Tag: Core Ultra 9 285K

  • Intel Arrow Lake Review: Core Ultra 200S CPUs’ Efficiency vs. Gaming

    Intel Arrow Lake Review: Core Ultra 200S CPUs’ Efficiency vs. Gaming

    The introduction of the Intel Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200S CPUs has stirred up quite a bit of debate. On one side, these new processors don’t really offer significant performance improvements and actually lag behind in gaming performance. On the flip side, Intel has indeed kept its word regarding a substantial boost in efficiency.

    Mixed Reviews

    With a multitude of reviews flooding in, it can be quite challenging for consumers to accurately assess the true capabilities of these products. Different publications have their own methods for testing CPUs, leading to varied results. Luckily, 3DCenter has gathered 20 reviews of the Arrow Lake launch, providing a comprehensive overview of Intel’s latest desktop processors.

    Performance Insights

    From what we can gather, the Arrow Lake CPUs show a slight but not particularly impressive increase in application performance. According to the data from 3DCenter, the top-end Core Ultra 9 285K is about 7% faster than the Core i9-14900K, but it is also 3% slower than the Ryzen 9 9950X.

    Dropping down the lineup, the Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 7 265K present performance boosts of 3.9% and 4.6% over the Core i5-14600K and Core i7-14700K, correspondingly. In addition, the Core Ultra 5 245K is 3.5% faster compared to the Ryzen 7 9700X, while the Core Ultra 7 265K matches the Ryzen 9 9900X’s performance.

    Gaming Performance Woes

    In a nutshell, Intel’s Arrow Lake chips offer a marginal enhancement over the 14th-gen models, but they lack hyperthreading. Unfortunately, the gaming performance takes a hit, with these CPUs generally underperforming compared to both their predecessors and the competing Zen 5 series.

    For example, the Core Ultra 9 285K is about 6% behind the Core i9-14900K and trails the Ryzen 9 9950X by 4.2%. It also cannot compete with the leading gaming processor, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which is a staggering 16% faster. This news is a letdown for Intel enthusiasts, particularly with the recent announcement of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which claims a 20% increase in gaming performance over the Core Ultra 9 285K.

    The Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 5 245K don’t perform much better either, with the former showing a 7% drop against the Core i7-14700K and the latter lagging by 4% against the Core i5-14600K. Furthermore, both the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 9 9900X outperform their Intel counterparts by 10% and 3.3%, respectively.

    Future Considerations

    In short, Intel supporters hoping for their favorite brand to surpass AMD will likely have to be patient for upcoming architectures like Panther Lake and Nova Lake, as Intel currently lacks a competitive response.

    One area where the Core Ultra 200S CPUs excel is in power consumption. Thanks to various enhancements, such as a new process node and the removal of hyperthreading, Intel has achieved significant reductions in power usage compared to the 14th-gen Raptor Lake CPUs. This topic has been explored in depth in our review of the Core Ultra 9 285K.

    Efficiency Gains

    According to 3DCenter’s data, the Core Ultra 9 285K has an average power consumption of just 147 W during application workloads, compared to 198 W for the Core i9-14900K and 160 W for the Ryzen 9 9950X. This lower energy usage allows the flagship Arrow Lake chip to boast 44% better energy efficiency in applications compared to the Core i9-14900K and 6% better against the Ryzen 9 9950X.

    The efficiency of Arrow Lake is also clear in gaming scenarios, where the Core Ultra 9 285K consumes roughly 88 W on average, outperforming both the Core i9-14900K (140 W) and the Ryzen 9 9950X (111 W). The only CPU that is faster in gaming and uses less power is the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which stands out at just 56 W.

    Conclusion

    Turning to the Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 7 265K, these Arrow Lake models show application efficiency gains of 33% and 42% compared to the Core i5-14600K and Core i7-14700K, respectively. Nevertheless, the Ryzen 7 9700X remains more efficient than the Core Ultra 5 245K by 16%, and the Ryzen 9 9900X is still slightly behind the Core Ultra 7 265K by 9%.

    In conclusion, the gaming power consumption for both the Core Ultra 5 and Ultra 7 is lower than that of their 14th-gen counterparts and AMD’s Zen 5 processors, registering at only 68 W and 80 W, respectively.

    To summarize, Intel’s Arrow Lake chips seem to be aimed at users who are either upgrading from older architectures or are in search of processors that emphasize efficiency over raw performance. For everyone else, better alternatives are readily available in the market.

    Buy the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Ultra 7 265K on Amazon

    3DCenter

    Image 1
    Image 1
    Image 1
    Tags: , ,
  • Intel Core Ultra 285K Sold Out, Restock Expected This Weekend

    Intel Core Ultra 285K Sold Out, Restock Expected This Weekend

    Yesterday, on October 25th, Intel introduced the Core Ultra processors, also referred to as the Arrow Lake-S CPUs. Shortly after, retailers began listing this new generation on their websites. Even though reviews about gaming performance are mixed, the top model, the Core Ultra 9 285K, appears to be performing well in sales.

    Quick Sell-Out in Japan

    Recent reports from Akiba indicate that the flagship processor sold out almost immediately in Japan. One retailer mentioned that the initial supply was quite limited. Regardless, it looks like the Core Ultra 9 285K is completely out of stock now.

    Availability in Tokyo

    Currently, the only places you can purchase it are Tsukumo PC and Tsukumo eX in Tokyo. Here, the seller has bundled it with the Intel Z890 motherboard or is selling it in bulk. This is a great option for customers looking to get the new LGA 1851 motherboard together with the processor. According to the Akiba report, a store employee said that shoppers should be able to buy the CPU this weekend.

    US Retailers Check

    In the US, we did a quick check on major retailers such as Amazon, Best Buy, and Newegg. As of now, the Core Ultra 9 285K is out of stock on both Newegg and Best Buy. On the other hand, it doesn’t appear to be listed on Amazon. For those interested, the Core Ultra 7 265K is available for $404 on Amazon, making it the next best option.

    If you happened to miss it, after launching the Core Ultra 200V processors in September, Intel has now launched its next series of CPUs—the Core Ultra 200 desktop series. Alongside these processors, Intel has also introduced the Intel Z890, which features the new LGA 1851 socket.

    Image 1
    Tags: , ,
  • Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Beats i9-14900K by 11%, Lags vs Ryzen 9 9950X

    Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Beats i9-14900K by 11%, Lags vs Ryzen 9 9950X

    Intel has recently introduced its Arrow Lake-S series of desktop CPUs, and true to Intel’s style, there are some unique features. This time, the x86 giant has opted for a focus on efficiency, claiming that its new lineup delivers performance similar to the previous Raptor Lake-R models while consuming significantly less power.

    Benchmark Leaks Surface

    As expected, benchmark leaks for the new series are surfacing online. A recent leak highlights the single- and multi-threaded performance of the top-of-the-line Core Ultra 9 285K in CPU-Z and Blender. For those keeping track, the results are both surprising and underwhelming, especially considering that the Arrow Lake-S series lacks hyper-threading support, which might upset some users.

    Performance Insights

    In a prior Passmark test, the Core Ultra 9 285K showcased notable improvements in single-threaded performance, easily taking the top spot. However, due to the absence of hyper-threading, the 285K struggled against last-generation offerings from both AMD and Intel. In the new CPU-Z benchmark leak, the narrative changes. The Core Ultra 9 285K shows an 11% gain in multi-threaded performance, although it still falls short compared to the 14900KS and 14900K in single-threaded tasks.

    Thermal Concerns

    Interestingly, the benchmark results indicate that the Core Ultra 9 285K reached temperatures exceeding 100 degrees C, suggesting that the CPU experienced significant thermal throttling. Nevertheless, it did achieve peak speeds of 5.5 GHz on its P-cores and 4.6 GHz on its E-cores. Whether there was more performance to be had is uncertain, but it’s known that an ASRock Z890 motherboard was used alongside 2 x 16 GB of DDR5-5600 RAM and an RTX 4080 Super.

    Blender Results

    Turning to the Blender benchmark outcomes, the data shows that the Core Ultra 9 285K surpasses the i9-14900K by a notable margin of over 14%, yet it is clearly outperformed by AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X, which leads the 285K by nearly 7%. The specifics of the hardware used in these tests remain unclear, indicating that the results may not fully reflect real-world performance.

    momomo_us, 9550pro via Twitter

    Image 1
    Tags: , ,
  • Intel Arrow Lake-S: Core Ultra 9 285K, 7 265K, 5 245K Specs Confirmed

    Intel Arrow Lake-S: Core Ultra 9 285K, 7 265K, 5 245K Specs Confirmed

    Intel’s new Arrow Lake-S series of desktop CPUs is under a lot of pressure to compete against AMD’s strong push in the CPU market. We had some clues about what to expect, but a recent leaked slide has revealed the complete lineup, confirming what we can look forward to.

    What’s Included in the Lineup

    The slide shows that the Arrow Lake-S series will feature five different models. Leading the pack is the Core Ultra 9 285K CPU, which boasts 24 cores but, unfortunately, has only 24 threads due to the lack of hyperthreading. These cores are divided into 16 ‘Skymont’ efficiency cores and 8 ‘Lion Cove’ performance cores. This CPU can reach speeds of up to 5.7 GHz and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.

    Mid-Tier Options

    Following that, the series includes the Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 265KF CPUs. Both of these models come equipped with 8 performance cores and 12 efficiency cores, summing up to 20 cores and 20 threads. Like the previous model, neither supports hyperthreading. The Core Ultra 7 265KF, as indicated by its name, lacks integrated graphics, while the Core Ultra 7 265K includes an integrated GPU with 4 Xe cores running at 2.0 GHz. Additionally, the ‘KF’ version does not support Intel vPro and SIPP features.

    Entry-Level Choices

    Lastly, we have the Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 5 245KF CPUs. Both models feature a 14-core setup with 6 efficiency and 8 performance cores. The situation is similar to the earlier variants: the Core Ultra 5 245K has an integrated GPU with 4 Xe cores clocked at a slightly lower speed of 1.9 GHz and includes vPro and SIPP support, while the 245KF model does not have these features.

    All CPUs in this lineup support up to 192 GB of dual-channel DDR5-6400 RAM and come with 24 PCIe lanes. Intel is set to officially announce these new CPUs in the near future, but getting a sneak peek like this is always exciting. Based on the leaked performance tests of the Core Ultra 9 285K, it seems that Intel’s Arrow Lake-S series is expected to deliver impressive single-threaded performance.

    Purchase Recommendation

    HXL via Twitter

    Image 1
    Tags: , ,
  • Core Ultra 9 285K vs i9-14900K: Power Use and Gaming Speed

    Core Ultra 9 285K vs i9-14900K: Power Use and Gaming Speed

    Intel’s Arrow Lake-S performance details have been leaked by a Chinese news source just days before its official release, and the results aren’t particularly impressive. The top-tier Core Ultra 9 285K appears to be slower than Intel’s fastest current generation Raptor Lake-R. Additionally, AMD’s Ryzen 7000X3D series outperforms it in demanding gaming situations. The lone positive note here is that Arrow Lake boasts better power efficiency.

    Performance Comparisons

    The Core Ultra 9 285K only trails the i9-14900K by a few frames per second. According to the leak, the Arrow Lake-S chip averages 261 fps, while the i9-14900K averages 264 fps. Interestingly, the information suggests that Intel is showing total system power usage rather than just CPU power. The Core Ultra 9 285K system is 80 W more efficient, while matching the performance levels of the Raptor Lake-R system.

    Focus on Efficiency

    It seems that raw performance is not the main goal for the new Arrow Lake series. Instead, Intel’s enhanced manufacturing method allows for lower thermal design power (TDP) with similar performance levels, or in some cases, up to 15% better performance. Another slide indicates that the Core Ultra 9 285K matches the i9-14900K while consuming 34-58 W less power, and certain games may experience a performance boost of 4-6% with a TDP reduction of up to 165 W. However, the specifics of the TDPs for the 15% performance improvement in F1 23 are unclear.

    Competitive Edge

    The leak also features two slides that pit the Core Ultra 9 285K against AMD’s older and newer Ryzen 9000 series processors. In productivity tests, the Arrow Lake-S flagship model outperforms the Ryzen 9 7950X3D by as much as 30%. Intel has consistently held an advantage in productivity and content creation for several generations. On the gaming front, though, the Arrow Lake-S is sometimes 15% faster, but it can be up to 21% slower in titles like Cyberpunk 2077, making it generally slower. Furthermore, Intel isn’t comparing it to the 7800X3D, which continues to be the top performer in gaming.

    When compared to the Ryzen 9 9950X, the Core Ultra 9 285K is mostly even, achieving three wins and five losses, giving it a slight overall performance edge of 0.26%. This slide is not particularly useful since it fails to specify the TDPs for any of the CPUs. Additionally, there is a note indicating that the results utilize Application Optimized (APO) code, which typically skews results in favor of Intel.

    Image 1
    Image 1
    Image 1
    Image 1
    Tags: , ,
  • 24-Core Core Ultra 9 285K CPU Leaks for Gaming PC

    24-Core Core Ultra 9 285K CPU Leaks for Gaming PC

    Intel is about to launch its new Arrow Lake-S series of desktop CPUs very soon. The top model in this series, the 24-core, 24-thread Core Ultra 9 285K, is expected to offer significant improvements in single-thread performance, according to some recently leaked PassMark scores.

    Product Details Leaked

    A leaked product page for HP’s Omen 35L pre-built gaming tower has disclosed that it will come equipped with the Core Ultra 9 285K Arrow Lake-S CPU, which boasts a boost clock speed of 5.7 GHz. It can also support up to 64 GB of DDR5 RAM. Interestingly, the memory speed is noted as 4000 MT/s, which seems quite low and likely a mistake. On the graphics front, HP is also going all out, featuring options with Nvidia’s powerful RTX 4090.

    Performance Expectations

    Intel’s Arrow Lake-S series will not include hyperthreading support, and early benchmarks seem to showcase this change. However, single-threaded performance is expected to see a notable rise, as shown by recent tests. It remains uncertain if these potential performance boosts will be sufficient for the struggling chip giant to reclaim its position as a key player in gaming performance.

    Competitive Landscape

    With fierce competition from AMD and Apple’s custom chips, Intel is under significant pressure. Their new Lunar Lake mobile platform has been well received, and the Arrow Lake-S desktop CPUs have a lot at stake as they aim to attract gamers and creators once more.

    momomo_us via Twitter

    Tags: , ,
  • Intel Arrow Lake CPUs: Potential Lower Clock Speeds vs. i9 14900KS

    Intel Arrow Lake CPUs: Potential Lower Clock Speeds vs. i9 14900KS

    Intel recently unveiled its Meteor Lake processors at the close of last year, with anticipation building around the upcoming Arrow Lake desktop CPUs slated for release later in the year. Leaks have revealed the initial Arrow Lake CPUs to be named Core Ultra 9 285K, Core Ultra 7 265K, and Core Ultra 5 245K.

    Lower Clock Speeds on Core Ultra 9 285K

    A recent leak from tipster MebiuW on Weibo has hinted that the Core Ultra 9 285K, viewed as the successor to the i9 14900KS, will operate at a clock speed 700MHz lower than the 14900KS. While the 14900KS can reach speeds of up to 6.2GHz, the 285K is expected to top out at 5.5GHz.

    Performance and Stability Enhancements

    Despite the 12% clock speed advantage of the 14900KS over the upcoming 285K, the Arrow Lake CPU is projected to offer improved performance and stability. Although the 285K is expected to have slightly higher single-core performance than the 14900KS due to a lower clock speed, overall enhancements are anticipated over the instability experienced with the 13th and 14th generation Core i9 CPUs.

    Focus on Stability and Efficiency

    Intel’s move towards prioritizing stability alongside performance is evident with the Arrow Lake CPUs. The company seems to be addressing concerns regarding the instability and power efficiency of previous generation chips, which have faced issues such as crashes during demanding tasks, potentially attributed to high temperatures.

    The Core Ultra 9 285K is forecasted to boast 24 cores and 24 threads, featuring 8 Lion Cove P-Core architecture cores and 16 Skymont E-Core architecture cores. Questions remain about whether the unlocked K-series chips will adopt the 20A or TSMC’s 3nm process node.

    Intel Arrow Lake CPUs: Potential Lower Clock Speeds vs. i9 14900KS
    Tags: ,