Tag: Mastercard

Key Takeaways

1. The petition initiated by Zero Ryoko rapidly gained over 205,000 signatures due to support from Elon Musk and increased media attention.
2. Valve’s removal of adult games from Steam, citing payment processor rules, sparked outrage and led to similar censorship on Itch.io.
3. The petition criticizes Visa and Mastercard for their perceived hypocrisy and their influence on online content regulation, highlighting their role in deplatforming non-illegal content.
4. The petition includes demands against age-verification measures that raise privacy concerns by requiring government-issued IDs.
5. The involvement of activist groups, like Collective Shout, in pressuring payment processors has come under scrutiny, emphasizing the hidden forces that shape online expression.

The petition started by a user named Zero Ryoko has experienced remarkable growth in the last few days, jumping from 70,000 to more than 205,000 signatures in just 5 days. This surge was notably boosted on July 21 when Elon Musk shared a post about the campaign on X, drawing significant mainstream attention to the matter.

Valve’s Actions Spark Outrage

The situation flared up after Valve, which owns the Steam platform, decided to take down a number of adult games, claiming it was following the rules set by its payment processors. This trend has now spread to Itch.io, leading to censorship of NSFW games there too.

The petition takes direct aim at Visa and Mastercard, calling them out for “blatant hypocrisy” in their self-assumed roles as global censors. The petition reads, “Whole genres of books, games, films, and art are being demonetized or deplatformed — not because they’re illegal, but because they upset the personal values of executives or activist groups.” It points out that while these companies are quick to target fictional content, they are slow to respond to platforms where real illegal activities have been reported.

Key Demands from the Petition

The petitioner outlined four main demands:

While many of the initial games banned on Steam were not of high quality, supporters of the petition are worried about what might happen next. The games that were taken down were primarily those that were seen to promote or endorse sexual violence or manipulation.

This controversy has sparked a renewed discussion about the significant, but often hidden, influence that a few financial companies have on online expression. Consumer advocates have long claimed that Visa and Mastercard have a virtual monopoly over digital payments, which gives them the power to act as unofficial regulators.

Privacy Concerns and Age Verification

The petition has also been modified to include opposition to age-verification measures implemented by platforms like YouTube, raising privacy issues since these verifications necessitate government-issued IDs and photos.

The role of third-party activist groups has also gained media attention, as mentioned in our previous updates. A past report by Vice Media journalist Ana Valens underscored the influence of the Australian group Collective Shout in pressuring payment processors.

The success of this petition, which has gathered over 205,000 signatures, has certainly highlighted the often-invisible forces that dictate what content is permitted in the digital landscape. It remains uncertain whether the growing pressure will compel these self-appointed regulators to change their actions.

The effect of third-party activist groups has also come into focus in the media, as noted in our earlier update. A previous report from Vice Media journalist Ana Valens brought attention to the Australian group Collective Shout and its efforts to influence payment processors.

The petition’s achievement in rallying more than 205,000 supporters has undeniably spotlighted the hidden dynamics that control what content is accepted in the online space. Whether this pressure will lead these self-declared regulators to alter their behavior is still to be determined.

Source:
Link

Key Takeaways

1. Steam has updated its content policies, influenced by payment companies like Visa and Mastercard, to restrict certain adult content.
2. A “mini-purge” has occurred, removing controversial games such as “Incest Tales” and “Wolf on Rail” from the platform.
3. The definition of “adult only content” remains unclear, but more explicit and fetish-related themes are likely banned.
4. While some view the changes positively to tackle problematic titles, others criticize the increased control payment processors have over game accessibility.
5. Community reactions are mixed, with some unhappy about the influence of payment providers on Steam’s decisions, advocating for Valve to maintain authority over content.

Steam has made changes to its content policies and started to remove certain controversial games after receiving pressure from payment companies like Visa and Mastercard.

Updated Guidelines

Recently, Steam modified its onboarding section on the documentation homepage to add a new point in the Rules and Guidelines: “Content that may violate the rules and standards set forth by Steam’s payment processors and related card networks and banks, or internet network providers. In particular, certain kinds of adult only content.”

The Mini-Purge

As noted by TheGamer, this update led to a sort of mini-purge, according to the Steam Database, which saw the removal of various problematic titles like “Incest Tales,” “Wolf on Rail,” “Sex Village,” and “Slave of the Police Officer,” among others, from the store.

While the exact definition of “certain types of adult only content” remains vague, it appears that more explicit and fetish-related themes will no longer be permitted on the platform.

Pros and Cons

On one hand, this action can be seen positively, as Steam has had a long-standing issue with adult shovelware that needed addressing. On the flip side, this change grants payment processors increased control over what is allowed on the platform, effectively deciding which games are accessible to players.

Both Visa and Mastercard are no strangers to this kind of action. They have previously taken steps to limit adult content on sites like Pornhub and OnlyFans.

Collective Shout’s Initiative

Earlier this month, Collective Shout, a grassroots movement opposing the objectification of women in media, sent an open letter to payment processors, including PayPal, Visa, and Mastercard, accusing them of profiting from numerous problematic titles on Steam.

They called on payment processors to “show corporate social responsibility and immediately stop processing payments on Steam and Itch.io and any other platforms hosting similar games.”

Community feedback

The response from the community appears to be mixed on the Steam subreddit, with many expressing dissatisfaction that the platform made these changes due to pressure from payment providers rather than making a decision independently.

Others argued that it shouldn’t be the card companies determining how users spend their money, stating that the final authority should lie with Valve.

Source:
link