Tag: budget GPU

  • RTX 5050 Specs Leak: Bigger Bus & Higher TDP vs RTX 4050

    RTX 5050 Specs Leak: Bigger Bus & Higher TDP vs RTX 4050

    Key Takeaways

    1. The RTX 3050 was the last x50 class GPU for desktops, with Nvidia now limiting the RTX 4050 to laptops.
    2. The upcoming RTX 5050 will be a budget-friendly GPU priced under $300, confirmed through an ECC filing.
    3. The RTX 5050 features a GB207-300 GPU with 2,560 CUDA cores, 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, and a 128-bit bus.
    4. It has a TDP of 130 W, identical to the RTX 3050 and slightly higher than the RTX 4060.
    5. Performance of the RTX 5050 is expected to be better than the mobile RTX 4050, potentially approaching RTX 4060 levels, but without an increase in CUDA cores, significant gains may be limited.

    The RTX 3050 was the last GPU in the x50 class to be released for desktops, as Nvidia decided to limit the RTX 4050 to laptops only. This decision was quite strange, especially since there wasn’t a desktop RTX 40 model priced under $300, with the RTX 4060 launching at $299. Consequently, those looking for budget-friendly options had no choice but to look for older models like the RTX 30 or RX 6000 series.

    Introduction of the RTX 5050

    In a change of pace, Nvidia is set to offer gamers a budget-friendly option with the RTX 5050, which will be priced under $300. The confirmation of this GPU’s existence came from an ECC filing. Additionally, some specifications and pricing details have also been revealed. Thanks to leaker kopite7kimi on X, we now have some important information regarding the RTX 5050’s specs.

    Specifications Overview

    From the very beginning, it’s evident that the RTX 5050 is aimed at budget-conscious gamers, so there’s not much in the way of pleasant surprises. The card is expected to feature a GB207-300 GPU that includes 2,560 CUDA cores. This setup is matched with a 128-bit bus and 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Unfortunately, the leaker did not provide any details about clock speeds.

    The RTX 5050 is said to have a TDP of 130 W, which is the same as the desktop RTX 3050 and 15 W higher than the RTX 4060 (which is available on Amazon). Interestingly, this TDP is actually 5 W lower than the figure recently reported by Wccftech.

    Performance Expectations

    Since there is no desktop RTX 4050 for comparison, we’ll have to look at the mobile version of the RTX 4050 to make some educated guesses about performance.

    Initially, both GPUs share the same CUDA core count, but the RTX 5050 has a wider memory bus (128-bit compared to 96-bit). Furthermore, the RTX 5050 is likely to have a maximum TDP that is 15 W higher. While the number of CUDA cores may be identical, Nvidia can leverage this extra power to enhance the clock speeds of the RTX 5050 significantly compared to the RTX 4050’s boost clock, which can reach 2,370 MHz.

    In light of this information, we can anticipate that the RTX 5050 will offer a noticeable, though not extraordinary, performance improvement over the RTX 4050 mobile GPU. In the best-case scenario, it may even get close to the RTX 4060, which is about 25% faster than the RTX 4050 laptop in our tests. Nonetheless, without an increase in CUDA cores, such an outcome seems improbable.

    Source:
    Link

    Tags: , ,
  • Arc B580 vs. RTX 4060: Power Consumption and Performance Review

    Arc B580 vs. RTX 4060: Power Consumption and Performance Review

    After a long wait, reviews for the Intel Arc B580 have finally arrived, and it looks like the new Battlemage desktop graphics card is a solid choice for those on a budget. On average, this GPU outperforms both the RTX 4060 and RX 7600 by a nice margin. Moreover, Intel has improved its ray tracing capabilities, with the Arc B580 reportedly being faster than the RTX 4060 at 1080p; the performance gap widens to an impressive 28% at 1440p, as noted by TechPowerUp.

    Power Consumption Insights

    Now, let’s discuss the power usage of the Arc B580. Has Intel achieved significant improvements here as well?

    The answer is yes! Intel has made some advancements compared to the previous generation Arc Alchemist cards, with the Arc B580 consuming less power than the Arc A580. However, it still can’t quite compete with the RTX 4060 in terms of efficiency.

    Digital Foundry reports that in A Plague Tale Requiem, the Arc B580 performs better than the RTX 4060 but uses notably more power. The RTX 4060 is the most efficient card in this scenario, drawing between 120 to 130 W. In contrast, the Arc B580 pulls the most power in this test, ranging from 160 to over 170 W.

    Performance vs. Power

    The Arc B580 also beats the RTX 4060 in Cyberpunk 2077 (non-ray tracing), but this comes at a higher power cost. While the RTX 4060 uses only 120-130 W, the Arc B580 varies from 150 to 170 W. In Alan Wake 2, the Arc B580 again consumes more power compared to the RTX 4060 without delivering any extra performance.

    Linus Tech Tips also examined the Arc B580 and reached similar conclusions. The card has a Total Board Power (TBP) of 190 W, while the RTX 4060 sits at 116 W. It’s no shock that during F1 23, the Arc B580 appears to use about 186 W compared to the RTX 4060’s 129 W, marking a difference of a significant 44%.

    Final Thoughts

    Intel has definitely improved the power consumption with the Arc B580 compared to the Arc A580. LTT shows that the Arc A580 uses 206 W, which is 11% more than the Arc B580.

    In short, the Arc B580 Battlemage GPU is a commendable release from Intel with solid performance and impressive ray tracing features. Nevertheless, Intel still needs to work on matching the power efficiency of Nvidia’s products. Therefore, if power consumption isn’t a concern for you and you’re after a budget-friendly GPU with more than 8 GB of RAM, the Arc B580 is definitely worth considering.

    Source: Link

    Image 1
    Tags: , ,