Key Takeaways
1. Nvidia’s RTX 5050 is a budget-friendly graphics card priced at $249, outperforming the older RTX 3050 but underperforming compared to the RTX 4060 and AMD’s RX 6000 series mobile GPUs.
2. In benchmark tests, the RTX 5050 scored 1,978 in FurMark at 4K resolution and could boost up to 2.94 GHz, but still fell short of the AMD Radeon RX 6600M and Nvidia’s RTX 2060.
3. The RTX 5050’s performance concerns arise as it is priced only $50 less than the RTX 5060, which offers better specifications like a higher CUDA core count and newer GDDR7 memory.
4. Testing for the RTX 5050 used an older Intel Core i7-9700 CPU, which may have affected the benchmark results, and the FurMark test focused more on cooling than true GPU performance.
5. There are concerns that partner companies may price the RTX 5050 above its MSRP, potentially aligning closer to the RTX 5060’s price point.
Nvidia recently introduced its budget-friendly RTX 5050 desktop graphics card, priced at $249. They showcased its performance against the older RTX 3050 and the more recent RTX 4060. While the RTX 5050 clearly outshines the RTX 30 series, it does fall short compared to the RTX 40 series in terms of raw power. A recent leak from a third-party benchmark, however, suggests that it also lags behind AMD’s RX 6000 series mobile GPUs as well as Nvidia’s own RTX 20 series.
Benchmark Results
Screenshots provided by Richard Huynh through GPU Magick reveal the FurMark benchmark results at 4K resolution. The Palit RTX 5050, using an older OpenGL driver, managed to score 1,978 and could boost up to 2,940 MHz (or 2.94 GHz). According to Nvidia’s specifications, the RTX 5050 has a boost clock of 2.57 GHz, making the FurMark results quite impressive. Unfortunately, the score still places it below the AMD Radeon RX 6600M laptop GPU and the desktop RTX 2060, which is not ideal.
Performance Comparison
It’s worth mentioning that the RTX 3050, which Nvidia uses as a benchmark for the RTX 5050, performed significantly worse in the FurMark score database. The lower performance compared to the AMD laptop GPU from two generations back and the Nvidia desktop GPU from three generations ago raises concerns for the RTX 5050, especially since it is priced only $50 less than the RTX 5060.
Testing Conditions
Additionally, the FurMark test for the RTX 5050 was conducted using an older Intel Core i7-9700 CPU, which lacks support for PCIe Gen 4. Moreover, the 4K benchmark was primarily designed to evaluate cooling rather than the true performance of a GPU. Given this context, the thermal results appear somewhat misleading since the GPU reportedly reached a maximum core temperature of only 39 degrees Celsius under full load.
While the FurMark leak may not be entirely reliable, it does bring up important questions regarding the RTX 5050’s overall value. Even though this card is the most affordable option in the RTX 50 series, partner companies are likely to set prices above the MSRP, inching closer to the RTX 5060’s price, which boasts a significantly higher CUDA core count along with newer GDDR7 memory.
Source:
Link
Leave a Reply