Tag: Schenker Neo 16

  • GeForce RTX 5080 Laptops Outperform RTX 4080 by 25-35%

    GeForce RTX 5080 Laptops Outperform RTX 4080 by 25-35%

    Key Takeaways

    1. Performance Boost: Upgrading from a gaming laptop with GeForce RTX 4080 to one with RTX 5080 can yield a performance increase of approximately 30 to 35 percent based on 3DMark benchmarks.

    2. Real Game Improvements: The performance difference is also reflected in actual games, with titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Strange Brigade showing speed increases of 30 to 35 percent, and other games experiencing enhancements between 15 to 30 percent.

    3. DLSS Impact: Comparisons are made without DLSS features. With DLSS4, the RTX 5080 is expected to perform even better due to its advanced AI model and exclusive features like multi-frame generation.

    4. Enhanced Gaming Experience: If modern games support DLSS4, enabling it could significantly boost performance and widen the gap compared to older RTX 4080 laptops.

    5. Recommended Model: The 2025 Schenker XMG Neo 16 is highlighted as a strong option for gamers looking to upgrade for a better gaming experience.

    If you’re still using a gaming laptop with the GeForce RTX 4080, you might be curious about how much better a laptop with the RTX 5080 would be. From our experience with the new 2025 Schenker Neo 16, the performance boost is estimated to be around 30 to 35 percent, based on 3DMark benchmarks, as illustrated in the graph below. This data reflects the average results from nearly two dozen tested models, all equipped with GeForce RTX 4080 graphics.

    Gaming Performance Insights

    The approximate 30 percent performance difference is also evident in real games. For example, titles such as Cyberpunk 2077 and Strange Brigade show a speed increase of 30 to 35 percent. Meanwhile, games like Assassin’s Creed Shadows, Final Fantasy 15, Alan Wake 2, and Baldur’s Gate 3 experience enhancements ranging from 15 to 30 percent, whether you’re playing at 1080p or 4K resolutions.

    DLSS and Its Impact

    It’s important to mention that all these comparisons are based purely on rasterization without any DLSS features turned on. When considering DLSS benchmarks, the GeForce RTX 5080 would likely perform better than the RTX 4080. This is because DLSS4 uses a more sophisticated AI model compared to DLSS3, along with MFG (multi-frame generation), which is a feature exclusive to the GeForce RTX 50 series. If the games you enjoy support DLSS4, enabling this feature could significantly enhance your gaming experience, further increasing the performance gap compared to older gaming laptops.

    Conclusion

    In summary, the upgrade from an RTX 4080 laptop to one with an RTX 5080 can provide a considerable performance increase, especially if you’re playing modern titles that take advantage of new technologies like DLSS4. The 2025 Schenker XMG Neo 16 is a strong contender for those looking to step up their gaming experience.

    Source:
    Link

    Tags: , ,
  • GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop Benchmarks: 10% Slower Than RTX 5090

    GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop Benchmarks: 10% Slower Than RTX 5090

    Key Takeaways

    1. Performance Gap: The mobile RTX 5080 is 10 to 15 percent slower than the mobile RTX 5090 based on benchmark tests.

    2. Game Performance: The performance difference is more noticeable in demanding games and at 4K resolutions, while it decreases at lower resolutions.

    3. DLSS Effect: The performance advantage of the RTX 5090 over the RTX 5080 remains consistent, regardless of whether DLSS is enabled or disabled.

    4. Value Consideration: The small performance difference suggests that choosing the RTX 5080 could be more cost-effective than opting for the RTX 5090.

    5. Potential Savings: Selecting laptops with the RTX 5080 may result in savings of hundreds of dollars while still providing strong performance.

    Laptops with Blackwell GPUs are starting to appear on the market just as manufacturers have promised. Now that the high-end mobile RTX 5090 has been extensively tested, it’s time to look at how the mobile RTX 5080 stacks up. It’s not surprising that the performance difference between the mobile RTX 5080 and the mobile RTX 5090 is similar to the difference seen between the mobile RTX 4080 and the mobile RTX 4090.

    Performance Comparison

    3DMark benchmarks from our two Schenker Neo 16 test units, which both feature the same Ryzen 9 9955HX processors, indicate that the RTX 5080 model is about 10 to 15 percent slower than its more expensive counterpart. This gap is evident when playing actual games like Baldur’s Gate 3, Final Fantasy XV, Alan Wake 2, or Assassin’s Creed Shadows. As usual, the performance difference is larger at 4K resolutions in demanding games, while at lower resolutions, where graphics are less reliant on the GPU, the difference shrinks.

    DLSS Impact

    An interesting point to note is that the performance difference between the mobile RTX 5080 and mobile RTX 5090 stays constant regardless of whether DLSS is turned on or off. For instance, when playing Assassin’s Creed Shadows with DLSS activated, the mobile RTX 5090 still holds a 15 percent advantage over the mobile RTX 5080.

    Conclusion on GPU Selection

    The relatively minor performance gap between these two high-end GPUs suggests that it could be more beneficial to choose laptops with the RTX 5080 rather than the RTX 5090. This choice could lead to savings of hundreds of dollars or potentially offer better value for performance per dollar spent.

    Tags: , ,
  • GeForce RTX 5090 vs Razer Blade 16: Minor Performance Gains

    GeForce RTX 5090 vs Razer Blade 16: Minor Performance Gains

    Key Takeaways

    1. The mobile GeForce RTX 5090 shows about 15% better performance at a peak TGP of 175 W compared to the 160 W version in the Razer Blade 16.
    2. Performance gaps in gaming are larger at lower resolutions (30-50% faster at 1080p) but narrow at higher resolutions (10-5% faster at 4K).
    3. The Schenker Neo 16 A25 outperforms the Razer Blade 16 in lower resolutions, suggesting potential CPU limitations in the Razer system.
    4. Most users prefer higher resolutions, which may lead to disappointment with the small performance gains of the 175 W RTX 5090.
    5. The mobile RTX 5090 is only half as capable as its desktop version, with limited performance enhancements for the mobile RTX 50 series.

    As we keep testing the mobile GeForce RTX 5090, we’re starting to get a clearer idea of what this GPU can do at various TGP levels. The Schenker Neo 16 A25, which runs the GPU at a peak TGP of 175 W, shows about 15 percent better performance compared to the 160 W version in the Razer Blade 16, according to our 3DMark results below.

    Performance in Gaming

    However, when we look at actual gameplay, the performance gap seems larger at lower resolutions but narrows at higher resolutions without any upscaling techniques. For instance, our Schenker runs Monster Hunter Wilds and Cyberpunk 2077 at max 4K settings only about 10 percent and 5 percent faster, respectively, compared to the Razer system. On the flip side, at 1080p, those same games can run 30 to 50 percent faster on the Schenker, suggesting possible CPU limitations with the Razer. Most RTX 5090 users will likely prefer higher resolutions rather than lower ones, so the small performance gains with the 175 W RTX 5090 might leave some feeling a bit let down.

    Comparison with Desktop GPUs

    We’ve previously indicated that the mobile RTX 5090 in the Blade 16 is only half as capable as its desktop counterpart. Sadly, even the top-tier 175 W mobile GPU doesn’t significantly enhance the performance for the mobile RTX 50 series.

    Tags: , ,