to power their devices, but this means the car remains unlocked, which is the opposite of the security that many drivers seek from Sentry Mode. It’s uncertain how effective this power-cutting measure will be in reducing battery drain during Sentry Mode, but reports indicate that Tesla Service teams are already hearing frustration from customers and are relaying this feedback to higher management for review.


    Image 1
  • Food Acids: The Future of Lithium-Ion EV Battery Power

    Food Acids: The Future of Lithium-Ion EV Battery Power

    A recent advancement in battery technology from the University of New South Wales (UNSW) aims to tackle two major challenges—energy storage and sustainability. A team of researchers, headed by Professor Neeraj Sharma, has created a lithium-ion battery prototype that swaps out conventional graphite electrodes for materials derived from food acids like tartaric and malic acid, which are often found in fruits and during winemaking.

    Eco-Friendly Innovations

    This innovative approach not only enhances energy storage capabilities but also offers a greener solution. The significance of using food acids lies in their availability from food waste, which minimizes reliance on harmful substances. By opting for a water-based method, the production process of these batteries becomes cleaner and more sustainable overall.

    A Shift in Battery Materials

    For a long time, lithium-ion batteries have been essential for energy storage. However, the traditional production methods—like using mined graphite—are expensive and damaging to the environment. By exploring options derived from food waste, the UNSW team is presenting a fascinating alternative. Just think about it—batteries could become more affordable and sustainable in the future, facilitating a smoother shift towards renewable energy worldwide.

    Future Prospects

    The research is still in progress, with aspirations to increase production capacity and enhance the technology for broader uses. This could enable applications beyond just lithium-ion batteries, including sodium-ion systems. Such developments may influence industries that increasingly depend on energy storage, like electric vehicles and large renewable energy initiatives.

    UNSW Newsroom.


    Image 1