MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5: Benchmark Showdown

Key Takeaways

1. Qualcomm and MediaTek launched new chipsets: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and Dimensity 9500.
2. Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 outperformed Dimensity 9500 in Geekbench 6, with scores of 3,831 (single-core) and 12,459 (multi-core) versus 3,635 and 10,941, respectively.
3. In graphics performance, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 scored 8,492 on the 3DMark WildLife Extreme test, while Dimensity 9500 scored 8,251.
4. Both chipsets had similar results on GFXBench’s 1440P Aztec test, with Snapdragon at 157 FPS and Dimensity at 155 FPS.
5. Overall, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 shows superior performance over Dimensity 9500 in both CPU and GPU tests during evaluations on reference design devices.

Qualcomm and MediaTek recently unveiled their top-tier chipsets for this generation, the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and Dimensity 9500, just last week. Although only the Qualcomm chipset is currently available in a smartphone—the Xiaomi 17 series—both have been tested on reference design devices to evaluate their performance against each other.

Performance Benchmarks

According to tests done by Xiaobai’s Tech Reviews, the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 achieved a single-core score of 3,831 and a multi-core score of 12,459 on Geekbench 6. In contrast, the Dimensity 9500 managed to score 3,635 in single-core and 10,941 in multi-core tests, clearly showing its weakness.

Graphics Performance

When it comes to GPU performance, the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 scored 8,492 on the 3DMark WildLife Extreme test. The Dimensity 9500 is close behind with a score of 8,251. Interestingly, both chipsets showed similar results on GFXBench’s 1440P Aztec test, with the Qualcomm chipset reaching 157 FPS compared to MediaTek’s 155 FPS. Notably, both chipsets significantly outperform the Apple A19 Pro in these benchmarks.

Conclusion

In summary, Qualcomm seems to have the upper hand over MediaTek once more. The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 surpasses the Dimensity 9500 in both CPU and GPU tests, although it’s important to mention that all evaluations were done using OEM reference design devices.

Source:
Link