AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme Leaks on Geekbench with MSI Claw Handheld

Key Takeaways

1. AMD’s Ryzen Z2 Extreme APU is built on the Strix Point architecture and features two CPU clusters: three Zen 5 cores and five Zen 5c cores.
2. In Geekbench 6.4, the Ryzen Z2 Extreme achieved single-core and multi-core scores of 2,748 and 12,182, respectively, outperforming the previous Ryzen Z1 Extreme.
3. The APU’s boost clock is capped at 4.3 GHz, lower than the promised 5.0 GHz.
4. It has 16 GB of DDR5 memory running at a relatively slow 1,944 MT/s.
5. The integrated Radeon 890M GPU shows significant performance improvements, scoring 45,064 in Vulkan and 37,970 in OpenCL tests, making it up to 52% faster than the Radeon 780M.


AMD has been, and continues to be, quite secretive about the details of its upcoming Ryzen Z2 Extreme APU designed for handheld gaming devices. Earlier speculations suggested that this APU would be built on Team Red’s latest Strix Point architecture. A recent listing on Geekbench supports this theory by showing two separate CPU clusters: one featuring three cores (likely Zen 5) and another with five Zen 5c cores. This chip is set to power MSI’s new AMD-based Claw 8, which has already been tested with the same processor.

Performance Scores

In Geekbench 6.4, it achieved scores of 2,748 for single-core and 12,182 for multi-core performance. In comparison, the previous Ryzen Z1 Extreme managed scores of 2,534 and 11,358 in the same test. A quick look at its Geekbench listing suggests that the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is not operating at its promised boost clock of around 5.0 GHz, as this sample is capped at 4.3 GHz.

Memory Specifications

The Geekbench listing also indicates that the 16 GB of memory runs at 1,944 MT/s, which is considered quite slow for DDR5 memory. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme includes AMD’s RDNA 3.5-based Radeon 890M integrated GPU. It scored 45,064 and 37,970 points in Geekbench’s Vulkan and OpenCL tests, respectively, making it potentially up to 52% faster than the previous generation Radeon 780M. Overall, this chip appears to be a strong contender, and it will be fascinating to see how it performs at lower power levels.

Source:
link


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *