Tag: Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

  • Intel Core 5 Ultra 250K Plus Beats AMD Ryzen 5 9600X in Benchmarks

    Intel Core 5 Ultra 250K Plus Beats AMD Ryzen 5 9600X in Benchmarks

    Key Takeaways

    1. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus features an 18-core configuration with 12 E-cores and 6 P-cores, replacing the 14-core Core Ultra 5 245K.
    2. Passmark results show a 2.1% increase in single-thread performance and a 16.3% increase in multicore performance for the 250K Plus.
    3. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is over 66% faster than the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X in multithreaded tasks, and 4% faster in single-core performance.
    4. The Arrow Lake Refresh series also includes the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, which has additional E-cores and improved turbo clocks; the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus has been canceled.
    5. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K was already outperforming the Ryzen 5 9600X, but the latter may still be better for gaming performance.

    We have discussed various leaks regarding “Arrow Lake Refresh” before, and now we got some new info about the Core Ultra 250K Plus appearing on Passmark, showing some really impressive performance gains.

    Specifications Overview

    The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is set to take the place of the 14-core Core Ultra 5 245K. This new chip is anticipated to feature an 18-core configuration, consisting of 12 E-cores and 6 P-cores. An earlier Geekbench listing suggested that the performance for single-core was almost the same, but the multicore performance was significantly lower. This was likely due to it being an early sample that couldn’t perform at its best yet.

    Performance Insights

    However, the results from Passmark tell a different tale. The single-thread score shows an increase of merely about 2.1%, while the multicore score has surged by an impressive 16.3%. It’s clear that the extra four E-cores are making a difference, complemented by a boost of 100 MHz in the P-core and E-core clocks.

    When you compare this to the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, which is currently priced at $190 on Amazon, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is now over 66% faster in multithreaded tasks. In single-core performance, the 250K Plus takes the lead by a more modest 4%. This result isn’t surprising, given that the 245K was already outperforming the 9600X in benchmarks. Yet, it’s worth noting that the 9600X has been recognized as the better choice for gaming performance, and it may maintain that edge even after the arrival of the 250K Plus.

    Additional Models in the Lineup

    In addition to the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, the Arrow Lake Refresh series will also include the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, which will have four more E-cores and enhanced turbo clocks. However, the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus has been scrapped due to product overlap that Intel found unacceptable.

    This information was uncovered by TechPowerUp on Passmark.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,
  • Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Gaming CPU Scores Low on Geekbench 6

    Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Gaming CPU Scores Low on Geekbench 6

    Key Takeaways

    1. Intel is launching the Core Ultra 200K Plus gaming CPUs, including the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, but not the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus.

    2. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus features 18 cores (12 efficiency and 6 performance), with 4 additional E-cores compared to the previous 245K model.

    3. Performance improvements include a 100 MHz boost for P-cores and E-cores, while the E-core base clock decreases by 100 MHz; it may support DDR5-7200.

    4. In Geekbench 6 tests, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scored 3,113 points in single-core performance, a slight improvement over the 245K, but only 15,251 points in multi-core performance, lower than expected.

    5. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has specifications of 6 MB L2 cache, 30 MB L3 cache, a base clock of 4.2 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.3 GHz, using the LGA 1851 socket.

    Intel is set to launch its Core Ultra 200K Plus gaming CPUs very soon. The lineup has been confirmed to include the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. As mentioned previously, the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus will not be released.

    New Benchmarking Insights

    Previously, we had only seen leaked performance tests for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus. Recently, it seems the more budget-friendly 250K Plus has made an appearance on Geekbench 6. According to the listing, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus features a configuration of 18 cores, which includes 12 efficiency cores and 6 performance cores. This new chip adds 4 E-cores compared to its older sibling, the 245K.

    Performance Expectations

    There are likely to be improved clock speeds as well; the P-cores and E-cores will see an increase of 100 MHz (boost), while the E-core base clock will decrease by 100 MHz. It’s also been suggested that the CPU might support DDR5-7200. This testing was conducted on an Asus Prime Z890-P motherboard, with the CPU coupled with 32 GB of DDR5 RAM (Crucial Pro kit currently priced at $366.26 on Amazon).

    In single-core performance, the Intel Core Ultra 250K Plus achieved a notable score of 3,113 points. To put this in perspective, the previous 245K usually scores around 3,000 points in the same benchmark, which shows a slight improvement. However, in multi-core performance, the situation isn’t as promising—the 250K only managed to reach approximately 15,251 points, significantly lower than the expected 18,000 points from its predecessor.

    Changes Still Possible

    Being an initial benchmark, these scores can definitely change over time. Given that the 250K Plus has more physical cores and higher boost clocks for the P-cores, it’s puzzling why it is falling behind its predecessor.

    Additional specifications for the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus indicated by the benchmark include 6 MB of L2 cache, 30 MB of L3 cache, a base clock of 4.2 GHz, and a maximum boost clock of 5.3 GHz. Expectedly, the CPU will still use the LGA 1851 socket.

    Source:
    Link

     

    Tags: , ,