Tag: Arc 140V

  • AMD’s Radeon 890M Laptops Narrow Gap with Intel in Graphics Race

    AMD’s Radeon 890M Laptops Narrow Gap with Intel in Graphics Race

    Key Takeaways

    1. AMD has a strong advantage over Intel since the Radeon 680M’s release in 2022, outperforming Intel’s Iris Xe 96 EUs by 30 to 50 percent.
    2. Intel’s new Arc 8 graphics reduced the performance gap with AMD but was limited to Core H-series laptops, which are less common.
    3. Intel’s latest integrated graphics, the Arc 130V, 140V, and 140T, do not require Core H-series laptops, making them more accessible.
    4. The new Intel models show a performance improvement of 10 to 15 percent over the previous Arc 8, making them competitive with AMD.
    5. Despite improvements, AMD’s Radeon 890M still outperforms the Arc 140V in most games by about 10 percent, with larger gaps in specific titles.

    AMD has maintained a strong advantage over Intel since the introduction of the Radeon 680M in 2022. At that point, Intel’s top integrated option, the Iris Xe 96 EUs, fell short, lagging behind the Radeon 680M by 30 to 50 percent. The gap widened slightly in favor of AMD with the release of the Radeon 780M.

    Intel’s New Strategy

    When Intel debuted the successor to the Iris Xe 96 EUs, named Arc 8, it successfully reduced the performance divide with AMD. However, the downside was that Arc 8 was limited to the more powerful Core H-series laptops, which are not as prevalent as their Core U-series and Ryzen U-series counterparts.

    Latest Intel Graphics

    The most recent integrated graphics lineup from Intel features the Arc 130V, 140V, and 140T. The V-series addresses the previous issue by eliminating the need for a Core H-series laptop to access Intel’s latest iGPU. Moreover, these new models provide a performance boost of about 10 to 15 percent over the Arc 8, as noted in 3DMark benchmarks. This improvement in both raw performance and performance-per-watt has made Intel’s integrated solutions competitive against AMD’s top offerings—a notable change after many years.

    Despite these advancements, the power-hungry Radeon 890M still surpasses the average Arc 140V in most games by approximately 10 percent. In specific titles, such as Tiny Tina’s Wonderlands, the difference can reach 20 percent, while games like Cyberpunk 2077 often result in a close match between both GPUs before factoring in any upscaling technologies. Nonetheless, Intel’s current progress appears promising if they can maintain their momentum in future generations.

    Tags: , ,
  • Fastest and Slowest Arc 140V Laptops for Gaming: Tested Models

    Fastest and Slowest Arc 140V Laptops for Gaming: Tested Models

    Key Takeaways

    After trailing significantly behind AMD during the Iris Xe and Arc 8 generations, the new Arc 130V, Arc 140V, and Arc 140T products have been performing impressively, now competing directly with AMD’s top integrated solutions. The Arc 140V is expected to become as prevalent as the Iris Xe 96 EUs, especially since it is standard in ULV Core Ultra 7 laptops. Our comparison charts below display the many individual models currently available at the time of this writing featuring Arc 140V graphics.

    Performance Insights

    One key point to note is that the performance differences among these models are quite slim compared to earlier generations. For instance, the fastest laptops equipped with the Iris Xe 96 EUs can sometimes be twice as fast as the slowest models also using the Iris Xe 96 EUs. In contrast, laptops featuring the Arc 140V are likely to deliver more consistent performance, largely due to the built-in VRAM throughout the series that effectively removes any sluggish single-channel options. Buyers looking for Arc 140V graphics typically won’t have to fret about unintentionally selecting a very slow model.

    Options for Enthusiasts

    Certainly, power users might still prefer to steer clear of the slowest choices or opt for the fastest models when they can. In this regard, the Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250, Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition, or MSI Claw 8 AI+ stand out as some of the quickest options for gaming, showing results that can be up to 10 percent quicker than the average. Conversely, the Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406, Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Aura 15ILL9, or Dell XPS 13 9350 are on the slower side, with performance that can be anywhere from 10 to 15 percent below the average depending on the game title.

    Tags: , ,