Tag: Lithium Iron Phosphate

  • Sodium-Ion vs LFP: Key Differences in Battery Discharge Tests

    Sodium-Ion vs LFP: Key Differences in Battery Discharge Tests

    Key Takeaways

    1. Sodium-ion batteries show promising performance, comparable to lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries in various tests.
    2. In high discharge load tests, sodium-ion batteries deliver around 93% of their rated capacity, outperforming lead-acid batteries significantly.
    3. Sodium-ion batteries excel in cold weather, producing higher capacity compared to lead-acid and LFP batteries at low temperatures.
    4. Sodium is more abundant and cheaper than lithium, making sodium-ion batteries a potential future alternative for energy storage.
    5. Despite current advantages, LFP batteries are still cheaper due to economies of scale, but sodium-ion technology is gaining attention for home storage solutions.

    Much has been talked about sodium-ion batteries and how they could become a popular substitute for lithium-based battery technologies. Sodium is much easier to find compared to its alternatives and it also works quite well, as shown by a real-world charge and discharge test that highlights its performance against other common battery types.

    Testing Methodology

    In a YouTube video by Alex Hibbert Originals, a sodium-ion battery is put to the test alongside a lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery and a lead-acid battery under various conditions. The outcomes are quite encouraging. In the initial test, the lead-acid battery only provides about 3Ah of its 4Ah rated capacity when it is discharged steadily at 15W. Meanwhile, the 2Ah LFP battery does remarkably well, with 1.94Ah being utilized; the 4Ah sodium-ion battery doesn’t quite match the LFP battery but still delivers 3.7Ah.

    High Discharge Load Performance

    When the discharge load is increased to 45W, similar results are observed. At an effective 1C discharge rate, the lead-acid battery only manages 2.7Ah, or roughly 68% of its rated 4Ah capacity. On the other hand, the LFP battery supplies a complete 2Ah, even at a 2C discharge rate, while the sodium-ion battery again delivers 3.7Ah, which is about 93% of its rated capacity.

    At a 120W discharge load, the lead-acid battery does even worse, providing just 2.4Ah—61% of its capacity—under an effective 2C discharge rate. The 2Ah LFP battery shines again, yielding an impressive 2.3Ah, likely due to the tough 4C discharge rate. The sodium-ion battery keeps up its performance, drawing 3.694Ah despite the increased discharge rate.

    Cold Weather Testing

    In an additional test, all three batteries were discharged in extremely cold conditions (-22°C) with a 45W power draw. The lead-acid battery produced 1.755Ah, the 2Ah LFP battery provided 1.89Ah, and the 4Ah sodium-ion battery yielded 3.42Ah.

    To sum it up, sodium-ion batteries seem to perform comparably to their LFP equivalents. Throughout all three standard temperature tests, the LFP battery essentially delivers 100% of its rated capacity, even when discharged at rates above 4C. The sodium-ion battery falls slightly short at around 93% of capacity. Meanwhile, the lead-acid battery, which is generally considered less effective, only manages to achieve about 75% of capacity, even at a lenient 0.3C discharge rate.

    Given that sodium-ion batteries are made from much cheaper materials compared to LFP batteries, they could represent the future of energy storage, especially in applications like home storage where the lower energy density isn’t a major concern. It’s worth mentioning, though, that LFP batteries are still cheaper at the moment due to economies of scale.

    Source:
    Link

    Sodium-Ion vs LFP: Key Differences in Battery Discharge Tests
    Tags: , ,
  • Chinese Researchers Develop New Method to Extend Lithium-Ion Battery Life Sixfold

    Chinese Researchers Develop New Method to Extend Lithium-Ion Battery Life Sixfold

    Key Takeaways

    1. New method can extend lithium-ion battery lifespan by over six times.
    2. Discovery of trifluoromethyl sulfonate lithium as an effective lithium carrier.
    3. Treated batteries can maintain performance for 12,000 charging cycles with minimal decline.
    4. Implementation requires battery design for electrolyte replenishment and gas venting.
    5. Environmental benefits include reduced electronic waste and lower reliance on lithium extraction.

    A new method for repairing batteries developed by researchers from China has the potential to extend the lifespan of lithium-ion batteries by more than six times. This innovation could significantly change how durable electric vehicles and mobile devices are. The research, published in the journal Nature, focuses on injecting a special solution that revives aged batteries to levels close to their original performance.

    Discovery of a New Lithium Carrier

    Over a span of four years, experts in macromolecular science at Fudan University—Gao Yue and Peng Huisheng—identified a new lithium carrier named trifluoromethyl sulfonate lithium. This molecule is effective in replenishing lost lithium ions in older batteries and works well with various battery types and electrolytes.

    Impressive Laboratory Results

    The lab tests yielded remarkable results: a commercial lithium iron phosphate battery, after being treated, could keep its original performance for 12,000 charging cycles. This is a stark increase from the typical lifespan of 2,000 cycles. Even more striking, the treated battery exhibited only a four percent decline in performance after 11,818 cycles. In comparison, a regular electric vehicle battery usually experiences a 30 percent capacity reduction within roughly 2.7 years of similar charging patterns.

    Requirements for Implementation

    For this technology to be effective, batteries must be designed with components that allow for the replenishment of electrolytes and the safe venting of gases. In the rejuvenation process, the compound breaks down to release lithium ions, which subsequently reconnect with the electrode material, while also producing gaseous byproducts that need to be properly vented.

    Environmental Benefits

    This advancement could significantly benefit the environment, as it not only prolongs battery life but also reduces electronic waste and reliance on lithium extraction. Fudan University states that the solution is cost-effective and ready for scaling. The research team is currently collaborating with leading global battery manufacturers to accelerate the process of commercialization.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, this innovation marks a major transition from conventional battery designs, leading to more sustainable battery technologies in the industry. However, additional testing and regulatory approvals are essential before this groundbreaking solution can be widely adopted.

    Source:
    Link

    Tags: , ,