Key Takeaways
1. The GT7’s flat screen will have the highest PWM value for smartphones at 4,608Hz and include DC dimming for flicker-free gaming.
2. The upcoming Dimensity 9400+ model will match the peak brightness of 6,500 nits, although everyday usage brightness may only reach 1,800 nits.
3. The GT7 will feature a touch-sampling rate of at least 2,600Hz, allowing for operation with wet or gloved hands.
4. It will offer a 1.5K resolution and a 144Hz refresh rate, targeting e-sports gameplay, with a price of 2,999 yuan (approximately $411).
5. The 6.8-inch display will have an “ultra-narrow” 1.3mm bezel and an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, but will use a less energy-efficient LTPS backplane.
The GT7’s flat screen is set to launch with the highest PWM value ever for smartphones, reaching an impressive 4,608Hz. It will also feature DC dimming, which helps users enjoy longer flicker-free gaming experiences. Furthermore, Realme has announced that its upcoming Dimensity 9400+ model will match the peak brightness of 6,500 nits found in its Pro version, which is currently available starting at €649 on Amazon in Europe.
Display Performance
However, in everyday usage, the brightness may only reach around 1,800 nits at most. The GT7 is expected to boast an ultra-responsive display, designed to function even when users have wet or gloved hands. This means it will feature a remarkable touch-sampling rate of at least 2,600Hz.
Gaming Features
These features are geared towards enhancing e-sports gameplay, with a 1.5K resolution and a refresh rate of 144Hz. In fact, Realme promotes the GT7 as having the “strongest” display with these specifications, set to be priced at 2,999 yuan (approximately $411) or less, launching within 5 days on April 18, 2025.
Premium Experience
The display promises a high-end experience, complemented by an “ultra-narrow” 1.3mm bezel and an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor. However, well-known leaker Digital Chat Station has claimed that the 6.8-inch display will use an LTPS backplane from BOE, which is less energy-efficient compared to the LTPO option.
Source:
Link