Key Takeaways
1. The Google Pixel 9a shows strong performance on Geekbench and AnTuTu, surpassing the Galaxy A56 in benchmarks.
2. It scores 1,530 in single-core and 3,344 in multi-core tests on Geekbench, with an AnTuTu score of 1,049,844.
3. The Pixel 9a’s performance may improve before launch due to pre-launch software and potential cooling system limitations.
4. While it performs well for a mid-range device, Google’s Tensor chips typically lag behind Qualcomm in performance and efficiency.
5. Future updates will be important to assess the Pixel 9a’s thermal management and everyday performance capabilities.
The Google Pixel 9a has recently been spotted on Geekbench and AnTuTu ahead of its official release. The performance results indicate that this mid-range device stands strong against its flagship counterparts in the Pixel 9 series. In fact, it even surpasses its rival, the Galaxy A56.
Performance Insights
As per information shared by Sahil Karoul, the Google Pixel 9a, which runs on Google’s Tensor G4 chipset, scored 1,530 in single-core and 3,344 in multi-core tests on Geekbench 6. Additionally, on AnTuTu, it achieved a composite score of 1,049,844, breaking down into a CPU score of 260,567 and a GPU score of 434,441.
Understanding Benchmark Limitations
Although these scores are somewhat lower than those of the pricier Pixel 9 model (with averages of 1,925 single-core and 5,674 multi-core), it’s crucial to remember that the Pixel 9a was using pre-launch software during testing. It probably also has a less efficient cooling system, which might account for the performance gap.
To put this into perspective, the Galaxy A56, another mid-range competitor, scored 1,364 and 3,899 on Geekbench for single and multi-core tests, respectively. Its AnTuTu score of 908,689 does not match the Pixel 9a’s, indicating that the Pixel 9a not only offers robust performance but also benefits from a clean and lightweight user interface.
Considerations on Performance
However, we should keep in mind that Google’s Tensor chips have generally lagged behind Qualcomm’s offerings in both performance and power efficiency. Benchmarks do not fully capture sustained performance, which is crucial for prolonged use—especially if you plan to game for an extended period or record in 4K 60 fps for more than just a few minutes.
While the initial benchmark results look encouraging, we still need to see if the thermal management and performance optimization can support everyday tasks effectively. More updates should come to light as we move closer to the launch date.
Source:
Link
Leave a Reply