Key Takeaways
1. Glen Schofield reflects on his decade-long experience at EA and Activision, highlighting their roles as major talent development hubs in the gaming industry.
2. Recent shifts in ownership, such as EA’s deal involving Saudi Arabia’s PIF, signify a new era for both EA and Activision, impacting their status in the industry.
3. Schofield contrasts the structured environment of EA with the chaotic yet passionate atmosphere of Activision during game review meetings.
4. He expresses concern over the decline of these companies as leading publishers, noting the loss of their nurturing culture for developers.
5. Schofield’s insights come amidst industry-wide challenges, including layoffs and the growing influence of AI in gaming, raising questions about the future of major publishers.
Glen Schofield has been making headlines lately with his thoughts that are stirring up discussions in the gaming world. As the brain behind Sledgehammer Games and Striking Distance Studios, Schofield opened up a whole new topic when he shared his feelings about the “bittersweet” changes happening at major video game publishers, Electronic Arts and Activision.
Reflecting on His Journey
Schofield led the creation of Dead Space at EA back in 2008 and was involved in its spiritual successor, The Callisto Protocol, before leaving Striking Distance earlier in 2023. In a post on LinkedIn, he reflected on his ten years at both firms during their peak times.
With news breaking about EA’s shift towards private ownership through a $55 billion deal involving Saudi Arabia’s PIF, Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners—similar to Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard—Schofield decided to share his thoughts on LinkedIn.
Changes in the Industry
He compared the two companies, saying, “In the span of just a few years, the two publishing giants who shaped the last 20+ years of our industry have both entered new eras.”
Schofield shared his feelings about his experiences at both studios, explaining that:
I spent about a decade at each place, right in their primes. Seeing them lose their status as leading publishers and great training grounds hits harder than I thought.
It’s understandable why Schofield sees EA and Activision as key places for talent. He further explained:
EA was strict, organized, and structured in a way that made you rise to the occasion. Franchise reviews were tough, with no shortcuts or guessing.
You needed to understand every detail of your game. They would push and challenge you, but once you left that meeting, you understood exactly where you stood.
Different Environments
He found Activision to be a different experience, describing it as:
Where review meetings were loud, full of passion, and somewhat chaotic, with people asking questions over each other. Yet, these questions were sharp, focused, and always aimed at improving the game.
A one-hour meeting often stretched to two and a half, but it felt worthwhile somehow.
Schofield wandered down memory lane, noting that both companies shaped and nurtured a new wave of developers, but that era seems fleeting considering the recent acquisitions.
He wrapped up his thoughts with:
It’s hard to see these companies step back from what they used to be: major publishers, major developers, and amazing places to grow, learn, and refine your skills. They trained generations of us. Mine included.
His remarks come at a time when the entire industry is facing challenges with numerous layoffs as AI becomes more integrated into games, and publishers and developers are striving for profitability amidst rising costs and stiff competition. His insights give a glimpse into how developers perceive two of the most significant game publishers in the industry, even while facing ongoing uncertainty.
Source:
Link




