Tag: Ryzen 9 9950X

  • Apple M3 Ultra Beats Ryzen 9 9950X & Core Ultra 9 by 30% in Cinebench 2024

    Apple M3 Ultra Beats Ryzen 9 9950X & Core Ultra 9 by 30% in Cinebench 2024

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Apple Mac Studio now features the M3 Ultra chip, boasting a 32-core CPU and an 80-core GPU for top-tier performance.
    2. The M3 Ultra outperforms high-end x86 processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Intel Core Ultra 9 285K in Cinebench 2024 benchmarks.
    3. Apple’s M3 Ultra excels in CPU-intensive tasks and supports up to 512 GB of unified memory for demanding workloads.
    4. Future benchmarks will clarify the M3 Ultra’s potential, but it currently leads in efficiency and multi-core performance for consumer systems.
    5. Upcoming AMD Zen 6 CPUs may challenge the M3 Ultra, but currently, the M3 Ultra stands out in the market.

    The Apple Mac Studio has been updated and is an impressive machine, to put it lightly. At its peak configuration, it can come with the M3 Ultra chip, a powerful SoC. This chip features a 32-core CPU and a gigantic 80-core GPU, delivering performance that stands out as the best a Mac can provide and ranks among the top for systems under 500 watts. There’s hardly any x86 product that can compete with the M3 Ultra, as it occupies a unique space where it easily outshines high-end consumer processors, but unsurprisingly doesn’t reach the core counts of server-grade chips.

    Comparisons with x86 Systems

    For example, a high-end x86 system priced similarly to the Mac Studio would probably have either a 16-core AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (currently listed at $544.74 on Amazon) or a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 9 285K processor. Cinebench 2024 shows that the 32-core M3 Ultra dominates both of these x86 systems. With a score of 3,000, the M3 Ultra outperforms the Ryzen 9 9950X by 25% and the Core Ultra 9 285K by about 30%. This is expected, given the significantly higher core count of the M3 Ultra.

    Performance Insights

    Nevertheless, it’s clear that the Apple M3 Ultra will excel in most CPU-intensive tasks compared to any x86 consumer desktop available today. As previously mentioned, the M3 Ultra’s GPU performs somewhere in between the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX 5080, but actual performance can vary based on the specific tasks. Additionally, the ability to configure the M3 Ultra with up to 512 GB of unified memory lets it handle workloads that weren’t feasible on a consumer desktop before now.

    Future Testing and Developments

    As more benchmarks and tests come to light, the true potential of the M3 Ultra will likely become more defined. While it’s evident that it will lead in overall efficiency, actual performance will depend on how well software developers adapt their applications to leverage this impressive hardware. There are whispers that AMD’s upcoming Zen 6 CPUs will feature up to 24 performance cores, which could pose a real challenge to the M3 Ultra. But for the time being, it’s apparent that Apple’s top-tier model reigns supreme in multi-core performance for consumer systems.

    Source:
    Link

    Apple M3 Ultra Beats Ryzen 9 9950X & Core Ultra 9 by 30% in Cinebench 2024
    Tags: , ,
  • AMD Ryzen 9 9950X Passively Cooled at 95°C Without Performance Loss

    AMD Ryzen 9 9950X Passively Cooled at 95°C Without Performance Loss

    Fanless systems are not exactly everywhere, but there are some passively cooled PCs with strong components that are quite uncommon. Recently, Asus showcased a brand new ProArt workstation case called the PA401 Wood Edition, which features a passively cooled Ryzen 9 9950X CPU. This sounds really impressive, but there are some important details to consider.

    Performance Under Pressure

    In the video, the 16-core Ryzen 9 9950X was shown running with its standard TDP settings, reaching a high temperature of 95° Celsius and drawing a maximum power of 225 watts. The cooling solution for this setup was a Noctua NH-P1 passive cooler. The video highlighted the gaming performance of the system, which appeared to be generally smooth, and it handled tasks quite well. There was also a demonstration of a Cinebench R23 test, showing that there was no noticeable dip in peak performance during the run.

    The Catch

    However, as previously noted, there’s a little hitch in this story – while the CPU itself was passively cooled, there were several fans in place to cool the rest of the system, including the GPU, and a case fan located right in front of the CPU heatsink. This indicates that the system had sufficient airflow, and it won’t be as quiet as a true fanless setup. Interestingly, Apple’s Mac Pro, even the Xeon-W models, also doesn’t have actively cooled components and instead uses three large front-facing fans to keep the individual heat sinks cool during heavy use. The Mac Pro earned a lot of praise for its quiet performance, suggesting that Asus may be trying to create something similar with its ProArt PA401 case.

    Source: Link

    Image 1
    Tags: , ,
  • Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Beats i9-14900K by 11%, Lags vs Ryzen 9 9950X

    Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Beats i9-14900K by 11%, Lags vs Ryzen 9 9950X

    Intel has recently introduced its Arrow Lake-S series of desktop CPUs, and true to Intel’s style, there are some unique features. This time, the x86 giant has opted for a focus on efficiency, claiming that its new lineup delivers performance similar to the previous Raptor Lake-R models while consuming significantly less power.

    Benchmark Leaks Surface

    As expected, benchmark leaks for the new series are surfacing online. A recent leak highlights the single- and multi-threaded performance of the top-of-the-line Core Ultra 9 285K in CPU-Z and Blender. For those keeping track, the results are both surprising and underwhelming, especially considering that the Arrow Lake-S series lacks hyper-threading support, which might upset some users.

    Performance Insights

    In a prior Passmark test, the Core Ultra 9 285K showcased notable improvements in single-threaded performance, easily taking the top spot. However, due to the absence of hyper-threading, the 285K struggled against last-generation offerings from both AMD and Intel. In the new CPU-Z benchmark leak, the narrative changes. The Core Ultra 9 285K shows an 11% gain in multi-threaded performance, although it still falls short compared to the 14900KS and 14900K in single-threaded tasks.

    Thermal Concerns

    Interestingly, the benchmark results indicate that the Core Ultra 9 285K reached temperatures exceeding 100 degrees C, suggesting that the CPU experienced significant thermal throttling. Nevertheless, it did achieve peak speeds of 5.5 GHz on its P-cores and 4.6 GHz on its E-cores. Whether there was more performance to be had is uncertain, but it’s known that an ASRock Z890 motherboard was used alongside 2 x 16 GB of DDR5-5600 RAM and an RTX 4080 Super.

    Blender Results

    Turning to the Blender benchmark outcomes, the data shows that the Core Ultra 9 285K surpasses the i9-14900K by a notable margin of over 14%, yet it is clearly outperformed by AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X, which leads the 285K by nearly 7%. The specifics of the hardware used in these tests remain unclear, indicating that the results may not fully reflect real-world performance.

    momomo_us, 9550pro via Twitter

    Image 1
    Tags: , ,
  • Core Ultra 7 265K Beats Ryzen 9 9950X, Outperforms i7-14700K

    Core Ultra 7 265K Beats Ryzen 9 9950X, Outperforms i7-14700K

    Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 200S “Arrow Lake” CPUs is set to be released on October 24th. However, even before the reviews are officially published, details about the performance of the Core Ultra 200S chips have been leaking consistently. For example, it seems that the top-tier Core Ultra 9 285K will probably not surpass the performance of the Core i9-14900K in gaming scenarios.

    New Benchmark Findings

    Adding to the collection of Arrow Lake information, there’s a new benchmark result for the Core Ultra 7 265K. Recently, Intel’s 20-core Core Ultra 7 265K was listed on the SiSoftware website, showing performance that outshines the Ryzen 9 9950X.

    The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scored an average of 841.50 GOPS in the “Processor Arithmetic” test from SiSoftware. This score is approximately 2% higher than the Ryzen 9 9950X’s score of 828.40, 4.4% quicker than the Core i9-14900KS, and 6.2% faster than the Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7950X.

    Performance Comparison

    When comparing it with the previous generation Core i7-14700K, the Core Ultra 7 265K shows a considerable improvement of 29%. This is quite fascinating since both CPUs have the same number of cores, but the Core Ultra 7 265K has only 20 threads compared to the 28 threads in the Core i7-14700K (Available on Amazon).

    In other words, Intel seems to have fulfilled its promise of a greater than 15% boost in multithreaded performance from generation to generation, and the absence of hyperthreading does not appear to hinder the performance of the Core Ultra 200 Arrow Lake-S CPUs.

    Marketing Strategy Insights

    Thanks to a leaked slide, it’s evident that the Core Ultra 9 285K will lag behind the Zen 5 CPUs in gaming, a trend that might persist until Panther Lake debuts next year. So, what’s Intel’s game plan for promoting the Arrow Lake CPUs to buyers?

    In their launch communication, Intel mainly promotes the Core Ultra 200 CPUs as superior productivity chips that consume 50% less power than their 14th-generation counterparts and operate cooler. The company is also heavily emphasizing the “AI” aspect, claiming a doubling of throughput.

    Overall, gamers seeking the highest performance may find this Intel generation disappointing. However, for others, the Arrow Lake chips could prove to be solid options.

    Buy the Intel Core i9-14900K on Amazon

    @momomo_us on X, SiSoftware, Teaser image: Intel, Aditya Doula on Unsplash, edited

    Image 1
    Tags: , ,