Police Departments Share Mixed Views on EVs as Patrol Cars

Police Departments Share Mixed Views on EVs as Patrol Cars

Over the past year, three police departments that switched to electric police vehicles have shared their mixed experiences with these purchases. While Teslas performed poorly in actual patrol situations, Fords showed better results. The insights gained from these departments can assist others in avoiding the purchase of EVs that are not ideal for police duties.

Specialized Vehicle Needs

Police cars are typically modified versions of SUVs and sedans provided by manufacturers, but some are just regular vehicles that have been adapted. These cars come with tough tires, high-capacity batteries, additional lights, enhanced cooling systems, stronger shocks, and robust engines, all aimed at helping officers chase down suspects in any conditions. They are also equipped with police terminals, cameras, barriers for rear seats, waterproof seating, gun mounts, and sometimes even bulletproof features, all of which add weight and limit the space inside for officers who carry body armor and gear, along with transporting suspects.

Challenges with Tesla Models

Two departments that incorporated Teslas encountered multiple issues when using them as patrol cars. The Ukiah Police Department, located in Northern California, reported that their Tesla Model 3s had notable downsides. One major problem was the small rear seats, which could only accommodate one prisoner. Additionally, the front seats were cramped, making it hard for officers to exit the vehicle comfortably. They also faced long charging times, which could lead to hours of waiting at charging stations during long prisoner transports. Each modified Tesla 3 ended up costing around $150,000.

The Menlo Park Police Department, situated a few hours south of Ukiah, noticed similar issues with their Tesla Model Ys. A key disadvantage was the inefficiency stemming from the vehicle's software. Officers reported that the Teslas would unexpectedly stop while pulling over cars, due to the advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) that could not be turned off. This posed challenges during chases. Additionally, the vehicle would automatically lock its doors when the officer with the key walked away, wasting critical time if they needed to return quickly. The touch controls also required multiple taps to turn off lights, which hindered stealthy operations.

Ford’s Different Experience

The Fort Bragg Police Department, located an hour north of Ukiah, opted for the Ford F-150 Lightning EV. They faced issues primarily due to the officers' unfamiliarity with EV charging. This led to a situation where officers were late to an event because they chose a slow Level 1 charging station instead of looking for faster Level 2 or higher options. A 600-mile test using quicker charging stations still required 1.5 hours of wait time for battery recharges.

Another drawback involved limited range in hilly areas. A couple of trips to the local jail, which is 55 miles away, utilized 80% of the battery. The range of EVs can also decrease significantly in cold weather. Lastly, the department faced challenges finding transformers necessary for installing fast chargers at their station. They reported that the required transformer is delayed by a year due to supply chain problems, forcing them to rely on Level 1 charging.

Police departments need to think carefully about whether the charging infrastructure, range, or features of pricier EVs fit their requirements, especially when considering additional armor. Aspiring officers wanting to catch criminals can prepare for their police exam by looking for study guides on platforms like Amazon.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top