Key Takeaways
1. The Arc 140V outperforms the Radeon 890M in performance per watt.
2. Higher-end Intel Core Ultra H-series CPUs use the integrated Arc 140T instead of the 140V.
3. Benchmark results show the Arc 140T has slight advantages in 3DMark but struggles in actual gameplay.
4. The Arc 140T exhibits lower power consumption, needing 45% less power than the Radeon 890M in Cyberpunk 2077.
5. Intel’s Arc GPUs excel in performance per watt despite not always matching AMD’s raw frame rates.
The Arc 140V stands strong against the Radeon 890M, particularly in terms of performance per watt. However, when you consider the higher-end Intel Core Ultra H-series CPUs, like the Core Ultra 9 285H, they tend to come with the integrated Arc 140T instead of the 140V. So, the question arises: is the 140T any quicker or more competitive compared to the Radeon 890M?
Benchmark Results
Regrettably, our initial benchmark findings from the MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo and Asus ZenBook Duo OLED, both featuring the Arc 140T, are quite varied as displayed below. The Arc 140T does show slight benefits in 3DMark benchmarks, but it frequently lags behind the AMD GPU in actual gameplay, such as in Baldur’s Gate 3 and Final Fantasy XV. The results for Cyberpunk 2077 and DOTA 2 Reborn (after driver updates) are nearly equal, while Intel suffers a significant loss in GTA V. On a positive note, the Intel GPU performs surprisingly well in the less popular game, Strange Brigade 3.
Power Consumption Differences
One of the most significant distinctions between these GPUs remains their power usage. A laptop with a Radeon 890M would require nearly 45 percent more power than one with an Arc 140T when playing Cyberpunk 2077, even though the performance gap is less than 10 percent. While Intel may not surpass AMD in terms of raw frame rates across all games, the chipmaker can at least boast about winning the performance-per-watt title for both the Arc 140V and 140T in this generation.